The platform seemed to realize the rule “sex sells”. However, it appears that even though this decision was “suspended”, it enraged many content creators who are now considering alternative platforms.

  • Ninmi
    link
    73 years ago

    And for a good reason since people’s livelyhoods were on the line.

  • @Brattea@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    They know they will lose a bunch of money. Honestly their creators should punish them by not using them (edit) fans.ly (edit) is gonna take off anyway

      • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        33 years ago

        I am not sure that that is actually desirable. There are other functions that require actual business connections. Most notably, they need payments hooked up and a way of verifying age.

  • @greensand@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    But how are the investors miraculously appeased all of a sudden? Can’t believe the problem disappeared just like that. I wonder what the true reason behind this stunt was.

    /edit: Here’s what their official tweet @OnlyFans says: "Thank you to everyone for making your voices heard.

    We have secured assurances necessary to support our diverse creator community and have suspended the planned October 1 policy change.

    OnlyFans stands for inclusion and we will continue to provide a home for all creators."

    If OnlyFans stands for inclusion, what does Fansly stand for?