Andor was more poliyical than anything before in Star Wars. And even there, they had anarchists. (But yeah, they lean towards the system that got them the empire)

I don’t think that there’s anything close to a positively defined political agenda in the original text. At least none that were there on purpose.

Tatsache! 21 bis 4 Uhr im Sommer, bis 6 Uhr im Winter.

22 bis 6 Uhr wär meine Schätzung, wegen den Ruhezeiten.

Ist so geregelt, dass die Arbeitende (Wortspiel nicht beabsichtigt) Bevölkerung sich auch ausruht. In den Zeiten darf glaub ich keine Hausdurchsuchungen durchgeführt werden.

Und die beim Arbeitsamt haben ja Arbeitsschutz. /s

Edit: zusätzlichen Kontext und Sarkasmus hinzugefügt.

Except the rebels want to restore a democracy in the Original Trilogy.

Technically, it’s never stated which form of government (if any) the rebellion wants to create after the empire is gone.

Or you could, you know: go outside and talk to people IRL? (touching grass, as it were)

The miyoo Mini should be able to emulate Playstation, so #inal Fantasy VII (and if you’re into those: VIII and IX) are on the table. But they needed modifications to be viable for modern audiences (9999HP + Lvl 99, triple speed, no random encounters, etc.)

Check out the Quintet games (Soul Blazer, Illusion of Gaia, Terranigma) for some relatively unknown classics.

Also check out some mods for the games. Terranigma for example benefits a lot from a rebalancing mod.

Especially the gameboy zelda titles (Oracle of Seasons and Ages) are bangers (and prefer them over minish cap).

I mehn: he can fly, teleport and is basically a god, isn’t he? Doesn’t seem out of place for him not needing a spacesuit.

… Goku needs a spacesuit? O.o

(But that joke hypothesis doesn’t hold cuz they’re all les and t4t…)

High-school reunion? More like re-yuri-on, amirite?

… I’ll see myself out

We’re not calling for inaction. Quite the opposite.

If you employ language where you lament people voting and even call them sheep when they don’t adhere to politics you condone worthy, you’re more cynical about elections than OP.

Why do you complain about people refraining from attending elections if these people made up their minds that it’s inconsequential. That’s hating on the players, not the game.

Ratatouille! ❤️

If voting would change anything, they would’ve made it illegal.

Really cool! What’s the wick made out of?

ikr

Isn’t it the left the expectation during ovulation?

Anarchy is authoritarian, anarchists just don’t know it.

I’m sorry, but you prove you have no idea about anarchism. The whole philosophical field of anarchism is based on power analysis, so it’s quite the feat for you to prove such a wild claim.

Yes, some people have natural talents in In general, the thing you call “leadership”: coordination or persuation of others. Or they have a talent in tactics and strategy. (Although people do like to have a say in the things your leaders decide - they just dislike the burden of responsibility)

But anarchists don’t deny that fact. Quite the opposite: they aim for social structures where people with these talents can’t accumulate structural hierarchies and monopolize decision making power.

Hate to be that guy, but you simply have no idea what you’re talking about.

That’s the entire reason so many people are attracted to fascism.

Umm…no. People are drawn to fascism, because they have a nationalistic worldview, where their nation is constructed for their benefit and their natiod is superior to other nations. That belief contradicts with a real-life lowering of living standard: “If the nation is there for my benefit and it should be at the top, why is my life still so miserable? Must be the weak people which sleazily spoil the true glory of our nation: the queers/transes/foreigners/Sinti/Roma/jews.” Additionally, there’s the belief that democracy wwakens the glory of the nation, so it needs a supreme leader which brings it back on track.

So, no: People not wanting to take “leadership” (or rather: responsibility) is **definetly not “the entire reason” why people are attracted to fascism. That makes historically absolutely no sense at all.

Leaders will emerge in your anarchist paradise, and people will follow.

I’m not talking about a utopia, but of strategies to achieve a more liberatory world. And these strategies prevent such monopolization of power.

Without liberalism as a check on their power, the very first crisis that comes along will turn anarchy directly into fascism.

What exactly do you mean by these words? I don’t believe that you have a coherent definition of any of the terms “liberalism”, “anarchy” and “fascism”. And if yes: how is “liberalism” supposed to keep power in check. Last time I checked, liberalism guarantees the power of the powerful by guaranteeing private property and the continued accumulation of wealth.

For reference, I point to all the people in HOAs.

I’m not really too familiar with that concept, since I don’t live in the US. But aren’t these things more or less only liked by people who want to maintain/improve their property value and universally hated? Or at least universally hated if they’re not democratically managed?

Even to get to anarchy in the first place is going to require authoritarianism.

sigh Please define what you mean with “authoritarianism”, because we definetly don’t agree on terms here. Authoritarianism (by my definition) is a social structure that tends to monopolize decision making power. That is contradictory to anarchism.

You don’t make massive societal transformations without forcing it on people.

You don’t keep the current societal order upright without forcing it on people. You’re not talking about authoritarianism, you’re talking about violence, i.e. the imposition of one’s will over another. But violence will always exist. You’re just morally justifying a cop’s violence in favour of the status quo. Liberalism doesn’t have a problem with people starving because they don’t have any bread.

If I don’t want to live in anarchy, how are you going to force me?

You can always chose to subjugate yourself. But if you want to enact nonconsensual subjugation on others, they have the right to self-defence.

As if you have demonstrated evidence of any sort?

That’s literally what you said, my homie: “Those two things happeded at the same time” means it’s a correlation. Scientifically it’s your burden to proof that it’s actually a causal relation afterwards.

Yes, we have established that you disagree. Not that you have provided any evidence whatsoever that a lower minimum can be reached by another path

Yes. Better living standards have been reached outside the framework of liberal democracy. In fact: All significant improvements in living standards have been fought for outside the system. Examples are: Any successful, liberatory revolution. (Like the french one, or the German one.

And yeah, the totalitarian path to a better minimum has been tried multiple times. It didn’t work out so well.

I agree. That’s why I’m not an authoritarian, but an anarchist.

I’m just gonna ignore your campist gish-gallopping if you don’t even bother to skim the video. You’re not interested in engaging in critique that contradicts your worldview. Just like people in a cult would do.

The images very much embody what PRC is actually doing.

You still failed to explain what we’re actually seeing on the left. It’s visually indistinguishable from green capitalism, so you failed in using a picture to promote whatever the PRC is doing.

TIL tha green LEDs will safe the environment. /s

Edit: Lol, you posted the first thing you found when you googled Zapatista dissolution, didn’t you? The Zapatistas restructured their autonomous approach. They didn’t abandon autonomy. They still exist, therefore they didn’t fail.