Brought to you by the Department of Erasing History.

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s both. I’m sure Puff Daddy, and R Kelly would rather we forget all the horrible things they’ve done rather than make money off of it. At the same time the NYTimes and the Atlantic would love to make money off their articles about those two people.

      • Notyou
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Addition to what others have stated. He is in trouble for more than just one woman. There are many claiming, but Cassie was the first (I think) that accused him and got paid to not say anything. That made his civil suit with her go away, but the feds built up a case and busted on human trafficking amongst other things. His old employee has a bunch of recordings of illegal stuff.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      i actually doubt that. i bet of they could make money off of it woth no repercussions they would not give a single fuck.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      So we’re accusing P.Diddy and R. Kelley of DDOSing the Internet Archive, then?

          • Resonosity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            You’re either a troll or a dipshit. They introduced an example where both interests of removing information from the public forum and having the monopoly of reporting on that information work to undermine archiving. It is important for the truth and for public trust that we support Internet Archive and other archivists/historians.