• 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      93
      ·
      9 months ago

      Endeavor os is an utterly pointless distro anyway, it doesn’t even host it’s own repos. Just use Arch.

      • NoisyFlake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        123
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        it doesn’t even host it’s own repos

        Yes, and that’s a good thing, otherwise it would be like Manjaro.

        EndeavourOS is perfect if you already know your way around a Linux system but don’t want to spend the time and effort to setup Arch.

        • aleph@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Technically, Endeavour does have its own repos but they only contain a relatively small number of non-essential packages. But yeah, other than that it’s basically pre-configured Arch with great defaults.

          • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            9 months ago

            No, the defaults are worse than the arch defaults, the wallpapers are ugly, dracut has worse documentation for desktop use, yay is bad, and the firewall GUI is pointless bloat (the thing on the KDE settings app is just better). Just use Arch.

            • burgersc12@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              9 months ago

              I found archinstall to be very simple to follow, even though the whole thing is shown through the CLI, its basically just one page where you setup everything like partitions, boot, etc. Was a lot easier than I expected with the way everyone talks about it

              • Owljfien@iusearchlinux.fyi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                My only difficulty with it was that I have too many disks and partitions and I didn’t want to yeet the wrong one by mistake

              • Petter1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Yea, it is a very simple CLI based TUI. And I prefer this over GUI in this case, to be honest.

            • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Archinstall is TUI, it’s barely any more complicated than Calamares and gives pretty sane defaults and even the option to install DEs.

        • 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Im not saying that it should, but not doing it literally reduces the distro to little more than an install script for Arch. Just use Arch with the archinstall script or the 10 minute manual install.

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          For the record, there’s nothing wrong with Manjaro either, it doesn’t deserve the Internet hate it often gets and I’m happy to use it as my daily driver.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        9 months ago

        EndeavourOS has its own repos and uses them to good effect to add small but important quality of life improvements to Arch.

        EOS also had the very good sense to not reinvent the wheel and reimplement the best thing about Arch ( the large, high-quality package library ).

        LMDE ( Mint on Debian ) is another distro that gets this right.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    What is the best option if you wanted to run Linux on ARM?

    These days I’m more interested in the ARM world rather than the x86 world because ARM is simpler, power-efficient, scalable from cortex M0 to X4 and everything in between, and I took a class on ARM assembly language. x86, on the other hand, is full of legacy cruft and complicated as a result, and x86 is power hungry. Look at the new Intel 14900K, it draws over 400W!

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The problem with Rpi is the file provided by Fedora is an ISO, and Rpi doesn’t have a way to boot from a live USB; it needs a complete tar.gz to flash onto the SD card.

            ETA: there’s actually a way to make Rpi boot from a USB drive, but that’s typically used to boot the entire system, not a temporary live USB. Maybe it would work, but I’ve never tried it.

            • Para_lyzed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              It’s been a few years since my last manual install of Fedora (I’ve just been upgrading it), but I got Fedora Server to install just fine. I did it one of two ways (again, I can’t remember which): I either used the USB boot option to install to an SSD I attach via USB, or I booted the liveUSB on my laptop and installed to the USB SSD. In any case, Fedora has worked flawlessly for me for a few years on Pi now, so I would strongly recommend it.

              Just as an aside, I highly recommend against using a microSD card if you have a Pi model that can boot from USB storage. They are far less stable than an SSD, and are not designed to withstand running an operating system from. They are also dramatically slower, and much more painful to work with. Getting a cheap USB enclosure for an SSD is a far better solution, just try to pick up an SSD with a DRAM cache. It will increase throughput and increase the lifetime of the SSD, and I would not recommend running an OS from an SSD without a DRAM cache.

              EDIT: I believe this to be the easiest way to install Fedora for a Pi device. You will use a desktop/laptop Linux device, and the arm-image-installer will take an ARM ISO and install it to your storage media (SD card, microSD card, SSD, etc.). It was also the first thing I found when I looked up how to install Fedora on a Pi.

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, I’m also interested in ARM because it means we can have a very light laptop / tablet running a full desktop OS without the typical limitations of iOS / Android.

      Debian is for sure the most stable thing in ARM, mostly because it is the upstream of many ARM-focused distributions like Armbian and there’s also where ARM CPU makers usually test their stuff. There’s a constant stream of patches coming from those manufacturers and downstream distributions because everyone wants to mainline both kernel and userland support for their ARMs.

      Unfortunately there isn’t much decent “open” tablet hardware to run Linux on. The interesting things like those ultra-thin Lenovo tablets with amazing screens have locked bootloaders and other bullshit that stops people from loading Linux into then and making drivers / the required adjustments. Then there’s the Pine stuff that (even if you can get it) it’s overpriced, bulky and not a finished hardware product in any way.

    • RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Debian? They have good ARM support (the raspberry pi OS is based on Debian, uses its repos). Definitely also install flatpak. Most, but not all, flatpaks have arm builds.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      What is the best option if you wanted to run Linux on ARM?

      Good question.

      These days I’m more interested in the ARM world rather than the x86 world because ARM is simpler, power-efficient, scalable from cortex M0 to X4 and everything in between, and I took a class on ARM assembly language. x86, on the other hand, is full of legacy cruft and complicated as a result, and x86 is power hungry. Look at the new Intel 14900K, it draws over 400W!

      Last year Hetzner introduced arm64-based cloud servers with Ampere processors. Looks promising. I hope more providers will follow.

    • kadotux@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Don’t know about best, but I’ve been running Arch on Raspberry Pi 4 for a few months now. So far I’m having no issues. Changing from the default kernel to rpi kernel went also smoothly.

    • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
      cake
      M
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Unpopular opinion, but Gentoo is perfect for ARM. Availability of pre built binaries for ARM can sometimes be an issue. Gentoo gives you the option to compile from source, so that if a package is available for x86, it will still most likely work with ARM