I feel like someone tooling with a secure messaging app makes it less…reliable that its secure, despite yanking google play parts out of the code. Thoughts?

  • MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Client is open source, but the server is not. So I would say Telegram as a service is not FOSS.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I don’t know why people spend time building open source clients for not-self-hostable services. You could potentially spend hundreds of hours on something that can be shut down on a whim. Discord and spotify bots and clients, twitter or facebook clients, their APIs have been either severely restricted or shut down in the past.

      • XTL
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Because of users. Having some_other_superior_service is useless if the user you care about doesn’t use it. If someone or something you care about uses telegram, you’ll need a telegram client to talk to them. Or signal, WA, whatever. Some people are willing to be users for that. Some are willing to be devs.

      • ksynwa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Nitter is pretty good tho. Makes Twitter usable without logging in. But yeah a FOSS client for Telegram feels like a waste of keystrokes.