tardigrada@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agoSubstack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi contentwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1195arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1195arrow-down1external-linkSubstack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi contentwww.theverge.comtardigrada@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square95fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareFlumPHP@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up40·1 year agoIt’s also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they’re already censoring.
minus-squarePotentiallyAnApricot@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 year agoRIGHT. Thank you for pointing this out. :::
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoRight, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned. So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here
It’s also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they’re already censoring.
RIGHT. Thank you for pointing this out.
:::
Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned.
So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here