I feel like someone tooling with a secure messaging app makes it less…reliable that its secure, despite yanking google play parts out of the code. Thoughts?

  • PandaCoderPL@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Telegram FOSS is definitely better than official client if you really have to use this service but you should look for some alternatives like Session.

  • the_tech_beast@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    Telegram FOSS removes a lot of the proprietary code from the official telegram client and also it prefers OSM instead of Gmaps. I’ve been using Telegram FOSS for some months and I haven’t faced any issues. As for security, I am not really sure.

    If you are using telegram for any sensitive conversations, I wouldn’t recommend using it. Use Signal, Matrix or some other good and open source messaging app.

  • sibachian@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don’t know why Telegram is always the go-to topic for ‘secure messaging’, especially as a contender vs discord. When we have the option of matrix.org, which is not only encrypted, but federated.

    • HMH@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Because Telegram offers top notch user experience, apart from excellent apps they even offer native desktop clients. I really want matrix to succeed but as of now the user experience is clearly inferior.

      • sibachian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        how is it inferior? what’s wrong with the user experience of Element? it’s available on all major platforms with a native client + all modern browsers. has a nice ui. and loads of functions surpassing Telegram out of the gate.

  • MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Client is open source, but the server is not. So I would say Telegram as a service is not FOSS.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I don’t know why people spend time building open source clients for not-self-hostable services. You could potentially spend hundreds of hours on something that can be shut down on a whim. Discord and spotify bots and clients, twitter or facebook clients, their APIs have been either severely restricted or shut down in the past.

      • ksynwa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Nitter is pretty good tho. Makes Twitter usable without logging in. But yeah a FOSS client for Telegram feels like a waste of keystrokes.

      • XTL
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Because of users. Having some_other_superior_service is useless if the user you care about doesn’t use it. If someone or something you care about uses telegram, you’ll need a telegram client to talk to them. Or signal, WA, whatever. Some people are willing to be users for that. Some are willing to be devs.