This is why the “good guy with the gun” BS needs to die. The real world isn’t a movie: there are no designated heroes and villains. Everyone’s a good guy in their own mind until they point a gun at a 6 year old.
I’ve always wondered how people thought the “good guy with a gun” would work in a chaotic real world situation. Suppose you’re armed and there’s a mass shooting event. You pull out your gun and keep a look out for the shooter as you hear gunfire getting closer. Then you spot a guy holding a gun. You quickly take aim and fire…
… And hit another “good guy with a gun” who was trying to take out the mass shooter the same as you.
Oh, but then you get shot by a third “good guy with a gun” who thought YOU were the mass shooter.
Arming everyone and telling them to be “good guys with guns” just seems, at best, like it would lead to MORE injuries and deaths.
Or, as has actually happened before, a good guy with a gun kills the bad guy and then gets shot by the cops who arrive thinking the guy with the gun is the bad guy:
Yup, this is how it goes down in my head, and why I don’t carry a gun. I think there’s a decent chance that I could take down an active shooter (not sure if I have the guts to, but that’s beside the point) because I have the element of surprise on my side, but there’s an even bigger chance I get shot either in the crossfire or by the police. Most of the time it’ll be a single shooter, but I have no guarantee that’s the case, so I’d need to be ready for a second shooter.
I’ve run through a few options, and I just don’t see a clear way to distinguish myself from an active shooter.
Of course, the other option is just say “please no don’t do it I have a wife and 47 kids!”
You could also try running, yes, or hiding, but “carrying a gun” and “trying to get to an exit or shelter in place and only using said gun if he blocks the exit or finds your hiding spot” are not exactly mutually exclusive, you can do both, you don’t have to “run towards the sound of gunfire” like some marine. In fact that would be the much smarter way to do it, “camping” isn’t frowned upon in real life, this isn’t COD. As for identifying who the shooter is “it’s usually the guy shooting unarmed people,” but failing that, “better to be sure and confirm your target,” unfortunately this puts you at a disadvantage but he’s willing to shoot random people and you aren’t (I hope), so what’re ya gonna do.
I’m not worried about me identifying the shooter, I’m worried about the police identifying me as the shooter or hostage taker if I somehow shoot the perp but don’t kill them.
Best case scenario, I shoot someone and risk getting shot by the police, worst case scenario I get shot by the perp (and even worse, they use my gun to kill people), and average case scenario, I get out alive without using the gun. I just don’t see a lot of good things coming out of it. My area is incredibly safe, so the chances of needing it are extremely small, the chances of it helping are even smaller, and the chances of my kids finding it are much higher than I’m comfortable with.
If I was commuting through a bad neighborhood, I could see it being useful. I live and work in safe neighborhoods, so it’s not an issue.
Well that’s why CCW training tells you to put your gun away if you’re sure it’s now a safe area, and if it isn’t now a safe area (possible other shooters for instance) to GTFO and call the cops and your lawyer. Also why you should give a description of the active shooter if you call it in, so they know “oh this dude in a T shirt may be a defender, we recieved a call about a guy in tac gear.” Of course, most often the shooters specifically target gun free zones because you can’t have one there, so you technically likely shouldn’t have one anyway, so makes sense the cops wouldn’t expect a defender in those cases either.
Yeah it’s something that everyone needs to decide for themselves (my issue is when people like to decide things for others.) It definitely can be helpful in a specific scenario, like a hammer to a nail, but it is also a responsibility and if you aren’t able or willing to, you shouldn’t, that simple. Especially if as you say you are you’re priviledged enough to live in a good area, in contrast to pizza delivery drivers (well, “ex”) who live in bad neighborhoods who may need them.
Agreed, and I’ll always defend the right to carry, for those who choose to. I think we should have some extra restrictions, like maybe a CCW for concealable firearms (and subsequent training), plus proof of secure storage in some manner if you have kids.
