• CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    185
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “I’ve never experienced it so you must just be imagining it” pretty much describes the conflict of every issue out there, from race to mental illness. Hell, even things like homelessness.

      • lugal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        7 months ago

        Don’t forget “I’ve suffered it and it wasn’t that bad so don’t pretend it is”

        • Klear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Which actually means “I’ve pretended to suffer it and you are probably too”.

          • lugal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            7 months ago

            “I experienced racism. I was called a potato once and seriously, it wasn’t as bad as all the n* pretend it is. Get over it.”

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sometimes it means “I did a thing in the past and don’t recognise the ways in which it has changed over time to become worse today than it was in my day”.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      exactly. empathy is the ability to realize other people have different experiences than you. to think about what it’s actaully like to be homeless.

      but people think it means ‘just agree with me and make me feel good, and if i feel bad for people i am a good person’

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Most people I know lack empathy for things like this. Even people I’ve grown up with my whole life.

        So that raises the question, is it something you’re inherently born with? As I don’t think I chose to be this way, but here we are. I find it interesting to think about.

        • XTL
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Empathy is definitely a learned trait that develops slowly. Children generally start off treating life as if it has a preset plot and other people as sort of NPCs or characters in their life. Realising other people and even animals experience things at all should happen at some point. And realising their experiences are different again later. But it’s a complicated process and may even fail.

          https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/smart-parenting-smarter-kids/201905/how-children-develop-empathy looked pretty good from a quick search. Otherwise that’s just my memory from basic psychology classes.

          • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Thanks for the response. I guess some people still think everybody else is an NPC into later life lol.

            I’ll have a read of that link over the weekend so thanks for sharing.

        • sparkle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          depends on your genetics and the environment of the womb, brains are pretty complicated and behaviour is affected a lot by that kind of stuff. there exist people who mostly or entirely lack empathy after being born and there are people who are ultraempathetic, and there’s a ton in between.

          there’s also a difference between “cognitive empathy” (the ability to recognize others’ emotions) and “affective empathy” (how you emotionally respond to your perception of others’ emotions). something also associated with empathy is the ability to distinguish between yourself and others, i.e. how well you can put yourself in their shoes rather than think of their experience from your own perspective.

          a lot of people suck at the last one, which is bad because even if you have positive affective empathy and can share others’ emotions, you still may not be able to really grasp how they feel and you’ll probably think that they’re overreacting or underreacting or reacting wrong because you can’t imagine yourself acting the same way if you experienced the same thing. many people are subconsciously sexist or racist because they see someone dealing with casual sexism and racism and think it’s not that bad, just brush it off, but they can’t relate at all because they don’t have the same set of life experiences and same psychology as other people. to them it’s “i wouldn’t react that way if someone did that to me, so you shouldn’t either”.

          it’s usual for humans to have enough empathy to survive as a pack/society at least, but it’s also usual for humans to not have a mood disorder and it’s usual for humans to have 5 toes on each foot. in some “societies” like american capitalism, less affective empathy is usually advantageous with high cognitive empathy, and more affective empathy is usually a disadvantage, which is kind of the opposite trend in humans.

          a lot of the times when it seems someone lacks empathy, they either don’t express their empathy in typical ways, or conditions (like culture) require them to silence it to be successful. but they could also just lack affective empathy, or have dissonant empathy (affective empathy entailing an opposite emotional response than what you would expect), both of which are typical anti-social and narcissistic traits.

          • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Thank you for all this, it’s been very informative.

            It does raise a few more questions, but it’s cool if you don’t have time to answer.

            What kind of empathy would it be when one cries at films due to the story. Whether it be something bad happening to somebody or even tears of joy for their success.

            How does one know if there empathy for someone else is from your own perspective vs trying to see it from someone else’s?

            Like if I’ve never been homeless but i wholeheartedly can understand and see how one might end up there though choices, or even no fault of their own.

    • Techognito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The fact that there could be someone out there thinking, “I have 17 homes, so clearly they are imagining not having a home”, does not shock me

      edit: grammar and my brains is a mix of spaghetti and mashed potatoes

      • Eranziel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s more like, “I own 17 homes and it wasn’t that hard to get that many. They must not be trying hard enough.”

    • bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is funny when it comes to minority groups in a larger one.

