Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agoHilarious rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up1542arrow-down13
arrow-up1539arrow-down1imageHilarious rulelemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square21linkfedilink
minus-squareRaivoKullilinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoI understood their point just fine fwiw
minus-squareWarl0k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoThat’s the problem - it was ambiguously phrased. Multiple (correct-as-read) interpretations could be drawn from it, but that appears to have unleashed their ire.
I understood their point just fine fwiw
That’s the problem - it was ambiguously phrased. Multiple (correct-as-read) interpretations could be drawn from it, but that appears to have unleashed their ire.