• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m voting both pragmatically and with my conscience by voting for Claudia De La Crúz. The Democrats can gain my vote by sanctioning Israel or taking similar measures.

    • dwemthy@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What’s pragmatic about voting for a long shot candidate in a system that so heavily favors the two major parties?

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Removing legitimacy from the system itself, and forcing the DNC to appeal to the left if they wish to gain more votes, rather than allow them to get away with genocide.

        • dwemthy@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The same DNC that blamed the left for Hillary losing and then credited centrism with Biden winning?

          Those are fine goals, but pragmatism involves addressing reality as it is, not how you would like it to be. I doubt you can achieve both removing legitimacy from the system as you see it and forcing the DNC to speak to the left simultaneously since the DNC is a part of the system that’s in place. Unfortunately the DNC appealing to the left needs to be a two way street, make the left more appealing to the DNC than the right. All those Republicans endorsing Harris is the right appealing to the DNC, the left needs to out do that effort to pull the DNC to the left. Rejecting them won’t do that, only the opposite.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The same DNC that blamed the left for Hillary losing and then credited centrism with Biden winning?

            Yes. They can continue to blame, but they will continue to lose.

            Those are fine goals, but pragmatism involves addressing reality as it is, not how you would like it to be. I doubt you can achieve both removing legitimacy from the system as you see it and forcing the DNC to speak to the left simultaneously since the DNC is a part of the system that’s in place. Unfortunately the DNC appealing to the left needs to be a two way street, make the left more appealing to the DNC than the right. All those Republicans endorsing Harris is the right appealing to the DNC, the left needs to out do that effort to pull the DNC to the left. Rejecting them won’t do that, only the opposite.

            This is peak liberalism, lmao. The DNC is pulling right because of their donors, if they think they can win without the left then that is their miscalculation.

            • dwemthy@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Lol, yes. There are metaphorical carrots pulling the DNC to the right, I think we agree there. Now if you want to be “pragmatic” about it will a metaphorical stick from the left move them more left, or more right given the way we can see they calculate?