• redfellow
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That dude is a class a troll and/or batshit. Not sure which, but I’ll be taking the same action.

      • redfellow
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Dude is not gender specific, you moron. Unisex terms are suitable for any type of sex. Including your insane bug-sex.

        • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, you’re wrong and I don’t like you, but somehow I’m still happy that at least someone is acknowledging my gender. Even if they hate it, I’m just glad it’s not being dismissed as not my actual sex. I’m happier being told my gender is insane than that I have no gender. So thank you.

          • redfellow
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not wrong though. “Dude” is now also used as a unisex term. It’s not the 60s anymore.

            Unisex is an adjective indicating something is not sex-specific.

            • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              So in your opinion, you can hurt someone’s feelings and not apologise if that person doesn’t share your opinions on linguistics?

              • redfellow
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Any hurting of feelings spanning from not knowing what a word means is your own responsibility.

                I nor anyone else can be responsible for problems in your understanding of modern English. Not in the slightest.

                Simply, you have a misconception about the word, not an opinion.

                You are, of course, welcome to come with any arbitrary definitions for common words, but doing so will just make communication with others more difficult. Still doesn’t make them “linguistic opinions”. It’s language, which evolves constantly, whether you acknowledge the fact or not.

                  • redfellow
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    The exact opposite. I reckon the issue is that you don’t understand what you read.

                    There’s nothing to apologise, when the hurt stems from not understanding what you read.