• nbailey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    Sadly, there’s an entire generation of libertarian anti-GPL “open source” developers that think the preservation of free software goes too far.

    • God@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      … What? I may be dumb. I don’t see how libertarianism is compatible with being anti FOSS.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        The idea is that for code to truly be free, you should be able to make it proprietary. If you can’t do that, then it isn’t really free. That’s how I understand the idea anyway

        • God@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          But that’s not being anti, just accepting the possibility of it. Like i consider myself a libertarian and if you wanna make it close source, ok, I may dislike it but I won’t regulate against it. But being anti would imply I would go out of my way to censor your ability to do close source.

          • lntl@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 年前

            It’s a GPL license thing. If you make a derivative work of GPL code, you’re NOT free to do what you want with it. This is where the 'anti come from.

            • sydneybrokeit@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 年前

              There are two parts to this. On one side, you have the “please follow the GPL if you’re using GPL code” – which is really just asking someone to honor a contract, more or less.

              Then you have people like RMS, who believe that there should not be such a thing as proprietary software. They don’t care if you aren’t using the GPL – no software should be proprietary, period.

              • lntl@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 年前

                I admire that RMS has a vision for the world and fights for it. World needs more people like this.

            • God@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 年前

              Ah. Well I’m pro theft so just use it and close it if you want and pray for the best! Hide the evidence to not get sued.

              • lntl@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 年前

                This happens from time to time. The offending party either removes the GPL code or they GPL the work. That’s life ;)