• MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The problem was never the PSN requirement, it was dropping it on people months after launch. No one would be pissed if it had been enforced from day one.

    They don’t want out, they want sony to wise the fuck up and get with the program.

    All I’m saying is, this isn’t some planned-in-advance good cop bad cop routine.

    Agreeing to terms isn’t the same as watching your business partner mismanage the customer base to the point your lunch goes up in flames.

    Sony is the publisher. Launching the game in countries that don’t even have PSN is 100% on them. Sony is taking action that makes no fucking sense in context, no matter what Arrowhead agreed to.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think the reason I’m most glad I’m not a lawyer is bc then I would believe that that tiny text is a meaningful gotcha that some how justifies Sony being stupid. No, it wasn’t required bc you could play without signing in. Tiny words don’t define reality.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        I know. But that doesn’t matter much in the face of how it actually got handled and the community reaction it led to.

      • homesnatch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There were mixed messages from the beginning… The FAQ stated that PSN login was optional.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lay with dogs, get flees. I don’t pity Arrowhead for signing an anti-consumer contract with an anti-consumer company for money and then realized it hurt their image with consumers. This is the consequences of actions. Maybe their next game will be self published. That was always an option. They didn’t pick that. They picked this.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s all well and good, but then you take issue with the companies involved for completely different, industry spanning, reasons.

        That’s not a retort to what I was saying.

        • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yes, you’re right. Arrowhead aren’t playing good cop. They deeply regret their decision. As they should. They ruined an amazing game by giving control of it over to Sony. I still agree with the OP. Fuck Arrowhead for ruining an awesome game by giving Sony control.

          • MentalEdge
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Your approach to discussion is similar to that of a wrecking ball.

            Next time, just add a single sentence along the lines of “still glad seeing everyone involved anti-consumer bullshit crash and burn”.

            That’s still a valid take. But you’re not gonna see the improvement in the industry we all want realized without caring about the nuances, or acknowledging how and when most people actually care.

          • reksas
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            i wish people knew better than buy stuff from certain companies. But they dont and they dont care, so everyone who does care shall suffer.