“The referendum outcome means Switzerland will follow France, which banned wearing a full face veil in public in 2011. Full or partial bans on wearing face coverings in public are also in place in Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark and the Netherlands.”
well likely because facial recognition technology they try to be the new normal we demand a ban to surveillance technology on public spaces.
join the movement for a ban on facial recognition
Welp I’m not old enough to sign the petition what can I do?
Share with your friends who are old enought, and tell everyone you know that’s a good start
A recent study by the University of Lucerne put the number of women in Switzerland who wear a niqab at 21 to 37, and found no evidence at all of women wearing the burqa, which women were forced to wear in Afghanistan under the Taliban.
So it doesn’t look like a big problem. I’m more concerned about protesters not being able to stay anonymous.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Nowhere in the law does it mention burqas or whatever. It bans non-medical face coverings altogether. That’s a bad thing, as it paves the way for the widespread use of facial recognition systems.
But the law isn’t racist. It’s simply just stupid.
Removed by mod
- Muslims aren’t a race. They are a religion. You can only be racist against a race. But I’m nitpicking here
- Who made the law does not matter. There is nothing specifically against muslims in the law.
I read the entire article. I know who made it, the intent might’ve been racist but the law itself isn’t.
Removed by mod
What is that kind of tyranny where the State dictates how we should dress ourselves?!
Making some rules regarding how people dress isn’t automatically tyranny. And, do you support a (pretty misogynist) religion to tell women they will got to hell if they don’t wear certain types of clothing?
A recent study by the University of Lucerne put the number of women in Switzerland who wear a niqab at 21 to 37, and found no evidence at all of women wearing the burqa, which women were forced to wear in Afghanistan under the Taliban.
Another quote from the article. This law will affect 0.00043% of the population as far as muslims go.
TBH this law feels like an anti-protester law that exploited the population’s dislike of muslims to pass.
Removed by mod
Believe me, I’m not fond of any religion either. I’m not saying this is a good law or that it’s good. I just think that currently protesters are hurt much more by this law than muslims.
I do agree with you mostly, I just think that even if muslims were the target of this law they weren’t the people hurt the most by it.
Either way this law is very dumb.
Indeed. They also maintain a firm grip on the countries they ravaged, by propping dictators. See Senegal protests this week against French companies: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/7/pressure-mounts-on-senegals-president-after-deadly-protests
Removed by mod
I wonder if people are still allowed to wear medical masks?
You would know if you had read the article…
How can you expect people to actually click on the link?