• uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Say what you can about communism, but you clearly see that capitalism is so much worse.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Communism lifted an illiterate nation of serfs into an industrial and atomic super power in, like, 50 years.

      Which is to say just as bad as capitalism but approximately four times faster.

      • TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Heard someone say that their grandparents who left the USSR during the collapse in the early 90’s told them something along the lines of “not everything the Soviet government promised us about communism was true, but everything they told us about capitalism is true.”

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There were 24,849 homicides in 2022.

    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm

    Almost none of them, if any, likely required a nationwide manhunt.

    Not one of them required an escort of 30 police officers plus a helicopter to the courtroom.

    As far as I can tell, none of them were charged with terrorism.

    And now he’s getting as biased a judge as he could possibly get.

    If we’re going to start charging murderers with terrorism, let’s start with the cops.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    9 hours ago

    you people clearly don’t know what you are talking about. “conflict of interest” only happens if it conflicts the interests of billionaires

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I knew they were going to try him in a kangaroo court, I just didn’t think they’d be this obvious about it.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The justice system probably assigned the judge randomly. It’s just finding a judge without wealth is impossible … which in and of itself is a problem.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Interesting, interesting, interesting, interesting.

    I need the bootlickers to show up and tell me it’s just coincidence.

    The whole damn thing is a show. They are terrified. The book they usually play by isn’t working. What will happen? The amount of support Luigi has is astounding. It’s even a topic I tested the waters with at work and these people I work with make a decent living.

    America is waking up. I feel it.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I genuinely think that they’ll have a hard time finding an impartial jury… I think that at this point, pretty much anyone who doesn’t live under a rock has heard of him and has an opinion on whether he should be found guilty.

      Regardless of which way you fall on that particular topic, you’re biased, and that would exclude you from serving on the jury.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I thought the same thing about the Trump trial, but they legitimately turned over rocks and found the most oblivious Americans living under them. There are evidently tons of people out there living in their own little bubble, completely untethered from the news media or even just casual conversations with strangers and probably have no idea who Luigi is right now. The news might not be able to reach them, but a jury summons from the state can, and the prosecution is going to hunt for these individuals specifically.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          11 hours ago

          An unfavorable view is still bias. The defense would reject any juror that shows significant malice towards the plaintiff.

      • P1nkman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’ve spoken with friends about this is Denmark, and we all read the news with great pleasure.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Correct. And I strongly suspect they are wildly pumping out news about him to narrow the juror pool to people who do live under rocks.

        The other option is that jurors lie about their bias, which opens them up for legal consequences.

        His defense, in any case, has a very difficult task - they need to be able to somehow communicate him being innocent against stacked charges OR paint him light that the rest of us see that leans them towards Jury Nullification.

        My hope is that potential jurors hide their bias, which isn’t easy, but gives him the best chance.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The other option is that jurors lie about their bias, which opens them up for legal consequences.

          That’s almost impossible to prove, and almost never prosecuted.

          • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            They’re trying to use fear to spin a story against this guy. They’re going to use fear when telling them about lying under oath.

            They’re going to use fear the whole way, it’s their only weapon.

            It’s why they are so afraid. A lot of us see through it, and see their real fear.

          • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            There are plenty of nevers and almost nevers with this case already, so it’s not unreasonable to worry that there might be more.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          If they can find an “unbiased” jury, then the defense does indeed have a difficult challenge ahead. Even if the prosecution fails with their terrorism charge, they can fall back on murder 2, which is much harder to defend against.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        23 hours ago

        That’s literally what it’s taken in the past. It took the fear of communism to really get unionization accepted in the US. In other eras it’s taken the threat of invasion by external powers.

  • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    382
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Country wide outage at the corruption involved with the health insurance

    Health insurance industry: we can make it worse

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It’s a pharmaceutical company. They’re no saints, but it’s disingenuous to compare them to people who take money and provide nothing but a rubber stamp.

          • futatorius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            people who take money and provide nothing but a rubber stamp

            They don’t even do that. Their incentive is to deny coverage. They’re not healthcare insurance companies, they’re healthcare rationing companies. And we pay them.

          • booly@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The providers (hospitals, clinics, labs, doctor practices), insurers/payers (whether for profit like United, nonprofit like most Blue Cross Blue Shields, or government like Medicare), and pharmaceutical/medical device companies fight each other the whole time to make the most money off of the patients/beneficiaries/taxpayers. Big Pharma runs up prices and persuades doctors to prescribe their treatments, while doctors themselves have a profit motive in running up unnecessary treatments, all while insurers try not to pay for stuff, necessary or not.

            It’s a broken system, but it’s also worth pointing out that the scammers in each camp hate the other camps just as much as the public does. There are hospital execs and pharma execs basically cheering on the anger at insurers, who will turn around and rip off the same victims in a different way.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yes and thats because the solution isnt to put different people in charge of the companies. The solution is to Regulate.

              The corruption is because we voters built the system to enable corruption. None of us are better than the executives or vice versa

          • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Did everyone forget about scumbag Martin Shkreli who raised medication prices for no reason other than he wanted more money?

            “In September 2015, Shkreli was widely criticized when Turing obtained the manufacturing license for the antiparasitic drug Daraprim and raised its price to insurance companies from $13.50 to $750.00 (USD) per pill.”

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              Martin worked at Retrophin and Turing Pharmaceuticals but mostly he was a hedge fund manager.

              Got nothing to do with Parker or Mangione.

    • Ænima@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They haven’t been since they got raked from COVID-19 and shutdowns tanking their stocks in 2020. So they price gouge with inflation and shrinkflation, keep prices high to make up the difference and fuck us over. Then they keep the prices artificially high, raising prices on entertainment, force people back to the office, and use those as talking points to tank democrat campaigns.

      They’ve been openly at war for the last 5-years or so. Just like Gaza, you can only trap people in misery for so long before they lose just enough to make it worth fighting back with violence. We’re on the cusp of that backlash and I have a feeling the next 4+ years are gonna see the blowup.