Seriously this was very surprising. I’ve been experimenting with GrayJay since it was announced and I largely think it’s a pretty sweet app. I know there are concerns over how it isn’t “true open source” but it’s a hell of a lot more open than ReVanced. Plus, I like the general design and philosophy of the app.

I updated the YouTube backend recently and to my surprise and delight they had added support for SponsorBlock. However, when I went to enable it, it warned me “turning this on harms creators” and made me click a box before I could continue.

Bruh, you’re literally an ad-blocking YouTube frontend. What kind of mental gymnastics does it take to be facilitating ad-blocking and then at the same time shame the end-user for using an extension which simply automates seeking ahead in videos. Are you seriously gonna tell me that even without Sponsorblock, if I skip ahead past the sponsored ad read in a video, that I’m “harming the creator”?

  • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe this is because sponsor segments are like traditional TV ads. They don’t use trackers, they are not targeted and they respect your privacy.

    • xep@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      124
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They don’t use trackers, they are not targeted and they respect your privacy.

      In that case it won’t matter to anyone that I skipped them.

      • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        As I’ve mentioned in another thread, I believe YouTube provides analytics on this (hence the “most replayed” parts for some videos), and I’m certain I’ve seen some creators mention sposors requiring that information before a deal is made. So it may really hurt some small youtubers that can’t rely on merchandise sales.

        That said, I personally use sponsorblock as I don’t feel like wasting my life on nordvpn ads, but I have to admit sponsor segments are a whole lot better than regular YouTube ads.

        Edit: And as I far as I know they pay much better than regular ads.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The most replayed section won’t count your view anyway since you’re watching through an unofficial app that doesn’t send tracking data to YouTube

        • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s true that YouTube does track the most watched portions of a video, but in the case of clients like NewPipe or this one the way the video is parsed it doesn’t send the analytic data necessary, so it likely doesn’t even count views, let alone watched segments.

        • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wish there was an add-on that could fake a view for the sponsored segment for the creator but skip it for the user. I.e. every time the user skips a sponsored segment, the extension adds a view for the sponsored segment for the creator, so they get paid whilst we skip their segment.

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They don’t use trackers,

        Well, they can see whether you watched them or not. So technically still tracked. At least in the official youtube app.

        • Ender of Games@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They can see the percentage of people who watched that part of the video, as part of the video analytics. This doesn’t track the user, though, at least not if you have history turned off, or are using another front end.

          • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And I’d guess that’s done in the backend instead of the frontend. They should be able to know how many times their server steamed a part of a video.

            • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Well when a video is buffered it’s loaded in memory but not viewed yet, they can’t count loading the video as a view or they’d count the whole video as viewed if you simply buffered it in full, it would also screw up that watched timestamps feature to see which part has been played back most.

              So yes they can count how many times it has been streamed but they also need to know you’ve watched it because sitting on pause while the video buffers all the way through isn’t a view, it isn’t watching those segments, but it does stream them from the servers, in the same way Newpipe and Grayjay does. Which is how a video can register no views despite being watched on something like NewPipe.

    • Kir@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t respect my attention and time, thought

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, the person making the video you are watching respected your time to the point they put in 10-100x the amount of time it takes you to watch that video to make it.

        And the sponsor ad is how they afford said time commitment.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          they put in 10-100x the amount of time it takes you to watch that video to make it.

          And show it to millions of people… So per capita… I put in more time then they did.

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No not even close. You did not put in more time.

          • kernelle@0d.gs
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hence why it might be hurtful to small creators. I’d love to see the numbers on that though, as the overall percentage of people using an adblocker is very low, I assume for Sponsorblock it’s significantly less.

      • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I completely agree with you, and that’s the reason I block them as well. I was just trying to give an explaination for the app’s behaviour.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Skip it all you want but don’t act like it’s such a terrible inconvenience. Creating high quality content is a full time job and people gotta eat

        • Kir@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everytime the same argument. I don’t want to see ads never ever, period. They are useless and annoying at best, sometimes plain evil manipulation.

          I recognize the need of income for creators, and they can ask for money in the form of donation/subscription and other methods. I am paying and will pay for everything I want to support. If you decide that your way to sustain yourself is by shoving up fake opinions and useless noise in order to manipulate me into buying something, I don’t accept it. It’s as simple as that.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            If the creators you like choose to monetize with sponsors, you can choose not to watch them instead of complaining about it on a forum. Or go create the content you like yourself.

            I don’t like ads either and have stopped watching several channels because of how they use them.

