• MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ugh, you enjoyed a popular movie that also conveyed a message? Come back when you only watch Hanneke without subtitles, normie.

    Very smart douchebag

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      While at the same time not pointing out anything about the movie they are reviewing.

    • Gilles_D@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And that is fine. I personally thought it was okay. But it appeared to me that a lot of people had the sentiment that this was the first movie that ever “gets them”.

      It doesn’t have to be. There’s enough movies that depict isolation, loneliness, and outsiderism. But since this was coming from a supervillain franchise it seemed that a certain demographic suddenly stumbled into more serious topics processed through a movie with a familiar theme while they could have had that all along, just without the theme, but based in reality and executed better.

      Edit: clarification

      • Rolando@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, people liked a movie about isolation, loneliness, and outsiderism that met them halfway.

        I dig directors like Aki Kaurismäki and Lars von Trier as much as anyone, but a lot of people don’t find them “accessible”.

    • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that it’s a bad movie, but some people act like it’s some groundbreaking stuff. But it’s basically taxi driver, but not as good.

      • criitz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Personally (anecdotal) I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone raving over how this movie was groundbreaking.

        But every time it comes up there’s lots of people saying “ACTUALLY it’s NOT that ground breaking!” a la the stop-having-fun meme.

        I mean yeah it was the “same kind of movie” as Taxi Driver. And Empire Strikes Back was the same kind of movie as A New Hope. Big deal.

        As far as superhero movies goes, it was refreshingly off beat from the rest of the carbon copy avengers movies we’ve had shoved down our throats. And the climax of the movie was really powerful, in a way that wasn’t done before in Taxi Driver or otherwise. The last 10 minutes justified the entire movie on its own.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is hilarious and fitting. There were so many scenes in the movie where I was thinking of the better movie it was in.

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Image Transcription: Twitter Post


    Patrick Verona, @MasterTarantino

    thinking about this legendary joker review

    [A screenshot of a movie review for Joker (2019) is shown. The review states “if you’ve never swam in the ocean then of course a pool seems deep.”]