• Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had to use the mobile version of Chrome recently on a locked down work device with an MDM policy that prevented installation of other browsers. It made me realize I had no idea just how far gone the mobile web has become with ads.

    As an experiment I grabbed a random article on my Google News feed for today and opened it in Chrome with no ad blocking allowed and Samsung Internet with ad blocking enabled to compare.

    Chrome produces a nightmarish hell scape of ads that just gets worse the further down you scroll.

    Samsung Internet isn’t perfect because there is still a large banner taking up space at the top of the screen, but it blocks all of the ads in the article along with the website’s own ads for other articles.

    The cynic in me, however, acknowledges that the truth of the situation looks more like this, even with ad blocking enabled.

    • King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Uhm yeah? The more ad blockers are used the more ads they have to show to the rest of the users to make up the lost revenue

      • PlantJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like a great reason not to use the home screen search bar. I use nova launcher so I can disable it completely.

        • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Reading this just made me decide to remove the Google search bar from my home screen and put the Firefox widget there instead, but I’m a little disappointed that it really just functions as another button to open Firefox instead of letting me use the bar like it visually appears it should be.

          • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The type of widget you’re thinking of hasn’t existed for a while. Google broke that functionality on Android a couple versions back. Some apps still make widgets that create the illusion it’s working that way, but it really isn’t.

            So no, you can’t have a functioning Firefox search bar on the home screen.

            But you can make a widget that’s basically a shortcut to the internal searchbar. One tap will:

            Open the browser, create a new tab, place the cursor in the search bar, and open the keyboard.

            It serves the same function: one tap then you can start typing your query and hit enter. It just doesn’t do that on the homescreen.

        • 5redie8@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, nova launcher is the broken record response but there really is a reason for it. Its the stock launcher on crack, use it out of the box or spend hours tuning it into your own thing, while being super easy to use either way.

      • ahriboy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Until Apple changes the rule to comply with new EU laws. Hope those laws will affect users globally, not just in the EU.

        • icedterminal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hope those laws will affect users globally, not just in the EU.

          Maybe. You know how Apple how is. Lol

          • affiliate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            i could really see it going either way. apple likes to pander to the developer crowd, and they also like to have a consistent and streamlined operating system. both of those things would be strong incentives to roll out the changes worldwide. (many in the “developer crowd” would probably want access to third party app stores and non webkit browsers, and many people who don’t follow technology closely might be very confused by things like the firefox app being fundamentally different in the EU vs US.)

            depending on how the laws are enforced, people could also theoretically switch their phone region to the EU in order to download those apps.

            although apple also loves to have control over their operating system, and they have a pretty large market share in the US. i doubt they’d love giving up that much control.

        • icedterminal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not really “going out of my way to dig at Apple”

          There’s little reason to use any other browser on iOS because of the policy they enforce. If all you’re getting is just Safari with a different face, you’re literally making your browsing experience slower and worse. Some people don’t know this so my comment educates them on such.

          • Swarfega@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Wait. So you can’t install Firefox and uBlock Origin on iPhone?

            I’ve been contemplating moving to an iPhone but this is actually quite a big turn off.

            • icedterminal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Firefox doesn’t support extensions on iOS. As it’s currently impossible. Due to Apple’s restrictions forcing the use of WebKit, this makes Firefox (Gecko) extensions incompatible. Additionally, Apple’s own extension system for WebKit is proprietary. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/add-ons-firefox-ios

              As far as features go, what can’t natively be done is handled with JavaScript injections. As WebKit allows you to do this. Since it’s locked down most take advantage of this. Naturally, injecting several functions can slow down the web experience. About the only feature IMO that will matter to most people is the ability to sync content. Such as passwords and browsing history.

    • philodendron@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idk why the other guys saying it’s some edge browser. This is the google app on iPhone. The bottom part pops up when you click on articles because they’re pushing their AI summaries. It’s actually a great feature but it’s annoying how much space it takes up

  • Illuminati@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly web browsing on mobile has been a piece of sh1t for a long time, without adblockers it’s a total cancer.

    And even with an adblocker it’s always the god damn cookie popups…

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Firefox has a plugin called I Don’t Care About Cookies, Which basically just ignores the pop-ups and auto except / rejects them, but for some strange reason that plugins you can add to the mobile version of Firefox are extremely limited.

      Essentially the plugin implements the functionality that should have been mandated under the cookie law to begin with which makes the choice browser side rather than web side

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox and uBlock Origin…. Now sadly I wish I could find something like that on iPhone.

  • akakevbot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yup. I work from home and have a pihole on my network at home so I’ve gotten used to not seeing the ads.

    Was browsing on mobile data while on the road and was reminded why its necessary. It was unbearable.

    • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do the same with an (almost) always-on vpn to the same pi with wireguard set up. I use Tasker on Android to auto start the wireguard tunnel if I disconnect from my home Wi-Fi. I typically only disable it if I’m running into issues with an app etc, and I’m too lazy to dig into and whitelist any relevant domain.

    • LazerFX@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m working on setting up a VPN, so even when mobile I’ll connect back through my home network to view filtered adverts. At least, I might end up using DNS from my home anyway.

      • TeamDman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only due to using a different user agent, it’s totally possible to build a for-the-people pagerank that would see what we see and deprioritize stuff like ads and fluff on recipe pages

    • jcit878@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      don’t you enjoy discussing with your friends and family what interesting ads you’ve seen lately? - what marketers think people actually do

  • Kuro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And yet they’re baffled as to why so many people use adblockers

    • dinckelman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just to clarify what’s happening here - The top 15% of the screenshot? That’s the website itself. The rest is an ad. That’s actually insane.

      I’ve been wishing for an ability to blacklist search results somehow, because of websites like this. For tech, stuff like CNET or Zdnet. For gaming, it’s gamesradar, or CBR, or especially gameranx. All just garbage information with 300 cookies to feed the ad networks

        • fiddlestix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Kagi is fabulous. You can also use nextdns to block ads from getting in. They have a generous free tier and the unlimited is cheap. I have it on my router = ad free house.