What happend to /u/Gwynne? She seemed quite active.

    • poVoq@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Hmm maybe some PM harassment? Dunno, but I actually see a PM system as a net negative, even though personally I never received (or did) any harassment through it.

      • soronixa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        I think pm is a good feature for when two people want to have a chat, but right now it misses the report system, so yeah.

      • lorabe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        I think PM should be considered as a neutral feature that doesn’t harm communities on itself.

        Sometimes the behabiour of the communities is the problem rather than the tools.

        • poVoq@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          I disagree. Sure it has some benefits and is not all bad, but there seems to be very few use cases where you really need a PM feature compared to the possible abuse that can be done through it. I think an optional profile field to add a chat handle on Matrix or XMPP is sufficient for people to have a way to contact them directly.

          Maybe PMs should be moderator only? Or at least the getting PMs from non-moderators could be opt-in?

          • lorabe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 years ago

            i respect your disagreement, having that said, my middle ground would be to have the feature as an optional one by default, so people who wants to have that kind of interaction would be able to.