DytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoWhite House Faith Officelemmy.worldimagemessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up11.26Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageWhite House Faith Officelemmy.worldDytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square164fedilink
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 month agoDoes anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
minus-squareivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37·1 month agoWhat’s laws, precious?
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·1 month agoYou know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
minus-squareroot_beer@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 month agoYep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-21 month agoYou need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
What’s laws, precious?
You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
lol