I’ve seen people using “that’s what she said” in a very serious setting, as a way to say “good point/touché”. They had no idea it was from the Office.

  • badbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Not a phrase, but as a kid, I thought old people got old timers, and couldn’t remember things. I later learned it was called Alzheimer’s.

  • Kacarott@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I learnt the German word “geil” from context to mean something like “awesome” or " really good".

    At some point I went to some mega fancy restaurant, like dressed up fancy and everything. The waiter asks how the entrees were, and I respond “geil”. My wife burst out laughing and later explains to me that while “geil” is used to mean “awesome”, it’s very much slang and actually means “horny”.

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Case and point.

    I thought it was like “I made my case, and my point”.

    But it’s case in point

  • tobogganablaze@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    “that’s what she said” isn’t from the Office though. It’s way older then that. It was already a catchpharse on Saturday Night Live in the 80s. Probably older then that still.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    “That’s what she said” long predates the office. I feel like it was used in SNL in the 80’s.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s what she said appears in print as early as Edmond Addeo and Robert Burger’s 1973 book EgoSpeak: Why No One Listens to You: “The cheapest shot of all, of course, is the ancient one-liner, ‘That’s what she said.’ This reply can be used after virtually any remark, however innocent, and the speaker can summon up some hint of double-entendre.”

  • hisao@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    As an ESL: “IKR” aka “I know, right?”. I thought it has kind of passive-aggressive/sarcastic undertext, meaning something more of a “bro cmon this is obvious/trivial”, while it’s actually seems to be quite the opposite - emphatic affirmation of someones excitement about something. Keep in mind, I’ve never heard it IRL as I rarely talk to native speakers IRL, it was just a wrong impression from chats and online discussions.

  • Skyline969@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    For the longest time I thought “limp wristed” meant ineffective, like if you were to hold something with a limp wrist you were more liable to drop it.

    That was a fun day at work when I found out what it actually meant… after using the term in the middle of a meeting to describe a vendor’s poor performance.

    • Sergio@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same with using the phrase “raw-dogging” (I think there was a cartoon about it.)

  • awesomesauce309@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Growing up I always wrote off “it’s always in the last place you look” as just another random thing adults loved to just say all the time.

    • gerbler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This used to piss me off as a child. Parents would say this when I’d ask them where stuff was and I’d retort “not if I never find it!”

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Protipp: Once you did find it, and are done with it, don’t put it back where it was. Put it where you first looked for it.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s meant to be humorous or ironic, or to express frustration.

      Of course it’s in the last place you look, because once you find it you stop looking.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        My interpretation of it wasn’t meaningless.

        Like my search for object algorithm goes like:

        1. First look where I expect it to be. It’s not really missing at this point.
        2. Then I think of whether I can remember putting it somewhere different and check there. If it doesn’t turn up at this point, I now consider it missing.
        3. At this point, I’ll make a mental list of all of the places it makes sense to be and search down that list.
        4. If it’s still not found, then I’ll start just looking everywhere until either I find it, get distracted by something else, or give up on finding it.

        I always thought of “it’s in the last place you look” in terms of the list in #3. You think of 5 places it might be, and whatever the order you check them in, it will be in the 5th location you check.

        Your interpretation sounds more like it’s in terms of #4. Or maybe #3 but checking each place as you think of it instead of building up a backlog.

    • Alice@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      So is that phrase a joke? I see people talk about how dumb/obvious it is, but I always thought it meant “it’s always in the last place you [would have thought to] look”, as in a ridiculous place you’d never consider.

      However my whole family is ADHD and used to setting things in dumb spots you’d never check.

  • Stepos Venzny@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I thought kid gloves were for dealing with kids but actually they’re made from the skin of kids.

    Also of note, I thought the kids were children.

    I’ve seen people using “that’s what she said” in a very serious setting, as a way to say “good point/touché”.

    As in there was a literal she who literally said that? Otherwise I can’t understand this.

    • There is, indirectly.

      “That’s what she said,” is a descendant of a line that began with “said the actress to the bishop”. And that is, according to folklore, a real event in which a named actress (I forget her name) asked a real bishop (again, don’t know the name anymore) about his “prick” to which the bishop responded that it was “throbbing”. (And according to that same folklore the butler, having overheard that upon entering the room, dropped his tray.)

      The backstory being that the bishop had been gardening and injured his thumb on a rose. She was asking about the injury.

      But that is supposedly the beginning of the expression “said the actress to the bishop” which is the phrase used in writing for “that’s what she said” as far back as the old Charteris “The Saint” novels at least.

  • kamills@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    In my language I though it was “bære den af” litrally translation, to carry it off. Turns out its “bære nag”, carry a bunch of straws. The saying means to hold a grudge. They do sound super close to each other when spoken

  • inlandempire@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    As a non native English speaker it took me some time to fully grasp the meaning of “i couldn’t care less” it’s quite tricky

      • Hamartiogonic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Fortunately, didn’t get to misuse them. Just took a while to figure out what they really meant. When something is “all but impossible” it shouldn’t be taken literally. Actually just invert the apparent meaning and you get the actual one.

  • Hominy_Hank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    ‘You only use 10% of your brain’ is only referring to the physical areas of your brain. Which is not true, because we have scans that can show that we use all areas of the brain.

    I always thought that saying was referring to how we only use 10% of our brains potential.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s how it’s been used a lot. By people who want to sell you something promising to increase your potential.

      But in reality, we only use 10% of our brain in the same way a traffic light only uses 1/3 of its lamps.