If you want a easy, reliable and cross-platform way to share files between computers, phones, etc, it may be of your interest.

    • Mrrdrr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Burning physical bluray discs can take quite a lot of time.

          • XTornado@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Idk about now… But BluRay Disk drives were quite expensive and not worth it, only worth it if you could burn Blu rays but those were even more expensives. So not common at all. Even physical games that could have benefit from then used just multiple DVDs instead, like the Flight Simulator 2020 which uses likes 10 DVDs

            • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              You said disk drives, not specifically bluray disk drives. The former is not entirely uncommon yet, though the latter may be. Although in retrospect it may have been obvious by context that that’s what you were talking about. Sorry about that.

              • XTornado@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Well actually you got confused as I am not the guy who did say “disk drives”, that’s somebody else.

                In any case I understood you as talking about the non BluRay indicating they are common in builds.

                I mentioned BluRays because that’s the only one that nowadays could make sense to have and could be common to add to a build, but not even that is being used commonly due to being expensive and basically only used by movies and those are usually played elsewhere.

                I honestly don’t think most people would bother building a new PC with a normal disk drive, they are completely useless. New games/software/video/music are digital or use BluRays, except music I guess. And any other uses has been replaced with external USB drives or other mediums as those are better in many ways. So unless you have some specific need it’s worthless and if you have a need a external USB disk drive is more practical.

                • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Well actually you got confused as I am not the guy who did say “disk drives”, that’s somebody else.

                  Whoops! Sorry. ^^"

                  I mentioned BluRays because that’s the only one that nowadays could make sense to have and could be common to add to a build, but not even that is being used commonly due to being expensive and basically only used by movies and those are usually played elsewhere.

                  I honestly don’t think most people would bother building a new PC with a normal disk drive, they are completely useless. New games/software/video/music are digital or use BluRays, except music I guess. And any other uses has been replaced with external USB drives or other mediums as those are better in many ways. So unless you have some specific need it’s worthless and if you have a need a external USB disk drive is more practical.

                  I wouldn’t say they’re completely useless, but I can agree with enough of what you’re saying to at least respond with a simple “that’s fair.” :)

    • Bloody Harry@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Answering the question you meant to ask, blueray is a physica… just kidding.

      LocalSend is basically like bluetooth file sharing over WiFi. Bluetooth, especially the fallback 2.0 is notoriously slow and short ranged. The situation got better with BLE, 5.0 and Long Range. Still, both devices need to speak BT. Ap*le’s iOS is well known to ignore BT file sharing capabilities while implementing own proprietary solutions. On desktop, the situation is still bad. I once tried to send a file between two Windows machines via BT, and it was a horrible user experience. LocalSend (and similar) fix this by implementing cross platform apps and using readily available API’s to share files with few clicks and reasonably high speed between a plethora of devices. I guess, if you don’t have the aforementioned problems, you won’t need LocalSend et al.

      • EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        especially the fallback 2.0 is notoriously slow and short ranged.

        So that’s why my Bluetooth file transferring back in like 2015 was slow as balls! I also assumed it was the devices I had. Lol. Which is weird considering I could have sworn I had also done BT file transfers with other devices previously and it seemed a lot faster. (None of these were Apple devices).

        Ap*le’s iOS is well known to ignore BT file sharing capabilities while implementing own proprietary solutions.

        Rude.

        [Everything else you said]

        That makes a lot of sense! Thanks for explaining. :D

    • Edu4rdSHL@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It does work over network, so you don’t need any physical connection apart from being in the same network. Therefore, it’s easier, faster, less complicated, and more.