The only place I’d carry is at work, and it’s against company policy to carry. So I don’t, it’s just not worth the risk and the likelihood that I’d need it is so remote.
It’s deflective rhetoric so they don’t have to address the truth:
We don’t know who is going to make a bad decision with their gun until after they do it.
Yeah, my coworkers said how great it would have been after the Colorado movie theater shooting (Batman movie) if everyone was armed. They just knew the original shooter would have been killed right away.
So,
- Dark theater
- Smoke filled (by shooter)
- Bullets suddenly flying
Who in their right mind thinks basically everyone wouldn’t have been mowed down in a hail of gun fire?
It’s either that, or the people with guns are afraid to use them when the time comes and they hesitate too long to do any good.
I’ve always wondered how people thought the “good guy with a gun” would work in a chaotic real world situation.
They picture it pretty much how it went down here:
Personally, I would just prefer to have a pistol in hand if I ended up in the last part of ‘run, hide, fight’.
“There are no good guys with guns.”
also
“Cops are useless.”
You see, this is why nobody takes sentiments like yours seriously. If you can’t defend yourself, and don’t have others to protect you, then you’ll always be at the mercy of whoever is the strongest.
Something tells me all the ‘guns and cops are bad’ people don’t know how to fight.
I’ve been looking at your other comments and have some things to say.
-
Clearly your your out of your mind defending cops on Lemmy.world, for real when is calling the cops ever not put you the caller in a new type of danger? Fools with guns is bad regardless of the context and I for one cannot trust someone I have never met, especially the armed paramilitary we call police here in America.
-
Nice 'something tells me comment, always makes someone’s comments feel real sincere.
-
Most people can’t defend themselves, that’s reality. I’m actually pro gun but anti-idiot, and most people are idiots and that deeply complicates your arguments.
Thanks for coming to my Ted talk, I’m not a professional nor frankly good at most things, if you have problems with my arguments please, comment it don’t save it to yourself.
Lol. Clearly you’re just upset someone isn’t a part of the ACAB bandwagon.
Gonna block you now.
I don’t even know what that is lol.
All cops are bastards, he’s arguing you’re anti police.
Im anti shitty cop and by your comments so are you, dudes the worst kind of low effort troll.
Thanks for the context!
I was hoping they would say more, at least try to argue but they blocked me. I have yet to find a pro copper on Lemmy that has the balls to defend them fully.
That’s because it’s really really difficult to argue for authoritarians when you aren’t an authority lol.
ACAB - All Cops Are Bad
OP is still a tool.
Thanks for the context.
That’s okay, the tool is a mass blocker by the looks of it, remember just ignore the people who oppose your views, that’s healthy right? Lol.
The B is for Bastards
Nice, you can’t form an argument so you take your ball and run away. You’re a child, go back to timeout and let the grownups talk.
Really? Do you think everyone on the internet is worth arguing with?
You’re a child
Lol, the irony. Gonna block you too, bud. Make sure you respond to everyone, though!
Way to prove you’re a child and I’m amazed you needed an edit to come up tm with that absolute gem of a comment.
GUNNA BLOCK YOU TOO
-
Yeah cause when I call the cops about my stolen possessions and raped daughter they do so much to bring justice.
What if you are currently being threatened?
I sure as fuck don’t wait around for the cops to show up and decide I’m the threat and kill me while the guy breaking into my house has been gone for 20 minutes.
I’ll defend myself how I see fit and the cops will only be called if it results in death.
Do you think you would have a better chance at defending yourself with a gun?