      I remember telling someone passionate about his org that I’ve seen some homophobia/queerphobia and shit in the org, and he was like “Homophobia here??? We don’t tolerate that, it can’t be happening. I haven’t seen it”

      Well, it’s not like they are calling you a f****t or some shit, you aint queer

    • macrocarpa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      being perennially excluded from parents group, kids activities, volunteering, coaching and other social connective activities because you’re a male parent and might accidentally sexually assault someone

      losing multiple male friends to suicide, and seeing society handwave it away as being less important than any other form of death, despite its incidence being 10 times that of homicide

      being objectified as inherently dangerous, simply for having a penis, and worse still understanding why

      starting each day trying to be good, and do good, and that still never, ever being enough

      Why participate?

      • Devorlon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That stuff sucks, and to add to your first point, I love hanging out with kids. They view the world in an interesting way that usually leads to funny out of context quotes about their parents.

        But would I go up to even an acquaintances kid to talk? No. Since I’m a 199cm (🇲🇲6’6🇱🇷) hunk of man meat, I’d probably scare the kid and parent half to death.

        The same goes for anyone, not just women. I don’t have the right to make anyone feel unsafe and if I am, then it’s my duty to walk away.

        It’s not my fault, or yours. It’s just the way of things, and the only way we can fix it, is to respect everyone’s feelings. Unless they’re minimising your loss of someone, in which case fuck them.

        • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          why should anyone be thought of as scary by other simply because of how they were born, people shouldnt look at someone and assume they are gonna start killing people just because they are big or a man, that is wrong it is wrong to think that way and the people who do should change.

          I mean the idea that if people perceive u as dangerous for no good reason they should act as if u were dangerous and thats just something u have to deal with is ridiculous, in any other context this line of reasoning would be considered obviously wrong if a white person acted as tho all black people were dangerous they would be rightly called racists and be expected to change their behavior so why should it be any different with men, why is it suddenly ok good even to uphold the patriarchy against men, this is ridiculous if people feel afraid of u for no reason u should challenge them on it and question it not just accept it as if it were normal.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s super ironic that you are the top comment in THIS thread.

      Hi again, you assumed that I thought deep fakes worked off magicly making nudes and just didn’t understand the technology of aggregation as opposed to listening to the ways that women are being blackmailed and harassed by it. And that even if deepfake is exponentially faster and more accessible, it’s nothing new or different than drawing a picture of someone naked, even in the age of social media

      Instead of actually listening you were arrogant, dismissive and hostile. You are the man in this comic. You are the person who is not harmed by deep fakes, so it’s not a real problem.

      • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s been a while so idk if you remember, but as soon as I realized what you meant I immediately owned up to my mistake. This was from one of the last comments I made to you back then:

        I’m not trying to be disingenuous, it genuinely sounded like you didn’t realize, that’s my bad.

        I thought you meant something that you didn’t. The second I realized, I admitted that I was at fault. I fucked up there, and I’m sorry for that.

        • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          And the very next thing you said was…

          Imo as these become widespread, we’ll inevitably reach a point where nudes simply don’t matter. If anyone can create a nude of someone else with next to no effort in seconds, then a nude getting “leaked” would have next to no impact or relevance.

          So yes, you apologized for assuming I didn’t understand what I was talking about, but you then double down ignoring the harassment I was bringing up. I’m not interested in discussing any part of this with you, we already have gone round and round. I was just shocked, amazed to read you today and had to highlight your lack of self awareness in saying

          “I’ve never experienced it so you must just be imagining it”

          Harassment of women with deepfakes has no impact or relevance, because hostility to women only has no impact or relevance to you.

          • CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I’m… a little confused. That comment of mine has nothing to do with my comment above or the post.

            The post is about people’s ignorance, and their refusal to accept that there may be anything outside of their limited perspective.

            I never said that your point wasn’t valid, or was made up. I simply didn’t agree with it, and had my own opinion. My last comment to you back then literally talked about the fact that I feel terrible for those negatively impacted by this, acknowledging that it’s a real thing that affects real people.

            Someone acknowledging yet disagreeing with you isn’t the same at what’s in this post, and imo does it a massive disservice, as its about a lot more than that.

            Here’s my comment for clarity:

            Right now we live in a pretty puritan society, so the transitional phase is going to suck and people are going to be hurt. Obviously that’s awful, and none of this should take away from that fact, I feel horrible for the people negatively impacted by this.

