We will need small and independent commercial providers for the Fediverse.

  • MyOpinion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Community is enough. The Fediverse allows for small servers that do not cost a lot to run.

    • rglullis@communick.newsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Due to the lack of economies of scale, they cost more per user than centralized alternative. Either we will have thousands of people who don’t mind footing the bill of the free riders, or we all will have to pay our share.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s true. Unless we start hosting something heavier than text extensively I expect the bill per user is still going to be tiny, though.

      • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think it’s definitely the first one. Very unlikely things have any reason to shift to an all paid model. Even still the cost of a single user is almost negligible. The cost to support thousands of those “free riders” is still probably on the order of dollars.

        • rglullis@communick.newsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Probably at first, yes. But I’d guess that after the novelty wears off, the percentage of people willing to pay $5-$10 per month for a service that can be had for $10/year (just to compare with my basic Mastodon service on Communick is going to go down. They will either start looking for an alternative where their money is covering someone they know (something that I also tried to cover with “group packages”) or they will upgrade to run their own instance so they have more control over their fediverse presence.