For the past few years, a growing number of users, analysts, and experts raised alarms about a truth that feels obvious to a lot of people who surf around in web browsers: the quality of Google results is in serious decline. Google disagrees.

  • Stuttgart273@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    10 months ago

    The dangers of a monopoly. No matter how bad Google gets people will still use it because, in many people’s minds, there is no other search engine.

    • quatschkopf34@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What are those? DDG, Bing, Ecosia etc. are all not really better than Google. I haven‘t tried Kagi yet, mostly because it costs money.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m using Qwant and it gives me better results than Google. Even Startpage does and it’s using Google behind the scenes.

        Google managed to fuck up their personalization so much it makes the results worse (it’s almost like they only really care about tailoring the ads /s). And I’m suspecting it’s by design, if the results suck the users are more likely to either press the ads or go through more result pages, therefore seeing more ads.

      • Nyfure@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        I am actually kinda ok with DDG, but the results are… not always very great and the second page is filled with weird websites related to my location…
        Maybe i should try both Kagi and Searx

      • kusivittula
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        i was struggling with DDG too, but in another post i saw someone recommend searx and it is actually really good.

        • Mixel@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Fyi searx is deprecated or at least not maintained and discontinued Switch to searxNG which is an active fork and it is really good :D

          • kusivittula
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            searxng.site is what i use. i didn’t even know it had different forks too

      • kosmoz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can actually try kagi for free. 100 searches/month should be enough for you to decide if it’s worth the money to you.

        (Not affiliated; just a happy user)

      • Sina@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        DDG is on pair with google, that’s enough for me. (in some topics far better and in some far worse)

      • Mixel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I agree it does suck in general One thing I tried is using a metasearch engine and for the least part I find the results better and way more customizable (for reference I am self hosting searxNG)

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          same, just being able to blacklist content farms I dislike is worth the price (standing up a container) of admission, but there’s plenty more good things.

      • w00@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can use Kagi for free if you make an account and only use it when the others fail. Love Kagi, but won’t pay for it.

    • Mnglw@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      eh, ddg is equally bad with it insisting it knows better than me what my query is and “fixing” it, leaving me to have to either fix it or click a link telling it “yes I really did want to search for that and not what you assumed”