So a few months back I asked about you guys os in c/asklemmy, so this time I wanna ask about your desktops you use on this same account.
(I use kde but plan to move to cinnamon I find kde buggy and gnome tracker3 randomly broke for no reason so yh idk if these happened to anybody)

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    50 minutes ago

    I use KDE, no bugs for me (I found one but it’s already fixed in the latest update) and it’s feels like my second home

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    50 minutes ago

    Was a Gnome user until Gnome 3.

    Since Plasma 5, I use KDE Plasma.

    I’m just going to share my unvarnished opinions here, I clearly understand that Gnome users feel differently, and that’s okay.

    • Gnome 3 performance was objectively worse on every bit of hardware I tried than Plasma. (Unfortunately I had functional gripes with Plasma 4 so couldn’t use it.)
    • The years of faffing about I had trying to be happy with Gnome 3 and trying to use other alternatives until Plasma 5 was ready pretty much convinced me of this:
      • Gnome devs care more about achieving their vision of how a desktop should be used than they do about accommodating users who might feel differently. This is my perception, and it’s a deeply held opinion. No matter how strongly you feel I’m wrong, you aren’t going to change my mind. You can come at me if you want, but it’s going to bear no fruit.
      • KDE devs have a vision, but place nearly equal importance on ensuring their users can make different choices if they choose. If this isn’t true, they do a damn good job of pretending it is, and that’s good enough for me. 🙂
    • I’m unhappy with the degree to which it appears the Gnome team has actively worked against the ability for users to easily customize, and with various feature removals that at this point are so far in my past that I probably don’t remember the specific things that pissed me off, but I remember their explanations for feature removals being salt in an open wound every last time I cared enough to investigate their stated reasons.

    Plasma 6 does everything I want the way I want. I have loaded it (and Plasma 5) on very low end and very high end hardware and found it performant and functional on both, consistently.

    You’ll note I don’t claim it to be the best. There are folks out there for whom the Gnome vision happens to be how they like to work, or who aren’t bothered by whatever hoops you have to jump through currently to customize a Gnome environment, and I’m sincerely happy for those people. For them, Gnome is the best.

    There are lots of other DEs and of course tiling WMs exist, but it takes me no time at all to have a fresh plasma install working the way I want my computer to work and looking the way I want it to look, and thus I literally have zero complaints. So for the past few years I haven’t even looked at any alternatives. If there’s ever a time that I don’t find the desktop product itself, and the KDE development team’s approach to desktop development, to be absolutely perfect fits for me, I’ll look elsewhere - but honestly probably not at Gnome.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    42 minutes ago

    I am extremely basic and I’m using the XFCE that came with Linux mint. I don’t need anything fancy.

  • grapemix@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    Enlightenment. It’s pretty and really fast. Of course you can’t complete with the speed of tile wm. But their development speed is so slow…

  • spacedout@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    47 minutes ago

    It’s hard to go back after Sway/I3 with pywal coloration, when everything is so sluggish in comparison. It’s amazing to see gnome and KDE adding like a second to launch/quit of common applications. Tried hyprland, but animations seemed choppy (beefy AMD desktop), has that changed?

  • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I use gnome on my main machines, but looking to migrate to cosmic, and I use xfce on more limited devices.

    I like the kde project, but I tend not to use it, because I find it a bit overwhelming, even after customizing it, it’s hard to explain. I have issues with too many elements in front of me.

      • The Doctor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        You can install more than one desktop environment at a time. Your login manager should let you pick which one you want to log into.

        • Mwas alt (prob)@thelemmy.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          yeah i think i like to try new desktops in vms more personally, but if i want 2 desktops at the same time then ok otherwise if i wanted to replace my desktop a full reinstall is better.

  • chrash0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    these days Hyprland but previously i3.

    i basically live in the terminal unless i’m playing games or in the browser. these days i use most apps full screen and switch between desktops, and i launch apps using wofi/rofi. this has all become very specialized over the past decade, and it almost has a “security by obscurity” effect where it’s not obvious how to do anything on my machines unless you have my muscle memory.

    not that i necessarily recommend this approach generally, but i find value in mostly using a keyboard to control my machines and minimizing visual clutter. i don’t even have desktop icons or a wallpaper.