            And while that’s all true, it’s also true that as we continue going down this road we’ll reach a point where it simply won’t matter anymore.

            The first part clearly addresses and acknowledges reality. I’m in no way dismissing it, pretending it doesn’t exist, or saying that “because I don’t experience it it isn’t real”. I fully acknowledge that it’s real and is a serious issue.

            The second part is my own opinion in addition to it. It doesn’t take away from the first part, this isn’t a zero sum game, both can be true. I have my own opinion while fully acknowledging your own and seeing the validity of it.

  • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    Weird, this pulled more down votes than a lot of the posts around it.

    I wonder why.

        • classic@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          Besides being inane, it was their ubiquity on reddit that drove me to dislike them

          • Encamped@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not to mention, it drove me mad how her comics devolved from sorta eh relatable stuff, to just complaining about hate and sexism and how terrible her fate is. If it’s really so bad that she can’t resist making half her comics about it, maybe she should take a break instead of going on this “everyone’s sexist, everyone hates me, they are all awful people” spiral. It was especially annoying how she ended up responding to legit constructive criticism the same way as the genuinely awful sexist shit, but I digress.

    • Amanduh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      42
      ·
      7 months ago

      I never go searching out pizza cake, but when i see it I will always downvote it.

        • CptEnder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Lol yeah me too. They’re no Wars and Peas but they’re pretty funny.

          My conspiracy theory is people liked her until the OnlyFans then the incels came out because “sure wasn’t in her lane”. I say get that grip girl.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Reporter: [REDACTED]
    Reason: it’s pizzacake

    Some people don’t know how to click downvote and move on with their day,
    or make a comment,
    or unsubscribe,
    or make their own c/ComicsExceptPizzaCake community.

    Some people have to talk to the manager and waste my time.

      • MY_ANUS_IS_BLEEDING@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        To summarise the discourse:

        • The artist makes boring unfunny comics and posts them to Reddit.

        • The comics always seem to have tons of upvotes, every time.

        • People question why they are allegedly so popular when they are boring and accuse her of buying upvotes.

        • Artist then responds with misandrist drama comics about how all these evil men are out to get her.

        • Everything becomes toxic as incels come out of the woodwork to attack her and feminists defend her comics in response.

        • Everyone is too busy with their upvote/downvote wars to remember that the comics are actually garbage.

        • mamotromico@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Damm, I didn’t know there were people with such a hateboner for pizzacake. Her stuff is not top shelf comedy but they tend to give me a chuckle consistently.

          • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Completely agree. The normal silly comics are usually somewhat amusing. Can’t say I like her more misandry ones, but they tend to be responses to actual assholes, so I just ignore them and move on when I see them.

              • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                To be fair, I’ve also seen a significant number of cases where a guy venting that a woman was shitty to him has been deemed misogyny unless he makes an explicit effort to make it clear he’s only talking about those specific women and it does not generalize to any woman not specifically mentioned.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          > Posts generic comic
          > Comments are abusive
          > Makes comic about abusive comments
          > Abusers claim comic is abusive toward them

          Uh huh.

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    I legitimately don’t understand how a man can be blind to this kind of treatment of women. Don’t you just need to look at any treatment of women online for more than a nanosecond and you’ll see this?

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      My hypothesis is it’s two major parts:

      1. Protect one’s ego at all costs. Anything that makes you feel bad, at all, is to be rejected.
      2. Join in-groups that do not value or respect women.

      For most people, belief is more social than we’d like to admit. So if your in-groups are a bunch of jerks who think women “talk too much” or whatever, you’ll probably adopt that. It’ll be continually reinforced from your socializing. Then with point #1, any time contrary evidence that does manage to break through you’ll reject it rather than doing any hard work or introspection.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Can you explain point 1 more? How do negative experiences online for women damage men’s egos?

        • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I am by no means an expert on this.

          But just spitballing, let’s imagine the victim (often but not always a woman) says something generalized like “Men are assholes online.” The man hears this, and since they are a man, and since men were just called assholes, they feel like they were called an asshole. That hurts the sense of self, the ego, to accept.

          I think it’s the group identity thing, really? Like, the group they’re a part of was insulted, so they feel personally insulted. Accepting that the group isn’t great is hard for the brain. They don’t want to be part of a group that’s bad (men online) because that hurts their sense of self, the ego.

