Hola!

  • 1 Post
  • 18 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 4th, 2021

help-circle



  • As a scientist, for me this gap was bridged by doing a Masters/PhD.

    In my field, learning involves performing experiments using very expensive equipment and potentially very expensive failures. One also needs to spend a lot of time doing things that will build their own value (like reading papers and manuals and performing failed experiments) without necessarily producing a valuable output in the short term. It is difficult to do these things on your own without help and financial support from academia or industry. One would need to be in a very privileged position to be able to bridge the gap on their own.





  • That sounds abusive.

    In the report linked above there is a section on Plant-Closing Threats. They point out the following:

    Employers recognize the value that plant-closing threats add to an overall anti-union strategy, and they frequently issue such threats even when they do not intend to carry them out. Bronfenbrenner (1997) found that half of all employers involved in union organizing campaigns nationally issued threats to close all or part of their operations should the union be victorious. Just three percent actually followed through on these threats after workers voted in favor of union representation. (Bronfenbrenner 2000)

    There is also a section that discusses the legality of such anti-union strategy:

    Most Employer Tactics Are Considered Legal or Difficult to Prove as “Unfair”

    At first glance, many of the tactics that employers use appear to violate the law. For example, the threat of company closings or relocations is one of the most common anti-union tactics used during organizing campaigns. The following are examples from the CRC Survey of the ways in which employers delivered the threat that avoid explicitly connecting the closure of the facility to employees’ decision to join or vote for the union or engage in protected activity:

    • “I can close this company if I want to.”

    • "I might have to close [the company] because we don’t have money. I might shut down [the company] and re-open it under a different name.”

    • "The company is losing money and can’t compete with a union in place.”

    • "The company next door closed because of a union. A lot of companies are closing down or leaving the U.S. because of the unions.”

    • “Unions make our business unviable”


  • With a culture like this it makes sense that they would want to protect their rights to own a gun. If receiving their first gun is a special milestone during their youth, and the person grows up shooting guns with family and friends, I can see how guns can become part someone’s identity.

    Most of my life I have lived in countries were guns are banned, so from my perspective it is easy to say “No, of course that I don’t want it to be easier for the people around me to own guns!”. But I can appreciate that it is different when you talk about removing a freedom that is accessible at the moment.




  • I prefer bow and arrow in the shooting range and a camera for wild animals.

    As for control. I am sure that there are people who have very good reasons for owning a gun, and I do not like blanket bans. I am in favor of a process that allows a citizen to obtain a gun legally. However, it is my understanding that it is easier to obtain a gun than a diving certificate in the US, and that to me seems like an incredibly low bar.


  • When you do delete your account you have 30 days to restore it. I think that their reasoning behind this is that it gives you time to regret your decision and come back.

    But you can use the psychology of this feature in a different way: Delete your account while giving yourself explicit permission to restore it if you need it within the next 30 days. I did this and, well, it’s truly deleted now :-)

    You can also export all of your photos to another cloud storage service automatically.