Shame it didn’t do well, I thought it was great.

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Didn’t they just announce a live service shooter? Isn’t that caving into current money-making models?

    • MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      We know one of their WIP titles is a PvE multiplayer game set in their connected universe. Aside from that, nothing more is known, except for your generic corporate “we’re excited about our future projects with Remedy” statements from 505.

      I’d be very suprised if Remedy turns around and makes it overtly exploitative.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Whether it’s any more exploitative than any other game, it’s still got all of the same baggage. It’s always online and will one day be unplayable, and it’s relying on continual revenue to support it rather than just selling it for an up front price and letting it rock, which both encourage exploitative monetization anyway.

        • MentalEdge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Ok. Unfortunately it sounds like you’re asking me to stop liking a studio that I like, based on speculation about how a future title of theirs might work. That’s not an actionable argument.

          Nothing about a multiplayer title requires it be made in a way that will break whenever the official servers go down. You are assuming this one will work that way, and I’ll grant you it likely will.

          But the change we both want isn’t going to come from voting with our wallets, but even harder.

          It’ll come from something like this.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m not asking you to stop liking a studio you like, but I am asking you to take them off of the pedestal you put them on. If you care about the SKG campaign, that new shooter of theirs is at odds with it.

            • MentalEdge
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              That pedestal being, that they keep making games that are just plain good, despite at the same time being involved with shit industry practices by working with Microsoft and Epic?

              I think that particular pedestal is pretty fucking deserved. And one that looks their faults in the eyes.

              They keep making good stuff, while marred by the bullshit that allows them to fund the studio.

              Why do you think I’m specifically excited for them to finally do something fully self-published, so they can make something I can enjoy with no fucking strings attached?