• Zeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    37 minutes ago

    Here are my top 5:

    • Being on their phone too much.
    • Being willfully ignorant.
    • Believing in religion.
    • Using proprietary social media apps (e.g. Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook).
    • Using non-free BIOS firmware / non-free software.
  • gramophone_mind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Svenska
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Being smarmy. I can’t stand people who are ready to manipulate anything out of people as they do it with their smarmy smirks.

  • AreolaGrundle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    People who make small talk with the cashier or service person when there is a line and people who accelerate in the turn lane.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I understand where you’re coming from, but it might just have been a simple accident and they’re too poor or don’t have the time to get it fixed. I went around with a shattered screen for about six months.

      • BambiDiego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That’s the exception for me. If the screen is cracked, but it bothers them I sympathize, but if it’s cracked and they throw their phone around and get mad as if it was the phone’s fault then I super, super judge them.

    • Trae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I have the same theory. Anytime I see someone having a phone call on speakerphone it’s almost 100% because their screen is shattered and they just walk around screaming into their phone.

      Makes sense that these are also the type of people walking around just raw dogging life with out a cell phone case.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Anyone calling themselves a “scientist”

        Biologist, astronomer, mathematicians, these are all valid professions.

        Scientist is not a profession.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ll keep an eye out for one, but in the meantime, I’ll be more specific about what I mean about ignoring how science actually is.

        One of the things I find most beautiful about science is how it thrives in uncertainty — great science is more likely to arise from a “huh, that’s strange…” than a big “Eureka” moment, not least of all because most breakthroughs involve large collaborations of researchers.

        “Scientism” is the term usually used for the kind of thing that irks me. I’m realising now that I feel unequipped to properly explain that, so I’m going to point to a video I like on this matter by a cardiologist and science communicator I like: https://youtu.be/CVPy25wQ07k

        • billwashere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’ve got a great example. My wife and I argue about directions all the time. I usually think Google and Apple maps are going to give me the quickest route because it’s an algorithm based on more data than I currently have like traffic and current road conditions. She’s usually all about her “gut” feeling and it involves these very convoluted paths that involve way too many extra intersections and very unknown conditions like others thinking the exact same thing and making it way more congested. I wasn’t even going to get into things like game theory since that would be way over her head. She very smart just not about nerdy things like that. Anyway I was like fine, ok let’s test it. Let’s see which way is quicker. Of course no two situations are going to be exact given changing variables like traffic patterns, times of day, construction, etc. but given enough data we could definitely prove which way is better: her gut feeling or taking the suggested route from the appropriate app. That’s science. Come up with a hypothesis, then a method to test the hypothesis, and then do the test. In this case it’s pretty simple to figure out if it works. You’re just comparing times. But nope, doesn’t wanna do it. And she’s all about the science. During COVID she even said we should be doing what the epidemiologists and doctors suggest since they “have done the science”. Here’s a chance for use to do a very simple version of that same thing.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago
    • People who take phone calls with it on speaker
    • People that have anything on speaker while in a public place
    • Wearing “MAGA” clothing
    • Having a cyber truck
    • Leaving large gaps in the drive thru queue
    • People with young children that they dress up like little adults.
    • People who refuse to learn basic tech (email, texting, etc.)
    • Edit: People that don’t like animals, or they dislike just cats. I feel like people who don’t vibe with animals in some way are… Off.

    damn, I’m a judgy bitch

  • Derrick@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Disheveled hair. If you have long(ish) hair and you’re going out in public, at least drag a comb through it so you don’t look like a bed-head.

  • freeman@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    People who are using their cellphone/mobile as a telefon (calling someone) but not holding it as a telephone but as a slab in front of their face. And ofc with the speaker on.

    Slightly better but still stupid: Videocalling (or Facetiming) with the phone right in front of their nose.

    I mean, just hold the phone so that the speaker is at your ear and the mic is right by your mouth…

  • filcuk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    ‘It has chemicals in it’

    This use of ‘chemicals’ as something inherently bad just makes it sound like they’re parroting some scaremongering tiktok.

    • Default_Defect@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I had this talk with a member of my family. Water is a chemical, salt is a chemical. Just because you don’t immediately know what it is, doesn’t mean its bad.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m sure they know, but maybe this is word drift or shorthand for “harmful chemicals”. That’s a lot more plausible than literally turning “literally” into its opposite

        • Default_Defect@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s more of a lack of understanding of chemistry, this chemical compound contains something harmful in another form, but it is completely harmless in the form that it takes in this food or vaccine, etc.

  • Zoidberg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    People who don’t like cats.

    I’ve noticed a correlation between people who don’t like cats and having narcissistic or selfish tendencies. Could be just an impression but that’s how I feel.

    • pixelscript@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I love cats. Other peoples’ cats.

      I will never own my own cat because I don’t want to accept the burden of responsibility that responsible pet ownership demands.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I don’t like cats, mainly for two reasons:

      1. I am allergic and they just make me feel bad on a physical level
      2. Cats, as any animals, require care, and responsible owners add it to the list of their burdens. It’s like constantly having a baby that never grows up - cats can wake you up in the middle of the night, force you to remove feces, etc.

      I, however, love people, and am far from being selfish or narcissistic. People around me often find me warm, comforting, and supportive.

    • halfeatenpotato@lonestarlemmy.mooo.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Huh, I kinda feel the opposite. You need (or at least SHOULD) be very attentive to a pup. Dogs, in general, tend to crave/require more attention. Cats are more hands-off, so they often attract the kinda people who want a pet for the sake of having a pet - which tend to be narcissistic types.*

      *not true of all cat people

      • Zoidberg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Interesting. My reasoning is that narcissistic people crave attention, which cats may not give so overtly as a dog. Basically for a dog, a person is a god and some people love that kind of relationship.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’ve definitely seen multiple people talk about how they view it as a red flag when people like dogs but not cats because cats are mean. Their reasoning is that dogs will love you no matter what but cats have to want to get attention. The argument is that people don’t understand boundaries/consent.

          I see their logic, but I think it’s looking a bit too far into it. Yellow flag maybe, not red.

          • pahlimur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            This is my narcissistic neighbor’s behavior. He has 2 dogs, but he treats them like objects and not as part of the family. He absolutely hates cats for no real reason.

            It’s a massive red flag. I had to help his ex wife escape from him because he’s a DARVO type abuser.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              We really don’t deserve dogs, they’re too precious. Meanwhile, if you’re a jerk to a cat they’ll hate you a lot faster than a dog does lol.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Someone who doesn’t like cats is a red flag for me for one simple reason:

            I have cats! They’re not going anywhere, either, so this probably isn’t going to work out lol.

      • meneervana@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        In my experience dog owners often like to control another being, cat owners like to just let others be.

  • TastyWheat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Shit Parking.

    If you’re driving a 2 ton metal box and can’t have the spatial awareness to fit it into a large rectangle, you shouldn’t be on the road.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Their choices with tech, choices in consumerism (Stanley Cups hype, hypebeast brands, Temu shit, etc), not using blinkers, amount of time spent staring at phones, hobbies

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Thats the point of this whole post isnt it? The things we probably shouldnt but do anyway