Some of the many articles about it:

The notion that wolves fight amongst each other and the strongest becomes the “alpha” and the weakest is the “omega” and all that, is a misconception that has been debunked ages ago, and even the author of the study who called them “alphas” in the first place is pleading with his old publisher to stop printing the dang book already so this misconception can finally die out.

Wolf packs are more or less just families. One “breeding pair” and their pups, which often stay with their parents way into adulthood.

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    188
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering the original study only documented Wolves in captivity I explain it like this: Alpha, Beta, Sigma, whatever, is just the type of prison bitch you’d be, so congrats.

    • Wolf Link 🐺@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      102
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly this. Put any one species into a tiny depressing enclosure with way too many strangers and way too little food, and they will fight and establish a pecking order eventually. This has nothing to do with how the same species would behave in the wild and with enough resources to live comfortably, and the author realized that mistake years ago and is since trying to correct it.

      But I guess the entire “alpha male” thing is just too popular with certain people … ahem.

      • Synnr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I chuckle inside and exit the room at the first chance when someone non-jokingly refers to themselves as an alpha male. And that’s not because I’m afraid of them–the fact is that I’m the alpha male.

        /s

        Humans in packed cities could be described in a similar way though, if there’s not a social reinforcement in place, by the community elders who are respected and followed, to keep them from it. I live in a medium sized city now because of work, but even still I can relate to the rats [I’m aware of the studies flaws].

        Put any one species into a [packed] depressing [space] with way too many strangers and way too [varied amounts of resources per individual], and they will fight and establish a pecking order eventually. This has nothing to do with how the same species would behave in the wild and with enough resources to live comfortably.

        I grew up in the country with tens of acres and my nearest neighbor was a mile away. Separated from the small town nearby by a river and surrounded by thick hedgerows going miles around in every direction, with a huge open space (fields) between our house and the hedgerows. I’ve never been happy in the city. No matter where I am, I feel like I’m in a cage. I’m not agoraphobic but there’s a sense of being ‘watched’ when I leave my house that just isn’t there when you live in a remote area. All the people, sights, sounds, smells can be incredibly overwhelming at times.

        I am only capable of attaining a true level of peace when I’m in nature.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Humans are territorial animals and the sooner we accept that, the better off we’ll be.

          • Synnr
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            At first I read that as terrible, but on second and correct read I fully agree.

            I’m curious if anyone who reads this comment can answer yes about the apartment living to the following question:

            If you’ve lived in a decent remote area with all the basics covered, and also an apartment complex inside of a city, did you prefer the city or the necessities-covered remote area more?

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          yeah no this is a bad take, humans are arguably the single most social species on earth and cities are where almost everyone lives for a damn good reason.

          It’s not healthy for most people to live isolated in the countryside, we need a community to maintain mental health.

          • Synnr
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re looking at it very black and white, as if you can’t live in a peaceful more remote area but still visit with friends and have them over, socialize at work, etc. After all, if you live in a city you don’t live with or talk to all the people you see, they’re just there, noise in the background.

      • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also a great argument for the fact that caging humans doesn’t change anything in a positive direction. Especially when you enslave them too like in countries with barbaric penal systems such as the US.

      • mycatiskai@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funny that pecking order is something you see in chickens. So these human alpha males are copying hen behavior.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ironically its that they don’t have “alphas” in the wild because they just separate and leave each other alone…

    For humans in school, prisons, and even just work environments we’re a lot more like captive wolves than wild

    This terminology arose from research done on captive wolf packs in the mid-20th century—but captive packs are nothing like wild ones, Mech says. When keeping wolves in captivity, humans typically throw together adult animals with no shared kinship. In these cases, a dominance hierarchy arises, Mech adds, but it’s the animal equivalent of what might happen in a human prison, not the way wolves behave when they are left to their own devices.

    That being said, any person describing themselves as an alpha is usually a big piece of shit.

    • Wolf Link 🐺@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally, I like the “alpha as in new software” approach: Alpha version = unstable, missing important features, filled with flaws, prone to breakdown and not fit for the public.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually met and interviewed Mech some years ago while working on a story regarding wolves in Oregon. He was a kind and very approachable person.

      Fun fact; his name is pronounced “Meech,” not “mech” as in “mechanic.”

  • mean_bean279@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of guys have started calling themselves sigma males, but i just approach them and tell them I’m a Smegma male which is over a sigma male. 😤 these are facts that cannot be disputed.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just like the vaccines cause autism study, this won’t ever die out. People only ever remember the original.

  • Meldroc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    These days, the only people still using this debunked wolf talk are douchebros, chuds, & incels.

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Indeed. There are many still who are making big bucks on this misconception. The worst offender in my opinion is “The dog whisperer”, who is likely the worst well known dog trainer, and has done (and still does) a lot of damage. The whole basis for his school of thought is based on this alpha/beta/omega hierarchy.

      • twelvefloatinghands@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Honestly, that feels like giving them too much credit. Chimps are fucking terrifying. The more I learn about them, the more I wonder “jesus fucking christ, how badass/insane was Jane Goodall?!”. Those things are the closest things to real demons I’ve ever heard about.

        Edit: well, aside from particularly unhinged humans

    • orichalcum00@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but bonobos are close to chimpanzees and humans too yet they have totally different culture than chimpanzees.

      In fact, bonobos used to be a subspecies of chimpanzees but because that nonviolent culture, they’ve become their own species.

      • twelvefloatinghands@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes, but have you considered the gargantuan confirmation bias of anyone willing to map debunked wolf social dynamics onto humans?

        • orichalcum00@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes but you implied that even if there’s no alpha male in wolves, there’s alpha male in chimps and while we can’t apply wolf’s power dynamic to humans, we can with chimps because they’re a closer species to us. I wanted to point out that there’s another close relatives of us and chimps (the bonobos) who are not actually violent so we still can’t justify male violence on humans because we find it in chimps.

      • credit crazy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those kinds of animals have always kinda fascinated me with how it just makes you wonder if there’s a element of genomes when it comes to your personality

        • Wolf Link 🐺@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No idea about personality traits, but there have been studies about what kind of human behavior, especially facial expressions, might be “pre programmed” in our genes. For example, rolling your eyes when you’re frustrated with someone, or raising your eyebrows when you are surprised - that’s something even most blind people do instinctively, despite never having seen it / never learned it from others.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not really. In chimps, if you want to have the highest status as a male, you have to form coalitions of friendship with other relatively high-status males. Chimp males who try to simply beat the shit out of everyone else without forming coalitions, tend to get “dealt with” prison style where the rest of the troop’s males show up 4 or 5 deep and either beat the shit out of them, or fucking kill them.

      Chimps are metal as fuck in this regard.

      That said, while it’s true that we get a lot of insight into human behavior by studying non-human primate behavior, it’s not the case, nor does anyone who matters argue as such, that human behavior is or should be precisely analogous to what we see in our close relatives.

  • Classy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alpha hyenas, however, those are definitely real. But they’re boss babes so the PUAs can’t work with that

    • squib@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People who say alpha wolves don’t exist obviously never seen me crankin my hog. ARRRROOOOOOOO

  • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean if you believed that shit in the first place you’re probably not going to believe this post eh

    • nudermeisters@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Women: Get some minute fraction of some sort of competitive advantage against men, when the OnlyFans “revolution” happened

      Men: I’m suddenly a “high value” male (who is probably broke)

      • a man