Personally, I think if someone broke into my house, it would be dark…I’d have probably just been woken from a dead sleep. There will be dogs barking…possibly kids also just woken from a dead sleep who are now scared and either calling for me or running towards me. There’s no way I can put myself between my family and the bad guys in that situation. If I just start shooting, I’m liable to be shooting in the general direction of a pet or child. Even in the very best scenario, where somehow my kids, my pets, my wife, and my MIL who lives with us all happen to be in my bedroom in the middle of the night I’m still very likely to just shout that we’re armed and the police are on the way. Whether they steal a TV or I shoot a TV still results in me needing a new TV…but I also know that statistically, even me having a gun in my home escalates an already tense situation where I’ll be groggy but hopped up on adrenaline and not be a reliable shot. Even if it played out how folks like to imagine… one shot, one kill, I’ve still taken a life in front of my family. That’ll result in years of therapy for all of us. I’d rather just get a new TV or whatever. We’re more likely to get struck by lightning as a family than have a Richard Ramirez type who broke into the house just to kill us, and it’s more likely still that I’ll get depressed and use the gun on myself than it is that I’ll successfully defend my family with it.
I say all that as someone with military firearms training, family members in the local PD, and as someone who’s been woken up in the middle of the night by an emergency (in that case, our house was on fire).
Yes
If you think the cops are actually going to protect you if shit goes down, you’re naive as fuck. They’re not even obligated to do so.
Yeah. That’s why you should have a gun to protect yourself.
Until you become the shooter yourself.
Does that happen to everyone?
Every mentally unstable person with a gun I supposed.
I don’t recall saying cops are useless. Are you sure you’re replying to the right person?
The police do illustrate over and over again that even trained professionals make bad decisions when issued guns. And of course the solution isn’t to escalate things by raising the threat of officers being shot, but instead in finding ways to have less people with guns, so police aren’t on alert all the time and aren’t as tempted to use their guns as their only solution.
As a thought experiment: If we gave every adult in the world access to fire the entire planet’s nuclear payload and destroy everyone, do you think we’d all be safer? Would the world even last 5 minutes?
The more people you give access to deadly weapons, the more likely you are going to run into someone who is stupid, impulsive, or downright crazy and is going to use that weapon to harm themselves or others.
I think you’re asking the wrong questions.
You should be asking if society is safer if people have guns than if they don’t. Of course, answering this isn’t so simple because which society matters.
Uh, this has already been answered. Every developed nation with strict gun control is safer.
Every developed nation with strict gun control is safer.
Lots of rural America is still very underdeveloped. The only protection these people have from threats is the protection they can provide themselves.
This is what I mean by ‘which society matters.’ There are many differences between nations than just their gun laws.
I think you’re confusing “rural America” with a movie called “Mad Max”.
Which would have been safer without guns.
In any case, it sounds like what you mean to say is “the lawless hellscapes of the USA need to be civilized by an accountable organisation of some kind”, not “guns fix everything, hyuck”.
No, I’m not.
I think you are inexperienced with life outside of major cities.
Society is never safer with guns, and the more society you have the fewer guns you need.
If you live in barbarism, sure, you might need a gun, but barbarism is antithetical to a healthy society.
🎶 This is America 🎶
Don’t catch you slipping now
“Praaaaaise the loooord and pass the ammunition!” https://youtu.be/TUOPvtVZwo8
(Those aren’t just the lyrics, that’s the name of the song.)
Before clicking, I thought you were quoting from “Sin Wagon,” and I thought you really missed the point of the song.
“I’ll trick or treat your sorry ass if you don’t leave my porch right now, motherfucker!”
“He also shared that just the night before the incident, two people had knocked on their door severally and ran away before he opened the door.”
This is what had him terrified
This guy needs to move to someplace remote if someone knocking on his door scares him enough to point a gun at a 6 year old.
Seriously… if you’re ready to shoot a couple kids ding-dong-ditching you then you don’t need your gun, you need a fucking psych ward.
This was just something kids did when i was growing up. The thought of someone ever coming out with a gun never even crossed our minds. Now it’s like you can’t go to Target without worrying.
About a half hour from where I live, a college student was killed because she and her friends got lost and turned around in a person’s driveway. They were backing out to head away when he came running at them, firing a gun. She got hit in the neck and her boyfriend (in the driver’s seat next to her) had to drive with her dying until they could a) get away and b) get good enough cellphone reception to cell 911.
