Hellfire103@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前stoplocklemmy.caimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up1602arrow-down1192
arrow-up1410arrow-down1imagestoplocklemmy.caHellfire103@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前message-square139fedilink
minus-squarethanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down1·3 个月前Well it certainly gave us alot to chew on.
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·3 个月前 alot Do notional creatures count?
minus-squareMelodiousFunk@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·3 个月前“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic. No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
minus-squareNightwatch Admin@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·3 个月前 No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly. So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
minus-squareAurenkin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 个月前I would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.
minus-squarethanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 个月前Of course, they are very important!
Well it certainly gave us alot to chew on.
Do notional creatures count?
“Chew on”, in this case, is a figure of speech meaning “think about,” typically in a different light than previously afforded on the topic.
No one would actually eat an alot. Alots are intelligent and friendly.
So are pigs, unlike humans. Still, eating pigs is generally accepted, while eating humans is not.
I would say it depends on the human. Same reason why I only eat jerk chicken.
There are exceptions.
Maybe for you
Pigs are delicious tho
Of course, they are very important!