Brought to you by the Department of Erasing History.

  • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Not surprising. They archive information that powerful people would rather we forget monetise.

    FTFY

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s both. I’m sure Puff Daddy, and R Kelly would rather we forget all the horrible things they’ve done rather than make money off of it. At the same time the NYTimes and the Atlantic would love to make money off their articles about those two people.

        • Notyou
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Addition to what others have stated. He is in trouble for more than just one woman. There are many claiming, but Cassie was the first (I think) that accused him and got paid to not say anything. That made his civil suit with her go away, but the feds built up a case and busted on human trafficking amongst other things. His old employee has a bunch of recordings of illegal stuff.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        i actually doubt that. i bet of they could make money off of it woth no repercussions they would not give a single fuck.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        So we’re accusing P.Diddy and R. Kelley of DDOSing the Internet Archive, then?

            • Resonosity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              You’re either a troll or a dipshit. They introduced an example where both interests of removing information from the public forum and having the monopoly of reporting on that information work to undermine archiving. It is important for the truth and for public trust that we support Internet Archive and other archivists/historians.