          I’m a guy, but I don’t, like, care. Not in a gender-queer or trans way, but it’s just not a big deal to me. Maybe that’s why if someone’s like “Men are trash” I can just shrug. But if someone was like “People in New York City are pretentious, rude, assholes” I’d probably have an emotional response. But patriarchy is a much bigger and more wide spread issue, so it’s not really the same.

          • jsomae@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            That makes sense. Perhaps sweeping generalisations should be avoided out of concern such a response could be triggered. FWIW, there are loads of sweeping generalisations about women too. Even the ones that look innocuous bother me.

            • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Maybe! I meant to write in my previous one but forgot: often when the person is making the sweeping generalization in this kind of context, they’re upset. They’re annoyed. They’re not going to be their most kind, patient, self. You probably wouldn’t be if some strangers just told you they were going to [threats and insults].

              So while it’s in a sense true that we should avoid broad generalizations, I think it’s fair to cut someone slack in this kind of context. They are probably not looking to be nitpicked.

              Think about times you’re annoyed. Like, let’s say FedEx just delivered you a smashed package for the third time in a row. You go “FedEx sucks they always ruin my packages”. You probably don’t need or want someone to go “actually, them deliver more than 99% of packages with no problems. Maybe you should [unsolicited advice]”. It doesn’t matter if that’s true. That’s not what you’re looking for in that moment.

              All of that aside, yeah, we should be mindful of speaking in absolutes.

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Selfishness, ignorance, lack of empathy, inability to see more than one perspective, misogyny, the “Well, I’m alright, Jack.” mentality, and the ability to ignore all the evidence in order to maintain my own personal view are just some of the tactics I’m employing right now to openly disbelieve what you tell me is your own personal lived experience. Glad I could mansplain explain that for you. s/

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I suppose some men are just so used to their own toxicity that they just look down on anyone who “can’t take it”. Women suffer even more because they are more easily targeted and “will never be as tough”

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      my theory is that it’s just sort of universal across the internet. You have a wrong think in a group, and that group will delete you forever.

      I think there’s a more specific version of this that ends up targeting women directly though.

      We see it all the time with internet justice, someone posts rage bait, fake or real, people doxx them, people harm them, whatever. Shit like this just kind of happens. I think.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why? You should teach the same things to your son at the least for empathy , the most for prevension.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    one thing i’ve noticed, is that when you get into less moderated, harder to moderate, and less centralized services, particularly anti-censorship ones, you get a lot of shitty people congregating there. And the reason why is pretty simple, it’s because you can. Some of it is probably just edgy shitposting, because, internet. Some of it is also just genuine, because again, the internet.

    So you get this weird thing where it fractures heavily, into to small communal groups, that each do their own thing. But you have a broad group of outliers, who generally exist outside of this space also, which means that it tends to be rather hit and miss what you find.

    This is one of the reasons i really like the darknet conceptually. Yes there may be racism there, but you know what else isn’t there? Rules, and you know what that means? People can make their own however they please. Don’t like it? Go away, simple as that.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      r/TalesFromYourServer: Kicking a Nazi out as soon as they walk in

      I was at a shitty crustpunk bar once getting an after-work beer. One of those shitholes where the bartenders clearly hate you. So the bartender and I were ignoring one another when someone sits next to me and he immediately says, “no. get out.”

      And the dude next to me says, “hey i’m not doing anything, i’m a paying customer.” and the bartender reaches under the counter for a bat or something and says, “out. now.” and the dude leaves, kind of yelling. And he was dressed in a punk uniform, I noticed

      Anyway, I asked what that was about and the bartender was like, “you didn’t see his vest but it was all nazi shit. Iron crosses and stuff. You get to recognize them.”

      And i was like, ohok and he continues.

      "you have to nip it in the bud immediately. These guys come in and it’s always a nice, polite one. And you serve them because you don’t want to cause a scene. And then they become a regular and after awhile they bring a friend. And that dude is cool too.

      And then THEY bring friends and the friends bring friends and they stop being cool and then you realize, oh shit, this is a Nazi bar now. And it’s too late because they’re entrenched and if you try to kick them out, they cause a PROBLEM. So you have to shut them down.

      And i was like, ‘oh damn.’ and he said “yeah, you have to ignore their reasonable arguments because their end goal is to be terrible, awful people.”

