• ZDL@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ll believe that the USA will allow this business to end when I see it. For some bizarre reason the PTBs in the USAnal government is massively hard on this idiot technology.

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s not business ending because they have enough consistent income to stall the courts until the complainant runs out of money or until time itself ends, whichever comes first.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Potentially industry ending. If this court case goes against anthropic WSJ, Disney, etc are getting the green light to take the AI companies apart in their cases.

  • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you or I did this type of violation, the penalty would be criminal charges and jail time. Even the company founders were involved in piracy; i.e. not the actions of some low-level misguided employee.

  • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I wish I could be hopeful; But these days it’s just permitted to do crimes in the US. Especially if you are rich or a rich corporation.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    AI and copyright are in fundamental contradiction, I don’t see a future where both survive.

    But that doesn’t mean copyright wins. That might mean that copyright ends up dramatically weakened for the sake of the hype bubble.