Lets say contentious things about Star Trek! I’ll start!

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The mirror universe sucks. It adds nothing to the franchise, and the episodes that involve it are some of the worst in every series

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      100% agreed. They should have forgotten about it after the one TOS episode. I like that episode a lot though.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Honestly? Queer representation by characters in a universe where everyone is evil is, in some ways, a step backward.

          • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            8 months ago

            That shit’s on Berman. Mirror Kira was such a fun character, allowing Nana to chew up the scenery.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Mirror Kira was fun in that sense, but honestly, I don’t feel like the mirror universe stories added much to DS9 and there are other ways she can show her range.

              • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                8 months ago

                Her episode where she’s supposed to evict a farmer from his land is one of the best examples of both Kira as a character and Nana’s ability as an actor.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I agree that she definitely had opportunities to show range in the character of Kira, but I was thinking of the many ‘alternate version of X character’ Star Trek plots that don’t involve the mirror universe they could have gone with if the goal was ‘this actor plays a totally different character.’ DS9 itself even did that, like with the Benny Russell episodes.

          • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Big agree. I also want the option of having evil, edgy queers who aren’t from the mirror universe, but that would only make sense against a backdrop of more representation in general

  • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 months ago

    Strange New Worlds has painted itself somewhat into a corner by being a prequel.

    It’s a great series, but if Spock and Uhura are in trouble, and the only way to save them is for that nice James Kirk fella to sacrifice himself, well, we know that there’s a twist coming.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is always going to be the problem with series set before canon events and it’s long been an issue I had with them. I know it’s easier to write historical fiction in an established universe and you can dodge some of this by going back far enough (see: ENT); but, it is always going to feel hesitant and a bit uninspired.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      My bigger issue with SNW Uhura is it’s taking way too long to become the super confident TOS Uhura.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    Making Sisko the Emissary added a lot of bad habits to Star Trek that went against a lot of the ideals of early Trek. Kirk and Picard were both supposed to be competent humans, but only that far. Sisko led to writers creating those whose paths were dictated by fate, like Archer and Pike.

    • Dieterlan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t know anything about Archer (what was his destiny thing?), but I like what they’ve done with Pike. His knowing how he’s going to die (more or less) doesn’t change his competency as a captain, imo, just gives him some pretty good personal issues to grapple with, in a pretty Trekkie way.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I tend to agree.

      But I have always enjoyed the dual destiny - that time is irrelevant to the wormhole aliens, so Sisko is only destined to become the Emissary because of normal practical human choices that he was going to make anyway.

      It’s fun to watch him wrestle with the way he was raised resulting in his actions turning into a kind of pillar of faith for an alien race.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      I loved Neelix, especially when it was revealed that pretty much all of his bowing and scraping and his jealousy could be explained by having extreme PTSD after seeing almost his entire species get wiped out, but it was always clear to me that Ethan Phillips played Neelix with a lot of sadness hidden behind his behavior.

      After Kes left, he was also a much better character.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I actually love the character, and Ethan’s portrayal.

        I’m really just being spicy.

        That said, only one half of Tuvix was capable of operating Trek’s famous science-magic-saves-the-ship interface(s).

  • Destroyer of Worlds 3000@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Neelix and Kesssssss should have been shot out of a torpedo tube while still conscious before the end of Season 1.

    Star Treck Disco was, is, and will always be a hot mess of spare parts boldly going nowhere.

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Kes was a gross character whose entire appeal was fetishizing youth. Neelix and Kes was an even grosser relationship.

      • oleorun@real.lemmy.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Kes having feelings for The Doctor put an end to any hope I had for her character.

        When they brought Kes back later as the…dementia demon? Idk what to call that but it drove extra nails into the coffin. Using that episode to send Voyager that much closer to the Alpha Quadrant was the icing on the coffin.

  • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Pretty sure that’s been established as the concensus by now.

    My contribution is that Harry Kim deserved to stay an ensign. Considering how often his impulse or libido resulted in disaster (or his own death), he would have been kicked out of Starfleet entirely. Lucky for him, they were stranded in the Delta Quadrant and Janeway needed bodies.

      • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        The ship in distress he decided to help. Turns out they were smuggling a cloak prototype to defend against a warring faction. Look at our little Ensign Kim, breaking the Prime Directive for the first time. They grow up so quick.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I literally just watched that one last week, and had zero memory of it. I don’t think that’s happened w any other voyager ep for me

    • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think Harry picks up too many strays. If Voyager wasn’t in the Delta quadrant, he would have gotten happily promoted up to Lt. Commander of some Miranda or California and retired as a mildly interesting officer who never did anything of note (or gets got in the cold open of some other more interesting ship’s episode). In fact, that so many randos who just happened to be on Voyager can hang with the level of bullshit that ship got up to would be a statistical anomaly if it wasn’t 100% certain that some Future Janeway stacked the deck during assignments for that mission to the badlands.

  • darthelmet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    I didn’t actually have a problem with the way Enterprise ended. Setting aside the actual quality of the episode, I think the framing device connecting the beginning and ending of this era of Star Trek was fitting given that this was the end of Star Trek for the foreseeable future.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah. The ending was foreshadowed plenty. The part that hurts is we got 45 minutes instead of the full season that they clearly planned on.

      • darthelmet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh yeah. I guess it’s kind of a shame that we didn’t get to see a longer story for the founding of the Federation.

  • TotallyNotSpez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    My 2nd hot take in this comment section: I actually enjoy Star Trek V - The Final Frontier an awful lot. Roasting Marshmelons, singing Row Row Row Your Boat, being one with the horse, killing “God”… What’s not to like?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      What’s not to like?

      “I know this ship like the back of my hand.” bonk

  • _NetNomad@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    i never got where people thinking burnham is a mary sue comes from. the whole concept of her character is that she’s a cowboy loose cannon without the competence to back it up. it’s specifically a subversion of every time our hero breaks the rules and steals The Ship and it ends up being ok because they saved the day or stopped the big war or whatever. the series starts with her trying to do just that, bringing about what she wanted to prevent, and getting arrested for it!

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    If time travel is said to be impossible yet it is so easily achieved in so many story lines in Star Trek than why didn’t they just invent a safe way to travel between periods.

    And if there is an eventual temporal war than everything gets destroyed and all life is wiped out in the galaxy. There would have eventually been an extremist group that would have taken the technology to it’s fullest limits and traveled back to a period when the galaxy was very young. They would have severely altered everything to the point of not making any future possible.

    It always annoyed me that engineers, scientists and technicians could always find a way to travel back and forth through time “just this once because of this reason” … yet no one takes up the science to recreate the event and bake technology to purposely travel back and forth through time.

    • OsaErisXero@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think the shows have actually fielded this issue rather well. Temporal investigations was the start, then the timecops in Voyager and SNW. The Trek timeline is in a constant state of flux to the point that the TOS bridge and the SNW bridge are supposed to be the same place, and the fact that time travel is so easy is a great explanation for how everything in the ‘past’ and future keeps changing on the whims of producers at Paramount.

    • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      How else do you explain Temporal Anomalies steering clear of Janeway (future/present/whenever) getting away with whatever? With exception to that incident with Sarah Silverman.

        • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well, you had me until Nietzsche. If only for the association of his rhetoric with the slog that was “The Brothers Karamazov” by Dostoyevsky. As to the ongoing debate relating to each person’s influence may not be proven, I find it hard not to disassociate such a blathering tale with their mutual misguided ideals.

  • zellian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    TNG is pretty meh. I grew up with it, I’ve watched every episode at least twice, but now that I’m as old as Patrick Steward was when TNG started, I have a hard time caring about most episodes.