• thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    i mean civ is never really worth buying until they put out a complete edition with all the features they removed so they could slowly sell them back to you as dlc.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think they really do that. I remember Civ 6 launching with everything 5 had as DLC in base game and the DLCs added new things 5 didn’t have.

      • Vathsade@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think 6 had religion or a bunch of stuff originally, it had less content than 5 at launch (forget the civs, just the mechanics). That was fixed in the first major update.

        I’d expect a year or 2 before we can start seeing 7 become the full game it needs to get to to pass 6.

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          it was diplomacy that was stripped then re-added this time. in base civ 6 there was no diplomacy. that’s ridiculous. that’s like one of the most core mechanics and win conditions. then when they did add it it was so busted that you’ll often accidentally get a diplo victory on your way to any other victory.

        • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          6 definitely had religion at launch. IGN actually declared “This game will go down in history as the most fully-featured launch version in the 25-year series.”

          • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            that’s a weird thing to say about a game that came out without diplomacy or diplomatic victories. but ign has a long history of overating games from waelthy companies.

            edit: but also, the way that ign feels the need to praise it for being fully featured at launch when it was still missing a base mechanic really helps my point. they always do this. this may actually be the least bad one they’ve ever done. that’s just a low bar. like the 4th least bad release.

            idk man… i guess In today’s market this behavior has become less bad by comparison to everyone else, but I’m not going to ignore the rising temperature of the water in this pot. the whole industry is getting worse. I’m not going to give this company ground to legitimize their greed because the rest of the industry shot past them in shittyness. this was one of the first series to explicitly be scummy with dlc. they helped create the modern landscape of battle passes and gacha bullshit. they were once some of the worst out there…

            • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Sure but the fully fleshed out diplomatic victory in Civ V was only added by DLC, it’s not that crazy that the equivalent was a DLC in VI. Beyond that, things like religion, archaeology, and espionage were all DLC features in V but were base game in VI. It was a clear step forward on the whole.

        • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Fair enough, I forgot it didn’t launch with the world Congress stuff. It has enough other new stuff and a bunch of features from Civ 5 that at least for me it made up for that being left behind at first.

        • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Eh I don’t really count civs I guess. I was just counting features like religion and stuff like that. The civs are usually pretty cheap and they don’t really change the game that much.

    • jorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      I find this argument really annoying / entitled.

      Are they supposed to increase the scope of every iteration in the series and take an extra few years to make each one, or are they supposed to never release DLC? which would make you happy?

      • mako@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think you accurately read their comment.

        They’re not spending years in development planning and creating new, exciting content. They’re holding back basic features from the beginning and selling them to you over time for many times the base game’s price.

        • jorp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes because it’s a new game, putting all the features they developed in the previous base game and years of DLC would take them a long time. This is how software development works. They don’t just have everything feature toggled off…

          • sour@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You make it sound like they start from scratch with every new game.

            • jorp@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              3 months ago

              Many core mechanics are different in each game, and even if they kept the code identical for the DLC mechanics the bulk of the work is asset creation, balancing, etc.

              There’s no universe in which you’re right

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I would like it to come out with the same number of win conditions that the previous ones had. diplomacy was a base feature in at least the last 2 games before it. it wasn’t a dlc feature before. they removed it this time, then added it back as dlc. they do shit like that every time.

  • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    3 months ago

    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand there it vanishes from my Wishlist. Thought after Civ 5 it might be actually something potentially worth buying, but nope. Removing the Launchers just to add Denuvo… What an absolute dumbass move.

  • hitagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m gonna wait for the platinum ultimate mega collector’s anthology edition at a 90% discount after 7 years.

      • kbal@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That was true for a little while around 2016 I think. If it’s temporarily true again now I don’t expect it’ll last very far into the lifetime of a civ game.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Maybe, maybe not. HiFi Rush hasn’t been cracked, even after Microsoft became theevillain of the week for the whole internet, because they closed down Tango Gameworks.

            • Perfide@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Nah man, she’s gone. She hasn’t cracked anything in over a year, and the “one game” she’d be interested in cracking she won’t crack?

              Until she actually releases a new crack, I’m not going to believe that post was even actually from her. Either that or it is her and she’s unable to crack the newest denuvo and is blustering to keep her cults attention.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Is that really true? I guess I’m not up to date enough, but I think most modern games make their way to the modern seas.

        • Perfide@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s true. There was only one person willing and capable of cracking denuvo, and they’ve been a total ghost for a year now. Possibly a literal ghost now, considering they’re Russian.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh. Well I was excited about Civ 7 right until this moment.

    Anti-tamper = no mods worth your time = only worth playing a handful of times. Also may have trouble working on Linux.

    • LordWarfire@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve also removed from my wish list - hopefully they reverse the decision and I can add it back.

  • hakase@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There hasn’t been a need for a new Civ since IV so I already wasn’t gonna buy it, but now I’m gonna not buy it even harder.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I play freeciv (an open source civ 3.5 clone) much more often than civ 5 which I bought. I’ll agree with you. Newer civ isn’t all that attractive.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah… Civ 1, 2, 3, and 4 were all good - for different reasons. Civ 5 was where the design decisions stopped being about gameplay and started being about maximising profit. Making the game functional and fun was lower priority to making paid DLC. Players buy the buggy and unfinished game… then pay more to fix it piecemeal with the DLC. Such is the power of brands and advertising.

  • On one hand, the gameplay doesn’t usually change so drastically that a new version matters too much.

    On the other, if they did dramatically change up the gameplay it might suck.

    So even though they have a decent track record and I love Civilization, I would never pre-order or buy day 1. I’ll wait and see if it’s actually worth getting. I will also say, in my experience, like 90% of games that used Denovu have not been good in the first place. I can name only 1 I thought was worth its cost, and I only got it after they removed the DRM (Lies of P).

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Judging from the gameplay reveals it seems that they changed some pretty fundamental stuff that makes CIV, CIV. So it will be interesting to see what it’s like.