• DeadPand@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    But I thought fascism was only going to happen if Trump is elected? Guess it’s already here, now what do we do??

    • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      I know!

      let’s not vote and get trump elected so that instead of just being arrested, these people are shipped off to a gulag.

      That will fix everything!

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      61
      ·
      8 months ago

      This isn’t fascism. These people will get a slap on the wrist and be sent home in a day or two. Under fascism these people would never be heard from again.

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        So punishing free speech and protest is not fascist provided that they are “only” in jail for a couple of days? Seriously?

        Obviously cracking down on protests doesn’t mean it’s 1930s Germany but it’s part of the same playbook, surely?

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m certainly not defending the silencing of protest. It’s just that all fascism is authoritarian, but not all authoritarianism is fascist. Fascism has a specific definition and it’s a whole other degree of bad.

          • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Fair enough. It is being used more colloquially in this case, you’re right. I retract the accusation of fascism and substitute “an unjust authoritarian crackdown on the right to freedom of speech and expression, undermining the very tenets of democratic society. A national embarrassment.”

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            would you be able to link to a page that helps describe fascism as you say: that relies on severity of consequence?

            asking because whilst i agree that fascism is specific - and this doesn’t cover it - im not sure that degree of severity is part of the definition and that could be a dangerous precedent to set because the other parts of fascism about control and quashing dissent enable the severe consequences once they are present

              • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                really appreciate you taking the effort! i see where you’re coming from with the “enemies of the state” part, and think that id agree there

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It was at a private college campus and the dean suspended all the students protesting and requested to have NYPD come remove them. In other words, the property caretaker was being a dick and had them removed from the premises.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is fascism-lite. Just because people aren’t disappeared doesn’t mean it’s not in the same category. And the only way we can hope to stop from getting to “actual” fascism is by resisting shit like this.

        • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Exactly.

          Fascism doesn’t come in detended stages, it’s tiny increments where the state seizes more power and restricts rights gradually until suddenly you notice that people are disappearing and everyones primary emotion is fear

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t disagree that silencing protest is bad. It’s just not fascism. Fascists kill dissenters.

          Treating protestors like this is the norm (though it always must be fought). It’s how they were treated during Occupy Wall Street. It’s how they were treated during Vietnam and the civil rights fight. Authoritarianism can come from both the left and the right. Fascism is always from the right.

          • rammer
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Fascists kill dissenters.

            Not in the beginning. In the beginning it’s more about the economic side of fascism. And that has definitely happened in the US. For decades now.