      And then he went back to ignoring me. But I haven’t forgotten that at all.

    • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The biggest mistake new moderators make is allowing bad actors to use the rules against them. You can’t be too prescriptive, you can’t give them ammo to go “well this doesn’t technically violate any rule.” And when they complain you have a “don’t disrupt the community” rule and say it’s “too vague” just tag them as potentially a problem and see what they do. In my experience, they inevitably deserve a ban.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is my experience moderating communities as well. The worst trolls get a kick out of testing how far they can stretch the rules and provoke mayhem without getting banned. Excessively explicit rules also trample over people who would usually cause no trouble, but get too tense under exceptional situations.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I have zero thoughts or comments on this specific comic, but can we please leave pizzacake on reddit? They were already plenty inescapable enough there.

      • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        are other justifications needed? seeing the same shit in the same in the same style all the time gets boring regardless of any other factor.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          When the response is ‘mods should ban this artist’s work,’ absofuckinglutely more justification is needed. Kneejerk hatred for something popular is childish. Whining about it to others is performative sneering. Expecting authority to enforce a shallow contrarian opinion is just plain shitty.

          Underlined in bold when half the complaints go ‘We’re not like that! Fuck this bitch!’

          • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            true but wanting people to stop posting something and asking the mods to ban it are different things, if that is what u got from the original comment that is an extremely… extreme reading of it. If that is the context u had in mind for ur comment i dont disagree but imma be honest i think u misread it.

          • Vespair@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I never asked for mods to ban pizzacake, I asked the potential audience to practice a little bit of discernment in their tastes.

            I think this is an important distinction, personally.

      • MY_ANUS_IS_BLEEDING@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        They’re boring and lame, and they have a cultish following of people who defend them not because they are actually good, but because the artist receives abuse.

        This comic is a prime example of it. Completely unfunny, unoriginal, strawman argument that achieves nothing more than making people argue with each other.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The only arguing here is your cult of haters. Making the comic not a strawman. It’s about you.

          The answer to the question was evidently “no.”

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        My issue with pizzacake is her wildly sycophantic fans and their disingenuous bad behavior.

        So as much as I may not be a fan of pizzacake, yeah I agree she obviously isn’t as awful or problematic as a literal Nazi and thus doesn’t deserve to be maligned the same way as pebbleshit does.

        I don’t want to see this place turn into another worship space for pizzacake, but I also don’t believe that she personally deserves any ire or overt negativity as a person

  • daltotron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think it’s just one of those like, hostile to anything not seen as “default” kinda things, right? there are two sexes, male, and political, two races, white, and political, two orientations, straight and political, kinda deal.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      i don’t know how much i follow this tbh.

      I think that’s probably the case for some people in some communities. More broadly? i doubt it though, i think.

      Like i’ve followed linux communities semi regularly, and every so often you’ll get mentions of queer posting in the comments, and you’ll get queerphobic shit in response, which given that the linux community is mostly older people, who are nerds, that generally tracks with what you expect, but there are also always people who just aren’t pieces of shit also, so idk how much of it is demographic concat, or something else entirely.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Neither side in this sex war seems willing to admit that both parties are deeply behaviorally flawed in terms of operating within an (at least in rhetoric) equitable society we all claim to want with one another.

    I think step zero would be for both men and women to admit that both are deeply flawed in their engagement with one another, acknowledge both are trying to operate within sociocultural environments we are evolutionarily unprepared for, and therefore shouldn’t expect perfection or even competency from the other, so we can work to bridge the massive empathy deficit between us.

    But since healing doesn’t trend on social media or in culture like vitriol, insult, or indignation, carry on.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Please understand that a subset of your group is a serious threat to our safety”

      briefcase unclasping noise

      “Sure but step one is to define what the term safe really means in this context…”

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        i would like to request a case study from the psych department, where we make another post once this has all blown over that just says “rape bad, don’t rape women MMmkay?” or something like that so we can see how the responses differ.

        i’m not shitposting i just think we should do this.

    • vulpix@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Kinda hard to have an equal discussion when being a woman entails being sexually harassed and occasionally assaulted by a bunch of men, mostly ones you barely know or don’t know at all, on a regular basis before you even hit puberty. Your “sex war” is more like a sex genocide with the effects biting the whole male demographic in the ass, even the ones who didn’t cause it.

