• lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is the German plan:

    1. Shutdown the nuclear plants
    2. Burn more lignite
    3. WFH

    The council said assumptions made by the transport ministry on the effectiveness of the planned and already implemented measures, such as a discounted national rail ticket, a CO2 surcharge on truck tolls and increased working from home, were also optimistic. “Private vehicle individual transport is not addressed, so to speak. And that is ultimately a gap in the transport programme,” Brigitte Knopf, deputy chairwoman of the council, told a news conference presenting the report findings on Tuesday

    The plan for transportation emissions, 2/3 of the target to be cut, is WFH. Yikes!

    • cedeho@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If all the subsidiaries that went into nuclear power the last few decades went to renewables instead Germany would have no issues at all, but hey… giving tax payer money to some very few giant energy companies is more important than creating a Europe leading renewables energy sector that does not rely on russian fossils or nuclear material.

      You should know that nuclear power is very expensive while renewables are absurd crazy cheap. I’ve been to a German Endlager and it takes years and BILLIONS of Euros just to seal this thing off. Guess who is paying? Mostly tax payers.

      There’s be no company in Germany which would be willing to run a nuclear power plant if they were responsible for the permanent disposal of their waste on their own instead of letting the tax payer pay (most of) for it.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s all well and good in the energy sector. What about transportation? If I understand correctly, transportation makes up the majority of the emissions Germany aims to cut

        • Zacryon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sadly, we have a long history of incompetent transport ministers. That didn’t change with the last elections.

    • GenEcon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Funny, because the energy sector was the only on track to fulfill the targets. Last year it even overshot its targets and is expected to again save more CO2 as planned in 2023.

      Maybe, just maybe, its more relevant that other sectors are managed by the FDP (market liberals) and SPD (social democrats), while energy is managed by die Grünen (greens).

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you know about the transportation sector? It is where 2/3 of Germanys planned reduction is.

    • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only there was some means of replacing all that coal with a non-carbon intensive source of energy that isn’t dependant on the weather…

      Has anyone heard of such a technology?


      Sarcasm aside, that Germany shut down their last two nuclear reactors so recently and carried through is astounding. The excuses are mind-boggling. They’re old? Refurbishing is cheaper and faster than new built. They need re-certification? Then do it.

      • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s more efficient to use the money required for

        1. The inspection
        2. The renovations
        3. Acquiring new fuel

        And spend it on renewables than to do the above.

        Also a big factor noone seems to care about: staff. The people who worked there have other jobs now. You can’t just plop a reactor plant somewhere and expect it to make electricity you need highly specialised staff for that. We also did not invest into training new staff because why would we, with the stop for nuclear power being decided 10 years ago.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Highly Specialized staff

          I watched this animated documentary from the states called The Simpsons that seems to state otherwise.