• Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 months ago

    But seeing how “gamers” react on social medias, wishing ill-fate to companies and people alike is sad.

    It’s the fans!

    What is even more revolting, is coming on LinkedIn and seeing the same comments from people within the industry.

    And the industry! Not us, it can’t be us!

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I can’t explain how stupid this is.

    He posted this on LinkedIn, openly attacking customers.

    Businesses hate when you attack the hand that feeds them.

    This dude is cooked.

    Edit: looks like he deleted it. Good. Jesus Christ people, stop venting on LinkedIn. You’re not taking a stand, you’re looking like a moron.

  • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Of course these millionaire executives are so disconnected from reality that they blame the customer for their failures.

    That’s a healthy take from upper management, if I’ve ever seen one. /s

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I only wish ill fate for the companies. At least ill enough to wake the fuck up and realise a company that sells games should never have a monetisation director.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Companies”. As if it’s some nebulous organism that’s alive, as if the building it encompasses is independent of action.

        Despite what some kangaroo american court, “Companies” are not living, independent people. They’re made of people. And if a company does something shitty or acts toxic, that’s because of the people who run it. The building, the logo, the “company” isn’t what deserves I’ll fate wished up - it’s the assholes like the monetization director.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes and no.

          You can’t blame the director of monetization for doing his job. You can blame the owner and the board of directors for going that route.

          Those decision makers are what I mean when I call out the company, not the developer that’s just doing what he’s paid for.

            • vxx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              You wouldn’t need a monetization CEO then when the mission wasn’t to implement sleazy and addicting tactics.

          • shani66@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yes you can? I could probably find a job kicking homeless people, that wouldn’t mean i wasn’t an awful person for taking that job. I get doing bad things to make a bag when you’re desperate, but that dude is no doubt a rich prick that could easily retire by now.

  • PDFuego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    The tweet linked in the article is from a dude who bitches about the “uglification of women” in games and Ubisoft being too focused on DEI. The post the article is about is clearly talking about people like him. The fact that there’s only one other comment here calling this out tells me either nobody actually looked into this at all because you’re all too excited to dogpile Ubisoft and don’t even care why, or you agree. Both are worrying.

    • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      People can be correct about something for the wrong reasons.

      This guy is a bellend, there’s plenty of reasons to cheer on the demise of Ubisoft without having to be a “DEI is in the room with us” obsessive like Grummz, and ignoring that because it’s easier to call the people who don’t like you chuds shows a similar level of detachment from reality.

      Ubisoft’s fuckups are too numerous to list, and the latest one was indeed too fall for a swindler who convinced them to try and sell one of the least marketable ideas in history, but the volume of sales lost is not in the same order of magnitude as the politically obsessed lunatics online on either side of this conversation, blaming them is like blaming sharks for all animal related deaths.

  • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Assassin’s Creed Shadows, which quickly gained controversy for numerous allegations that Ubisoft was mispresenting Japanese heritage through unpopular artistic design choices

    I love how they danced around G"mers being racist sacks of shit, because otherwise you might feel sympathetic.

  • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s time big studios start firing these soulless assholes instead of the developers and crew that put their effort and love in their work.

    • vgaOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      If people would stop buying these shits, the problem would fix itself.

  • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ubisoft went to the Disney School of Free Marketing.

    1)Make a subpar product featuring IP that people care about.

    2)Fabricate controversy about a character on social media.

    3)Call customers bigots.

    4)Tell people “it’s not for you!”

    5)Blame flop on bigot fans.

    6)Repeat

    7)Profit I guess?

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lol these clowns. They’ll have to come up with a whole new song & dance routine if they ever expect another red cent from me.

    Eh. Maybe in a -90% sale.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t see where gamers are referred to as non decent humans. But I have reading comprehension so maybe the article isn’t aimed at me.

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have twitter links blocked, so it was hard to get to the original source for me too, but this is it:

      It makes somewhat more sense in context. He’s not calling all gamers scum, he saying “gamers” (in scare quotes) that root for the downfall of companies and harass people on social media are not decent people.

      There’s still some room to disagree with him, but it’s not as bad as the top headline makes it out to be.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m sure we can all agree this guy’s position wouldn’t even have existed if Ubisoft wasn’t so damn greedy for every extra cent they can take from their customers.

      • mhague@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Sorry, I was throwing shade at how they twisted their words. The person is talking about people who go on LinkedIn and boast about Ubisoft failing “directly” to the employees. Not really a ‘gamers are the problem and that’s why we failed’ but a ‘hey everybody, stop talking about our failures and look over there at these terrible people’