Do we really need West and South when we can use negative North and negative East?

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just guessing here, but I would think it’s for for clarity and brevity. West and South are shorter to say and distinct enough to avoid being easily misheard causing somebody to go in the opposite direction than intended.

    • dbx12@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      Spin it further and get rid of “great” and “outstanding”. I suggest using plus good and double plus good.

    • Infrapink@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s actually how it works in Irish. The word for good is deas, while the word for bad is deas prefixed with the negating particle , so mídheas.

      (There are still separate words for tge cardinal directions).

      • KSP Atlas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Is it? I tried checking in a dictionary but it didn’t list mídheas as a word and “deas” was defined as right/nice/honest, not just “good”

  • droning_in_my_ears@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why do we have 26 letters? Why not just communicate in binary!

    01010100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110110 01100101 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101110 01100001 01110100 01110101 01110010 01100001 01101100 00100001

    • sznowicki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 months ago

      Better idea! What if we use 0 for North and then divide the circle around by exactly 360 points? That way we don’t need NSEW, we have 0, 90, 180, 270!

      • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ah… I love airplanes… To be clear, the issue with this is that magnetic 0 is not the same as true 0. There’s a slight offset that can cause issues. So why not have like… True 0 and magnetic 0. T0 and m0?

        • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fun fact… there is an ICAO effort to “get rid” of magnetic headings for runway numbers. I listened to a presentation they did last year, and as much as I went into it thinking it wasn’t needed, I was a convert listening to them.

          Btw, magnetic variation is pretty significant in some places. It’s 13 degrees where I am.

              • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I suppose it makes sense but it feels wrong. I’m so used to having and using magnetic but that isn’t a reason to continue doing less efficient things.

                The redundancy aspect is there as when systems would fail (GPS for true), the magnetic redundancy would still come into okay and still work enough to get by.

        • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Why not?

          Because what happens when your referent changes? Which direction is Mars from Earth? We obviously need a single navigational system that works anywhere in the universe.

    • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      We could use one, and assume we’re operating in the field of complex numbers:

      1 N = North
      i N = West
      i2 N = South
      i3 N = East.

      And we could use the complex modulus to indicate distance or speed… or we could map the Riemann sphere onto the surface of the earth and use a single complex number to indicate location.

      • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        You probably already know this, but for others’ amusement… Southwest’s Pilot Training pathway program is called Destination 225, and I doub’t that many prople even in the airline business get the reference. So if nothing else, they’ve got a branding headstart.

        • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I didn’t! Had to look up online compass that had degrees on it.

          But it doesn’t surprise me that any company’s PR guys would come up with things like that.

          • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            An even funner Southwest PR story is the Malice in Dallas. I don’t have a good resource to point you to, but you can google it. it was an armwrestling match between CEOs to settle a corporate dispute. The two companies holstered their lawyers and settled the grudge with a big PR event.

  • zaphod
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    And I say we don’t have enough names, we should have names for at least 30° and 45° increments.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      We do, they’re just combinations of the 90 degree ones.

      Southwest. North-Northeast.

      • Theatomictruth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, there are 32 named points on a compass, one every 11.25 degrees, you can even fractionalize it to get even more granular

        Southwest by west half west for example is 242 degrees

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Most Mediterranean cultures used to have names for at least eight winds, each at 45 degrees from each other. Greeks (and therefore Romans) used twelve, at 30 degrees.

      Here’s a classic navigator’s wind rose, for instance, with 32 different directions based on eight named winds (might be a bit hard to read on dark backgrounds, here’s the original SVG):

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Better question is why don’t they have 8? I hate saying “north by north east”.

    • karashta@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Northeast would be one of the 8 already. North by northeast is the direction between north and northeast

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I understand that. If we had a word for north east, let’s say “yest”, then I wouldn’t have to say “north by north east”, I could just say “north yest”.