• style99@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hmm… Maybe we should be helping prevent ruzzia from doing that somehow. Maybe we should offer some financial assistance to a country that is actively seeking to limit ruzzia’s ability to threaten others. That’s starting to sound like a really good idea.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        By stressing their military industrial complex capabilities enough so they have to decide whether to build another tank or invest in a satellite.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ukraine is hitting oil depots as military targets, satellite facilities would be fair game targets as well. No way they aren’t using satellites to get Intel over Ukraine.

  • Zaktor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    according to multiple sources familiar with the intelligence.

    Sounds like multiple sources are violating the laws about classified information. Is the urge to gossip with your reporter “friend” really that overpowering?

      • Zaktor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why? This isn’t revealing anything individual people need to react to and isn’t showing mismanagement or corruption within government that needs to be fixed. What are you going to do in your life knowing this?

    • stown@sedd.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The nukes in space aren’t intended for space targets, they are intended for earth targets.

        • stown@sedd.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          This whole article is speculation. I’m speculating that what they are speculating about is bit incorrect, specifically the point you are making.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          There are but it’s difficult to match the power of a nuke’s EMP if set off 200km above the surface. It deforms the Earth’s magnetic field, resulting in a very quick induced current from the initial deformation, and a slower one that wrecks power stations at the ends of long power lines as it slowly returns to equilibrium. There’s another surge mixed in there, too, though I don’t recall the specific mechanism that causes it, though it’s similar to a lightning strike’s effect on electronics and could be prevented with a surge protector, if the first one hadn’t already destroyed it.

          That’s what I think this is really about. Not disabling satellites (though some would be), but EMPing the entire hemisphere when the grid is absolutely not capable of handling that. Imagine one of those going off Jan 6 2025. Even if government buildings are hardened against EMP (could go either way I suppose), video of what goes on would only get out if a coup fails, and even then only after the fact once the grid has been re-established and who knows what happens in every single city when the trucks can’t bring food in because their electronics are all fried.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I dunno, what you are talking about doesn’t sound new. Just put a nuke on a regular satellite. They already fly in that space. Would it even give off enough radiation to be detected?