Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agoSarah Silverman and other authors are suing OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement, alleging that they're training their LLMs on books via Library Genesis and Z-Librarywww.thedailybeast.comexternal-linkmessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down11cross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.mlchatgpt@lemdro.id
arrow-up1195arrow-down1external-linkSarah Silverman and other authors are suing OpenAI and Meta for copyright infringement, alleging that they're training their LLMs on books via Library Genesis and Z-Librarywww.thedailybeast.comArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square130fedilinkcross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.mlchatgpt@lemdro.id
minus-squareSpaceToast@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 year agoThis is why I am pro AI art. It’s no different than a human taking inspiration from other work. Nobody comes up with anything truly original. It’s all inspired by someone before them.
minus-squareAndrewZabar@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·1 year agoI don’t know how anyone is pro AI anything other than the pigs making money from it. Only bad can result of it. And will.
minus-squareSpaceToast@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 year agoI don’t know how anyone can be anti AI. It’s just a tool. To say that only bad can result of it is a bold claim that doesn’t make any sense. Can you provide an example?
minus-squareAndrewZabar@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoJust wait and see.
minus-squareDouble_A@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoOnly bad can result from it, just because some company is making profits?
minus-squareAndrewZabar@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoNo, that wasn’t a correlation. Only bad can result from it. Also, companies making profit love it. Separate things.
minus-squareSinJab0n@mujico.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoI’m not anti AI, I’m against companies making profit out of other peoples work without paying them.
minus-squarePipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoHere is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/X9RYuvPCQUA Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
This is why I am pro AI art. It’s no different than a human taking inspiration from other work.
Nobody comes up with anything truly original. It’s all inspired by someone before them.
I don’t know how anyone is pro AI anything other than the pigs making money from it. Only bad can result of it. And will.
I don’t know how anyone can be anti AI.
It’s just a tool. To say that only bad can result of it is a bold claim that doesn’t make any sense.
Can you provide an example?
Just wait and see.
Only bad can result from it, just because some company is making profits?
No, that wasn’t a correlation. Only bad can result from it. Also, companies making profit love it. Separate things.
I’m not anti AI, I’m against companies making profit out of other peoples work without paying them.
everything is a remix
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/X9RYuvPCQUA
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.