      It’s also hard when most of the men that participate in this discussion (despite often not wanting to admit it at first) subconsciously think that women should listen to their venting 5 seconds after meeting them and be in a relationship with them and hug them and bang them and stuff. Seriously, interacting with guys just feels like gambling, with most of them forming some sort of unhealthy obsession with you and taking your kindness as a sign of weakness or inability to see their red flags; to a lot of guys, interaction with them is basically a green light to move on you. It sometimes feels like life is a “don’t unintentionally upset or engage with a random man too much or else he might find your phone number on the dark web and send you texts threatening to rape, torture, and murder you”. We live in a society where it’s relatively common for high school girls to have a guy classmate they occasionally talk to tell/text them that they wanna rape her, just unfiltered and out there because she decided to have a conversation.

      Their problems are caused by patriarchy too, but that doesn’t mean I’m willing to subject myself to sexism from them. They, whether they realize it or not, feel like they deserve what they want from a woman, the unfairness of women not wanting them makes them frustrated and they see gender equality as a means to an end, they see it as a way to have women finally love them.

      It’s not so much of “women and men are equally fucking up and need to make up” as it is “women are extremely scared by men, and negotiating with the likely emotionally unstable potentially violent people with nothing to lose who probably thought about you and them dating immediately after seeing you never seems like the good option”. It’s like encouraging kids to interact with people who they think are violent and might shoot up a school in order to convince them not to shoot up the school… Even talking to someone out of pity is endangering yourself.

      Most guys want to get in your pants or eventually get to that point, whether you’re apathetic to them or nice to them or mean to them. How am I supposed to talk to guys about sexism when usually their main concern is the lack of action with women and my main concern is interacting with men is inherently extremely risky and I fear I’m about to get raped or murdered when a man raises his voice at me?

      It has to be at least 95% of straight men who are the danger women have to do conversational twister with to be relatively safe and comfortable around, and the remaining portion of men usually take an “insult” about the majority of men as an “insult” to them.

      Men and women are both negatively affected by our sexist system but the playing field is not level. The solution is getting a majority of men to realize exactly what women deal with from men, and getting them to actively work against their subconscious sexism to promote a safer environment for women and remove the high risk of interacting with men, including by halting the rampant objectification of women and their bodies, so women and men can actually be humans with each other for real. The widespread outrage things like the bear meme gets show that this probably isn’t going to work out any time soon. Men usually immediately think of it as a challenge to “prove” that women are worse by saying a lot of them are bitchy and hard to read and gold diggers or something, rather than a way to understand why women can’t feel safe around men the same way they can around women. But instead men think of it as how women feel about any single man, including them.

      At least there are communities like !mensliberation@lemmy.ca that are on the right path though. Sigh.

        • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago
          *Kinda hard to have an equal discussion when being a woman entails being sexually harassed and occasionally assaulted by a bunch of men, mostly ones you barely know or don’t know at all, on a regular basis before you even hit puberty.*
          

          genuine question, how do you expect it to get any better if you aren’t being civil?

          The decision matrix here isn’t [civil engagement ||or|| uncivil engagement], but rather:

          [civil engagement and incur non-zero risk of uncivil retaliation ||or|| do not engage]

          Non-participation is the safer option, broadly speaking. If your speaking with a stranger, it’s better to let a minor slight slide, than to engage civilly. As you get to know someone better, as you become more familiar with conditions, this chart becomes a secondary consideration or even unnecessary. But with strangers, you never know if you’re dealing with an outlier.

    • stormesp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Lol, you must be one of the guys that get offended by this or the bear meme. If you think stuff like this attacks all men or you directly, or that women have done wrong to men even 1% of what sexism and men violence has done to them you just need to close lemmy for an hour and read a bit. And im a man in case you were wondering, i just dont have my head inside my own ass.

      Edit: just to make it clear to everyone reading this guy post where he talked about both sides and all that shit https://lemm.ee/comment/11953665 ended up just saying that for them womens problems are imaginary because they have a full belly and a roof. The story is always the same it doesnt take much to show when someone is such a level of sexist even when they are trying to hide it behind bullshit rethorics.

        • stormesp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          7 months ago

          i will, maybe you will too when you understand there is no sex wars and its just 50% of the population just wanting to feel safe.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            i think you might… etymologically, be able to uh classify that statement as a “sex war”

            like i get what we’re saying but there also kind of is, isn’t there?

