Hubi@feddit.org to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agoLinux Foundation Welcomes the Open Model Initiative to Promote Openly Licensed AI Modelswww.linuxfoundation.orgexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down15cross-posted to: stable_diffusion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1191arrow-down1external-linkLinux Foundation Welcomes the Open Model Initiative to Promote Openly Licensed AI Modelswww.linuxfoundation.orgHubi@feddit.org to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square16fedilinkcross-posted to: stable_diffusion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squaresmeg@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·3 months agoI think you might need to see a doctor
minus-squaressm@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·3 months agoclearly, it’s obviously pronounced jif
minus-squareBlaster M@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoBut then the other image format would have to be prounounced JPEJ
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·3 months agoNo mister/miss. Porn creation is one of the concerns about open models because they can’t even prohibit it in the license.
minus-squaresmeg@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 months agoDid you reply to the wrong comment?
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-23 months agoNo. I think the comment I replied to was supposed to mean that the person had issues with seeing sexual stuff everywhere. I disagreed because in this case porn creation is a legitimate concern.
minus-squaresmeg@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoThat’s not discussed in the article though, I think they were just seeing a (not really that) phallic logo
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoOh ok I really didn’t see that.
That’s a penis dot gif
I think you might need to see a doctor
clearly, it’s obviously pronounced jif
But then the other image format would have to be prounounced JPEJ
No mister/miss. Porn creation is one of the concerns about open models because they can’t even prohibit it in the license.
Did you reply to the wrong comment?
No. I think the comment I replied to was supposed to mean that the person had issues with seeing sexual stuff everywhere. I disagreed because in this case porn creation is a legitimate concern.
That’s not discussed in the article though, I think they were just seeing a (not really that) phallic logo
Oh ok I really didn’t see that.