• SeethingSloth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Laughing at these people for getting their retinas burned like I see many people do (not just here) is in really bad taste imo. Even cryptobros don’t deserve that.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Come to think of it, Radioactive Man looks kinda like he could be a differently coloured “bored ape”

  • The Barto@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Who’d have thought that a group of conmen would skimp on safety to make some money… I’m shocked, shocked I tell you!

    • herr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s more likely to be down to incompetence. I can’t imagine the party UV lights are more expensive than the fuck-you-up UV lights.

      EDIT: Someone else mentioned these might’ve been used during COVID for sanitation, and are extremely cheap leftover wares now that the pandemic is “over”, which would actually make them a lot cheaper.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never attribute to malice what can be explained by plain incompetence is a saying. But I think a new modern corollary can be made. Never attribute to incompetence what can be easily explained by greed, which just circles back to malice and is stupidity at the same time.

  • flicker@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Misread this as Concerned Ape and became… Concerned. And also mad I didn’t know there was a convention.

    • tekchic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      No this is not our Lord of Stardew :) These are actual dumb people that think NFT’s are a good idea and went to a conference for them. Ick.

      • webghost0101
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair the idea behind nft’s is great when its about tracking a commodity, item or piece of information.

        Its making them “THE” commodity that is cringe levels of stupid.

        I still hope that one day press will have professional onlines cameras generating an nft with location, time and camera id for every piece of footage. No more fake news with misused imagery.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, it’s sad how nfts are just a joke now because of the worst possible execution of what an nft could do/be became a massive scam

        • jmp242
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get what you want, I mostly fail to see how NFTs help there either. If a digital camera is generating the SHA256 or whatever that even links to the video file (and this would only work for the RAW, not even compressed for transmission data), then it’s a computer generating the data. I don’t really see why you couldn’t just have a computer generate a “fake camera” - it’s not like you’re going to be able to audit all the cameras a news org uses, and it’d be easy for someone to say they “lost” a camera, or it was stolen or whatever. And for the user submitted stuff from smartphones or their video cameras … etc.

          The problem with NFTs is always the link to the actual thing IMO. There’s just no cryptographic way to link a physical item or anything that doesn’t itself fit on the chain, nor is there a way to verify the original claims input that’s outside the blockchain - i.e. it’ll verify when the NFT was uploaded to the chain, but not when the video was taken. There’s no obvious way for the blockchain to validate the GPS data provided (or not) by the camera that took the video etc.

          • webghost0101
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Appreciating your points, it’s true that while the camera wouldn’t be foolproof, the nft can still significantly augment the traceability of media. When official channels and news is encouraged to source footage from there then certified uploaders would add a layer of trust, and legal reuse could be monitored effectively with a clickable badge/mark It’s not without its vulnerabilities, but it’s a step towards a more accountable media landscape. And makes it easier for people to dismiss random propaganda imagery shared online.

            • jmp242
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Does it? People misunderstood SSL so badly thr browsers started hiding the lock icon and actual details of the certs.

              But your idea still comes down to who you trust. If you trust the NYT then you’re going to go to their site they already control to see their images. If you aren’t sourcing the images from random third parties then this does nothing. And if you’re already trusting random Facebook pages, they can also NFT their posts.

              You seem to think no one can certify upload accounts now? But of course they do already.

    • BellaDonna@mujico.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure why you were voted down, because I feel the exact same way. No one should have to suffer vision loss from a public event, horrifying.

      • cro_magnon_gilf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whoa, I think my comment (and yours) was removed. Or am I missing something? Wierd