    • TruePe4rl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      58 minutes ago

      Another i3 user here. I slowly transitioned from KDE when switching keyboard layout stopped working as well as some other DE related things.

      Ended up writing custom script for switching. Currently implemented with rofi in Perl, bc I like the syntax.

      I still like having a bit nice gui, so i have wallpapers, some icons, etc. But I fell in love with terminal along with neovim : ) , soo kinda looking for that middle ground between look, performance and functionality.

      Haven’t finished tweaking all the configs to my liking, but after that vanilla Arch is the direction I plan to go, since many things in my current install that I have as well as haven’t customized work a bit questionably or exist for no reason.

    • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m still on i3 as it’s been convenient, but this:

      this has all become very specialized over the past decade

      resonates. I keep incrementally adding personal tweaks and hotkeys to my setup, and I have all my dotfiles in a repo so it’s persistent across installations.

      One example was I made my headphone button pause/play videos with i3’s config:

      bindsym XF86AudioPlay exec playerctl play-pause
      

      But then I adopted a script to toggle mic mute on work Zoom meetings, so I combined it with the above - if I’m in a meeting it toggles mute, otherwise it play-pauses any current video. The script, for now:

      #!/bin/bash
      #
      # Handler script for hitting mute on the headphone.
      #
      
      CURRENT=$(xdotool getwindowfocus)
      ZOOM=$(xdotool search --limit 1 --name "Zoom Meeting")
      
      if [[ -n "$ZOOM" ]]; then
          # if zoom is active, toggle mic mute
          xdotool windowactivate --sync ${ZOOM}
          xdotool key --clearmodifiers "alt+a"
          xdotool windowactivate --sync ${CURRENT}
      else
          # otherwise do play/pause
          playerctl play-pause # will fail if no player found
      fi
      

      and of course I altered the i3 config to launch that script rather than playerctl directly.

  • The Doctor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’m running MATE on my laptop. It gives me what I need (a task bar, space for some instrumentation, the usual desktop functionality, a way to start applications) and nothing that I don’t care about (wobbling windows, compiz, stuff like that). My DE is a tool; I use tools that don’t get in my way because I have work to do.

    I might give COSMIC a try in a few months, I haven’t decided yet.

  • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    KDE, because it has all the features I need and also because I love theming and while QT apps can be themed pretty easily, GTK theming is somewhere between being absolutely horrible and non-existance.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Plasma.

    When I try Gnome, within a couple minutes I encounter the Save dialog that defaults the cursor to the Search field instead of the Filename field, and the top of my head goes spinning across the room, and I uninstall it.

    • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      XFCE4 ! Stable, simple and EndeavourOS’ design is top notch !

      However there are some glitches from time to time. Nothing to serious but when I use Lutris + Wine my desktop bar does some wired shit.

      Also when coming back from sleep I have to “pkill xfce4-session”. Though I’m not totally sure it’s an xfce issue…this could also be Nvidia or X11 related… Didn’t dived to deep.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    KDE Plasma because I can make it look, feel and work mostly like Windows. I have to use Windows at work and don’t want to have to think too hard about differences between computers I use at work vs. at home.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have mine look and work almost as exactly as Windows 10, which I really love in terms of UI/UX. It’s the most easiest and fastest desktop interface I’ve ever used so far.

      I have a tiled app menu and I even changed the window decorations to look like Windows 10. I hate rounded corners. It’s such a waste of screen space.

  • banshee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I currently use Gnome on my laptop, but I’ve toyed with returning to KDE for a while. I used KDE briefly back in the v3 and v4 days felt like it was a bit bloated compared to Gnome v1 and v2. Cinnamon is nice but a bit heavyweight on graphics. I should probably return to XFCE or Mate.