• Cowbee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What history? What economics? Vague gesturing and feigning superiority without actually saying anything is peak.

    Edit: turns out the economics was just Sowell all along, lol. Guess we have an AnCap over here.

    • fosforus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You’re implying that the meme “capitalism bad” has amazing amounts of nuance.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You weren’t replying to the meme, you were replying to someone else in the origin of this fork of the comment chain. I’m implying that you in particular have no nuance.

        • fosforus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, you’re not wrong, but what I replied to (“don’t know what capitalism is” and “are rent seekers”) wasn’t exactly filled with nuance, either.

          • Cowbee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Fair enough, but again, you somehow had even less nuance and pulled the classic bit of feigning superiority.

            Edit: oof, you unironically suggest Sowell in another comment as a good resource. Looks like I’m correct, the superiority was indeed completely unfounded.

            • HardNut@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Instead of berating him for not leaving a robust enough comment for your taste, why don’t you ask for more information? Calling capitalists uninformed or rent seekers is way more unfair than alluding to historical or economic evidence to the contrary. The latter clearly leaves itself more open to good faith discourse, getting nothing out of it has simply been a failure on your part

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The very first thing they said was “what history? What economics?” - so yeah, they’ve asked for information.