• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 minutes ago

    Those poor suckers. I don’t think I’ve seen an advertisement on YouTube in something like five years.

    Edit: And I sure as hell ain’t paying Google either.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    Google’s ad-pocalypse is a self-licking ice cream cone. Bragging about $10.4 billion squeezed from advertisers while users rage-install adblockers? Masterclass in delusion. The “diminishing returns” of shoving 15 unskippable ads into a 3-minute tutorial is peak platform decay.

    Creators churning out AI slop just to feed the algorithm? Pathetic. But why innovate when you can monetize desperation? The ad bubble’s bursting—soon we’ll all laugh at brands paying billions for bots and ad-blind zombies.

    Keep stacking those unblockable trackers, Sundar. We’ll just keep finding new ways to mute your digital serfdom.

  • pls@lemmy.plaureano.nohost.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 minutes ago

    I have no issue in paying creators with my YouTube Premium subscription. What annoys me is seeing creators feed the algorithm with “regular posts” or create filler videos for sponsors when they have nothing to say.

    That and seeing explainer videos from someone who learned something five minutes before recording… the number of copycats and regurgitating the same news content is depressing.

    The same goes for the epidemic of faceless AI videos narrating generic content… horrible. The “don’t recommend channel” must be worn off by now, from me alone. :-)

    Fantastic exceptions from talented creators make it worth it, so I am happy.

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Reminder that Firefox on mobile also has ublock origin and other add ons that improve the experience.

  • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Ads didn’t make 10 billion, Google charged advertisers 10 billion. IMO ads have gone so pervasive they’ve hit a point of diminishing returns. They’re everywhere, we hate them, and those 10 billion spent would have to bring many more billions in sales to be an attractive service.

    I can’t wait for the ad bubble to burst, as advertisers understand they’re just giving money away to megaadvertisers for paltry conversions.

    • _wizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m an admin in Google Ad Manager for a few hundred sites. Saying that to say I’ve read a lot of their documentation. They have a great graph showing this very concept. Less ads, less money, happy users. More ads, more money, unhappy users. They’re aware. They aren’t pouring the poison. They’re designing the pitcher and selling different size cups.

    • win95@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Influencer sponsorships, especially for beauty influencers, have already been declining. Companies realize that these influencers are just posting ads now and people don’t believe their “honest opinion” anymore. So it’s a mystery to me why companies still pay so much money for regular online ads.

    • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I have to see them at school all the time, because our teacher’s teachers don’t bother installing adblockers.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      When I watch YouTube on the Roku in my bedroom I see ads and it’s terrible. If I see a 30 second ad I go back and hit play again, usually I have to do that two or three times and then I get a 5-second skippable ad. Even then I’m often only two or three minutes into the video before it plays another ad.

    • rockter@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It really is a pro tip, when installing more than one ad blocker is just gonna make for a worse experience, never mind the fact that it’s going to make the ad blcokers themselves actually not work the way they’re supposed to.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    On desktop: uBlock origin (Vivaldi or Firefox). On mobile: Newpipe and AdAway (VPN mode, or rooted phone).

  • firadin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Still need a good strategy for blocking ads on my TV. Mostly watching YouTube through a Chromecast so I can control it from my phone

      • firadin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You need an android TV or an android box similar to a Roku to use that? Not super familiar. Any recommendations to be compatible with my current non-smart TV?

        • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Android streaming boxes are the most flexible. Replace the stock launcher with projectivy once set up.

          Inexpensive/basic: Onn

          Best for multi-speaker theaters and video upscaling: Nvidia Shield Pro

    • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Same but I don’t use YouTube I tend to use it for TV. Cast and forget cable TV for free.

      I hate edge but edge also let’s you stream from your PC to TV with no ads.