          • Allonzee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I hope you have a happy Wednesday regardless of your strongly held beliefs, unless one of them is wanting to have bad/unhappy Wednesdays, in which case I apologize for my transgression.

            • stormesp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              7 months ago

              Oh my, the strongly held beliefs that everyone should be equal and feel safe around other people.

                • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  It certainly is remarkable that every time someone who Totally Isn’t Sexist and is Just Trying To Be Reasonable is on the topic of sexism, it will never take them long to go for ‘well other people are suffering more so sexism comparatively isn’t a real problem’.

                  PS: whatever role you think I have in “gender wars” you’re probably wrong.

                • stormesp@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Sure, im all in for that, it is part of being communist you know? But at the same time that doesnt mean i treat the problems inherent to being a woman in our society as minor problems. ;) Or are you saying that because there is homeless people and police harassment we should leave racism, sexism and other problems undiscussed? hmmmm, seems to me like you are trying to say that a big part of the earths population doesnt have the right to fight for a better life because there is people in worse conditions.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      i’ve been saying this the entire time, and weirdly, people seem to like it, or at the very least, stop commenting to my responses because they simply don’t want to engage because productive dialogue bad? Or something, idk it’s the internet don’t ask me, i’m not real.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      amen.

      but that would require taking sex out of the equation. sex is what drives all of this misery on both sides. it’s much easier to empathize with people you don’t want to fuck, rather than seeing them as a in terms of sexual social dynamics, where those who are sexual desirable on both sides are given leeway in behaviour that is intolerable for those who are not sexual desirable.

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I would absolutely agree with you, except for all the other lines humans are always eager to draw between ourselves to the point of undermining our own brothers and sisters. Race, religion, political affiliation, economic opinions, holy shit the lines we draw for socioeconomic status, these aren’t random divisions, we seek them out and make bright red angry lines, it is in our nature to draw lines in the sand between ourselves, a remnant of when there literally wasn’t enough to go around and only some survived a harsh winter.

        To me, again, the first step would for us all to recognize this divisive nature within ourselves and acknowledge its existence to begin mitigating its detrimental effects using societal tools and culture eyes open. Same goes for greed, same goes for hate, our impulse to divide ourselves is destructive, our only hope is to acknowledge its there, it’s a near universal problem WE need to minimize.

        We can’t though because we prefer to play pretend we are above our deeply ingrained animalistic programming, and would consider it insult to acknowledge those vestigial dark impulses are still part of us. But we need to, not to shame us, not to rationalize the cruelty that comes from them, but to add those variables into the equation of civilization so we can solve for homeostasis/relative happiness ans harmony. Denial/Repression is never the answer to anything. It makes things worse.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think this is a great place to ask this: What would be the problem, if we would ignore gender in all laws?

    This should be a thought experiment, I don’t intend to attack anybody

    • sparkle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The “colorblind” approach doesn’t really work. it only serves to maintain social hierarchies by ignoring that there’s a problem in the first place.

      By basically not having the laws which are there to promote solving the problem, it effectively ignores that there’s a problem at all. Being officially legally the same doesn’t mean society treats you the same, and at that point you’re trusting the population to just dissolve the hierarchies themselves with the law disallowing the methods which are actually effective at doing that which… doesn’t work.

      Plus there’s a ton of ways to discriminate in law without mentioning gender, and having plausible deniability about it. That’s what a ton of the Jim Crow era in the US was about. That’s what much existing legislation does with women actually.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I was more thinking about legacy laws that are clearly still based on gender roles

  • heavy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If you read this comic and the first thing you’re concerned* about is how men feel, you’re part of the problem.

    • linkhidalgogato@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      so true men dont have feelings there is no reason to care about what they think or how they feel or how things affect them. Empathy is wasted on men, not that u had any of that anyways.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I am baffled by how humanity has managed to survive this long when so many men suck so fucking much. Then, when I think of it further, large portions of it was probably due to the women having no fucking choice, exemplifying one of many important ways in which men suck.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      What about if I read it and thought, well online communities are hostile towards everybody?

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        They aren’t hostile in the same degree towards all groups. Sure, you may have people mock you on a voice chat after you get killed in a game, but the chances are nothing alike those of the harassment you will get for having a female voice.