• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    • 2002 - W Bush
    • 2018 - Trump
    • 2019 - Trump

    In contrast:

    • 2024 - Biden

    But sure, keep telling us how Democratic administrations not acting like right-wing criminal shitstain Republicans is “hypocritical”, but deliberately disregarding the vast difference in foreign policy between the two parties so you can screech “America bad!” even when it does the right thing somehow isn’t.

  • TheMinions@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sometimes a hypocrite is nothing more than a man in the process of changing. -Brandon Sanderson

    Just because someone did something horrible in the past it does not mean we cannot advocate for something good now.

    People can change, bit by bit, moment by moment. Sometimes it might even be for the better.

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      The US isn’t going to change. This is how they are. They meddle with the world and have been doing so throughout their history.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      The US isn’t a person though. It is a system that relies on imperialist domination in order to survive. Do you have evidence that the system has fundamentally changed away from that? Because that would be some pretty miraculous evidence.

    • The Spectre@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      USA hypocrisy is theatrics to get to make rules and order everyone around with a sanctimonious attitude.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is how I feel watching young American be mad at Israel for doing things that the Americans did to my people and never even apologized for

    • SinAdjetivos@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do you want to share those “eyebrow raising” numbers?

      Best summary I can find stating the elections were “rigged” is the report from the Carter center which uses almost entirely qualitative data or hearsay arguments to support the claim and conveniently forgets to mention any of the surrounding context around US interventionism.

      In contrast the argument for fair and open elections is well summarized in the report from the NLG delegation’s report which does a good job of providing quantitative data as well as useful context to support the conclusion it was fair.

      Can you provide those quantitave arguments from these “third party left-wing governments”? Because I am having a hard time finding any of them…

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Like I said, Lula, despite downplaying the relevance of the discrepancies, has encouraged the sharing of the full count. Along with Mexico and Colombia they’ve been pushing for the full count to be released while criticising the US for jumping to recognize the opposition as winners. Spain’s government, a coalition of social democrats, communists and populist leftists, has done pretty much the same thing. That seems to be the trend on left-leaning international governments at the moment.

        The most popular quantitative argument, beyond the huge discrepancy with the exit polls, is that the first results offered with 80% count show oddly round numbers with a single decimal each that match dividing the count of the two larger parties to the reported results and then rounding up the vote count to the closest integer. The back of the napkin math gives you a low p-value, with a 1 in 100 million chance of the numbers showing up as round as they are. This by itself doesn’t mean the result is false, but paired with the fact that the full count hasn’t been released, that the results used to call it were only at 80% of the full count --unusually low for how close the whole thing is, although they have produced more complete results by now-- and that Maduro wins with a narrow majority, rather than a plurality that would add legitimacy questions I do think it’s reasonable to ask for the full tally. This is Spanish nonpartisan (but left-leaning) organization maldita.es saying about as much, since US-based orgs seem to be fudnamentally disqualified around these parts. The opposition has also produced an alternate set of tallies, although nobody has verified those, to my knowledge.

        So yeah, the original 80% count results look weird to a reasonable observer, quantitatively and qualitatively. As time goes on, the lack of a recount or a full set of official count documents makes the possibility of reviewing the tally or recounting less productive, as it’s more likely for positions to entrench and for whatever is produced to not be given credence. Venezuela really doesn’t need any help for this to be a shitshow now, regardless of what happens or what the real count is.

        Again, I’m not from Venezuela and I don’t have a horse in this race, but as a left-leaning person in a place where the right frequently uses Maduro’s crap as a cudgel, I am not willing to endorse that guy on principle.

        Oh, and I don’t see much in the way of quantitative analysis on that NLG report. If anything I’m surprised by how partisan it reads, although I’m not familiar with their record for independence. In any case, I’m with Lula, AMLO, Sánchez and the rest on this, they should have released the count documentation from their supposedly fully automated system immediately.

        Anyway, I’m stepping off. This place is full of propaganda on an issue that I take no pleasure in discussing. This sucks on a fundamental level, and I have no intention of playing devil’s advocate on this issue, just like I don’t have any intention of acting as a Maduro surrogate. I’m not here to circlejerk or to make myself more bummed out by this than I already am.

  • lulztard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Terrorist nations gonna terrorist. The list of US-couped governments is pretty long.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m sure the superpower that fills the void will be the paragon of morality

      • FatherGascown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        At least it won’t be that fascist-filled shithole. There’s a hole in the world like a great black pit, and it goes by the name of 'Murica.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      As an empire, yes. That doesn’t mean we want American people to suffer (I say this as a European who also thinks European imperialist countries should suffer the same fate)

      • FatherGascown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree with you, but it’s also true that imperialism is way deeper rooted in the American forma mentis than it is in most European.