            “Every time the same argument” is right - “my time is valuable but the creator’s time is not!”

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Go for it! I’m not holding that against anyone. I’m railing against the entitlement of saying it’s “not respectful of the viewer’s time” to have sponsored segments.

                Like I said elsewhere, I think that stance is ironic because it’s not respecting the creator’s time and effort. “I want you to spend hours and hours making videos for me but I don’t want you to make money from it”

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Shit, I didn’t realize there were 48 hours in a day.

            Sorry, you’re right. Creators should work their 9-5 and then spend another 8 hours a day making videos for us out of the goodness of their hearts. I now think it’s disgusting that these people try to monetize their hard work

            I think it’s ironic that the argument is both “sponsor segments don’t respect my time!” AND “I have no respect for the time of the creators”

            • Dirk Darkly@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nobody needs YouTube videos nor is anyone compelled to make them. I’m guessing you don’t remember when YouTube was completely free and people just made videos for fun?

              Now people quit jobs that support them to do something fun and try to make monry off that. Which is fine, but we’re not required to support their hobby. Stop acting like people have no other option in their life except to make reaction videos, video essays, meme compilations, etc.

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If nobody needs them then why are they complaining? Just don’t watch it. Your problem is solved!

                Videos on YouTube are so much better than the era you’re remembering. If nordvpn or whoever sponsoring videos is the way for creators to continue making great things on a regular schedule, I’m not gonna make a huff when they take a minute to acknowledge them. I skip most of them, too, but I’m not venting about what a terrible inconvenience it is.

                And sorry for not specifying that I wasn’t speaking about reaction videos and meme compilations when I said “high quality”, I thought it that would be pretty damn clear but I guess we watch different things on YouTube

                Stop acting like it’s morally wrong to get paid for your work. If there’s a market for it, why shouldn’t people do it full time? Should Hollywood work for free, too?

            • brothershamus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay let’s get this straight: No Ads. Ever. Period. Capisce?

              Create, don’t create, steal, don’t steal, jerk off, don’t jerk off - don’t care. NO. ADS. THE END.

              • Kir@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Seriously, this. Advetising based economy is hell. what’s next? a punch in the face every 5 minutes of watching? And don’t you dare cover your face, because the creators deserve compensation and punch-a-face insertion by big corporation is the only way they got!

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I skipped over therlm for years before using sponsorblock anyway.

      • bionicjoey@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If that was their reasoning, they should say that rather than vaccuously claiming that it “harms creators”

        • crunchpaste@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, it does harm creators, as they may get less money. The same goes for adblockers.

          Then again I don’t really understand why would you care about being “shamed”, especially by a company that charges money for a frontend using YouTube’s (extremely expensive) servers for free.

          • bionicjoey@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then again I don’t really understand why would you care about being “shamed”, especially by a company that charges money for a frontend using YouTube’s (extremely expensive) servers for free.

            To paraphrase Norm MacDonald: the worst part is the hypocrisy 😅

          • Ender of Games@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “extremely expensive” is a bit of an overstatement.

            Youtube proper, not the rest of Google, is tens of billions in the black, annually.

            They reached this level of control over the market by running without video ads for a long time, forcing competitors to close out or not even open into the market without similar money backing. Turning around now and forcing tracking and ads should open them up to antitrust suits.

            It’s all arbitrage. If you can afford YouTube Premium’s price, and don’t mind the tracking, go for it. But all this ad blocking and alternative front ends MIGHT come to half a billion annually. uBlock has around 15 million installs, each installed user- assuming all separate and unique and blocking YouTube- would have to deny YouTube $1000 annually for it to be affecting their revenue.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also under control of what the creator placed in the video. Youtube can insert commercials into your video, even if you chose not to monetize it.

    • Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are right! I used to hate on sponsors but now I understand that they are way better than targeted ads.

    • YeOldGrim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On one hand true, on the other, a lot of those sponsorships advertise dubious things at best. I love the channels that just shill their own merch, but being entirely fair, you need to be at a certain revenue threshold to afford making said merch.

      The problem with those, 3rd party sponsorships is that they’re usually just either mobile games, F2P(P2W) MMOs, overpriced basic products or software advertised in the FUD way. Sorry, I don’t care for Raid Shadow Legends, War Thunder, Manscaped or NordVPN. Especially the last one and the ones like it grind my gears because the sponsorships for that kind of product are borderline misinformation.

      All of them, in some way, can be considered somewhat predatory. I’d rather buy a silly hat or a plushie, thank you very much.