We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the …

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Honestly I’d say the Internet isn’t safe, and it’s because of Google, fuck you Google. It’s not just the wine I’ve been drinking, it’s true dammit.

  • geography082@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    People you can still block the shit of using DNS Adblockers . There are a some free like Mullvad DNS and Adguard.

    • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      That’s not as effective, since it can’t block anything that’s hosted from a hostname that also serves regular content without also blocking the regular content. It also can’t trick websites into thinking that nothing is blocked and it can’t apply cosmetic rules. I use it for my devices, but in browsers I supplement it with uBlock Origin (or whatever is available in that browser).

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Also Firefox mobile has nearly all of the extensions as the desktop version so it’s more similar across all of your devices. Personally, I use LibreWolf on desktop and Mull on mobile, but they’re just tweaked versions of Firefox with some bloat and telemetry removed and preconfigured to be more private.

    • Madis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      57 minutes ago

      We will now [Oct 9] begin disabling installed extensions still using Manifest V2 in Chrome stable. This change will be slowly rolled out over the following weeks. Users will be directed to the Chrome Web Store, where they will be recommended Manifest V3 alternatives for their disabled extension. For a short time, users will still be able to turn their Manifest V2 extensions back on. Enterprises using the ExtensionManifestV2Availability policy will be exempt from any browser changes until June 2025.

      https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate/mv2-deprecation-timeline#october_9th_2024_an_update_on_manifest_v2_phase-out

      So there is no single date for normal users, but June 2025 is fixed for enterprise (and expected date for Brave, Vivaldi)

  • funkforager@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You can make a windows registry change to have Chrome let you keep using uBlock Origin, with the V2 manifest. It will buy you six more months, basically the enterprise support period.

    There was a handy shortcut created by the Security Now podcast you can use as a one-click file to update the policy. The show notes also give a more detailed breakdown of what’s going on.

    The relevant section in the notes is page 10. The link to the file is page 12. https://www.grc.com/sn/sn-995-notes.pdf

  • reksas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    After i uninstalled chrome some time ago, i noticed it had been slowing down my entire system even when its not on. There is nothing of worth in using it or any other browser derived from it.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    You can always keep Chromium installed for the odd site that doesn’t work in Firefox (my daily driver). I do web development and test in every browser and I almost never encounter sites or features that don’t work in FF. The only one I can recall is something in the Azure Portal, probably because Microsoft wants you using Edge.

    Typically, Safari is the laggard and any developer worth their salt would make sure their site works on iPad and iPhone. When a new web standard is released, usually Chromium supports it first but even then, not always. And web developers usually don’t use features that aren’t implemented across the board yet. I know I go to caniuse.com before I use something fresh out the oven.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      be sure to check out the extensions, there’s several that are game changers.

    • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      No, HVEC / H.265 codec support so no modern 4K security camera or plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support.

      • wax@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Probably no ads on your self-hosted frigate/jellyfin pages though, so you can just keep using chrome for that ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Jellyfin

        Use the desktop client or jellyfin-mpv-shim and you’ll get HEVC support and superior image quality.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        According to caniuse.com, it works now in the Nightly builds and can be enabled in other builds via the media.wmf.hevc.enabled pref in about:config.

        I use Firefox Dev Edition and I think it’s enabled there. But either way, you can enable it on stable.

        • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Night, windows only, and needs to be enabled with about: config… ie it almost has some support maybe. Also doesn’t work via webrtc so it doesn’t actually help me with the viewing the security cam feeds.

            • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Core web app compatibility vs … “enhanced” ad blocking. MS teams and some other business tools also don’t support Firefox but work fine in Chrome and Safari.

              It is something the Firefox team needs to work on again. I used Firefox from when it was released until Chrome came out and mopped the floor with it. At the time Firefox became the bloated beast and went through a reset.

              Unfortunately trying to have a firm stance on not implementing HVEC when they no longer had the largest market share was a bad move and they seem to be slowly back tracking on that.

              • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 hours ago

                MS Teams not working as well in Firefox is a “we want you using Edge or Chrome” Microsoft issue, not a Firefox issue.

                You wouldn’t believe the amount of enterprise-sector MS websites that have went from works fine on Firefox to completely broken on anything but Chrome very quickly after Edge became Chrome with a lick of paint.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support

        H265 isn’t the only option there. AV1 is great and fully supported by Jellyfin (and I imagine Plex?)

        • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          H.265 is the defecto standard on Security cameras, and I am not going to migrate content to AV1 that is already in H.265.

            • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Not when you are using an NVR with scrubbing and everything in the web UI. https://frigate.video/

              All in all it would be an inconvenient workaround for something that already works seamlessly across Safari, Edge, Chrome etc.

                • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  How is giving a sober and straightforward explanation of why he can’t use Firefox “bitching”? The simple fact is “switch to Firefox” isn’t a solution for everyone in every case. Burying your head in the sand about that benefits nobody.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Jellyfin can handle the transcoding to AV1 where needed. Albeit that’s a bit less ideal than direct play as you need the hardware to transcode.

            • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Not spending hundreds to upgrade my server to support 4K to 4K transcoding. Even accelerated on a VERY recent CPU or GPU Encoding in AV1 is costly while at the same time decoding H.265.

              Again Essentially every major browser supports HVEC now, other than Firefox.

              • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                If it’s a personal machine in which you have a choice on browser why not just use one of the native Jellyfin apps?

                major browser supports HVEC now, other than Firefox.

                Every other major browser is an overcommercialized pile of crap (or built atop the same) that can afford to pay for the licenses to use HEVC or has no qualms shipping proprietary code with their software that they don’t control.

                Also apparently on Windows you can enable experimental HEVC hardware decoding support. You’ll need to install “HEVC Video Extensions” (from Microsoft themselves) ($0.99) in the Windows App Store and toggle “media.wmf.hevc.enabled” in about:config.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    We kept Firefox alive for you all these years. You’re welcome.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I hope Lina Kahn goes after them for this BS. They have a monopoly on the browser market and they’re exploiting that to further their own interests in the advertising industry.

  • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Honest question here, since chromium (vs chrome) is open source, can someone not fork an older version, or remove the new code blocking ublock?

    I mean i assume it cant be done, but i dont know why

    • 4z01235@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It can be done, but then whoever forks that will need to stay on top of keeping that fork up to date with other changes in the original chromium, and that gets harder and harder to do as time goes on and more changes are made to the same or related parts of the codebase.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        And you have to know that if anyone actually tried, they would dedicate their infinite resources to making that as difficult as humanly possible.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Google: We changed a color

          Fork Developer: they changed a color and it caused 50,000 breaking changes that a diff tool can’t handle automatically wtf.

          Google: sorry wrong color here’s a new one

          Fork developer: another 100,000 breaking changes that a diff can’t handle?!?!

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t know why either. What I do know is that most Chromium browsers that are not Chrome have ad-blocking built into the browser itself using the same strategies as uBo but not reliant on Mv2 or Mv3 because they’re not extensions.