• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even the captain himself said it wasn’t a war crime, and they were legitimate targets.

  • Saganaki@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The issue in question was that Britain designated a specific area around the Falklands as a “no sail zone” and the destroyer was outside that area. It was sailing directly into towards the zone, however.

    Even so: As mentioned elsewhere, the captain of said ship even said he was a legitimate target.

    EDIT Shit, this is NCD….all according to plan? Destroyer upgraded to submarine.

    • deegeese
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah we were fighting but my warship was in the “no-tagsies” safe zone.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was probably to stop the conflict evolving into a nuclear war tbf.

  • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Caption was before image so I had to wonder, who? Yeah, no country wants to admit thier wars or pay the price