I’ve turned around in people’s driveways many times. At most, I’d expect the homeowners to look through the window at me warily to make sure I’m leaving, not come running at me with guns blazing.
But, sadly, that seems to be the world we’re living in.
He needs to be moved to a prison.
Terrified? What does he think the 6 year old is going to do to him?
Move in?
Well, the kid did threathen him with a “Trick” if he din’t gave him a “Treat”.
He wasn’t trick-or-treating.
But surelly it was valid for the grown man with a gun to, given the day of the year it was, fear becoming yet another victim of the blackmail and intimidation of children like that 6 year old and thus having to preventivelly protect himself and his family?!
(/s, by the way)
Maybe he thought it was the “two people that knocked on the door before,” not the “6 year old.”
See what happens when you use your brain? Life starts to make sense, lol.
You certainly don’t open your door with a gun out before even knowing who’s on the other side if you’re using your brain. lol.
What if you’re in fear for your safety?
We don’t know what this guy was going through or who he may have angered.
What if you’re in fear for your safety?
Then I don’t open the door. If it’s a real threat I can pew pew after my door gets kicked in and be pretty sure I’m not shooting a six year old.
Although if a six year old manages to break down your door, shooting them is not really unreasonable.
And if they continue harassing you, then what?
Oh, well then the reasonable thing to do is point a gun at a small child, obviously
If you don’t have a peephole, invest in a chain lock. Or a Ring. You don’t have the right to point a gun at someone just because they’re outside your door.
I totally agree, but we don’t know what this guy was going through or who he may have angered.
You don’t point a gun at a six year old. Full stop. He didn’t open the door with his gun drawn and stop when he saw who it was, he waved it in his face to try to scare him. Inexcusable.
Then grab the gun and don’t open shit, if you thought you were in danger why open the door and let them have easier access to you? Make them break in.
Makes sense to me, but this guy might not be thinking clearly.
Well people get put in jail for “not thinking clearly” every day, so he should “get good.”
It could be cops, then you end up either shooting a cop (no big loss, but you’re not likely to live through it) or just getting shot.
Just like the police always shoot first because they fear for their safety.
What a fucking pussy
You probably don’t know what he’s dealing with or who he’s angered.
Yeah, give a paranoid man a gun.
Should he rely on the cops for protection?
From six year olds?
From threats.
Just cause this kid wasn’t a threat doesn’t mean threats don’t exist, lol.
So what did he point the gun at? A threat? Which was a six year old?
Remember the guy that shot the woman that was backing out of his driveway? Also remember the guy who shot a door to door salesman? Also remember the guy who shot a kid playing hide and seek?
Take his fucking guns away!
Can’t. 2nd amendment. You have to give him more guns. Also give a gun to the 6yo.
If we armed all 6yros this wouldn’t happen
Glocks for tots!
If every movie I’ve seen has told me the truth, then little kids should be able to take out bad guys much bigger, stronger, and better armed than they are. It should be super easy, barely an inconvenience!
Good kids with guns stop bad guys with guns.
deleted by creator
Were there a bunch of snickers and Reese’s in that bag or was he just insane
They better have been king sized.
Imagine doing time for “fun” sized
Idk quantity has a quality all its own, let’s hear more about total ounces
Well, then he’ll be enjoying some “fun” sized in jail.
Airheads and Sourpatch kids
So he chose the trick.
deleted by creator
He also shared that just the night before the incident, two people had knocked on their door severally and ran away before he opened the door.
“WTF is severally?”
Severally: separately or individually; each in turn.
Guess that’s my new word for the day.
deleted by creator
I thought so at first as well, but it’s an actual word.
Right? This is the first time I’ve heard this word used like this in my life, and I’m fairly well read and educated. Like I don’t doubt it is grammatically correct, but in my opinion, a writer’s job is to communicate effectively - especially in a news article. Because using the word like this caused general confusion among the readers, it is a failed communication.
It’s apparently more commonly used in legal documents - explains why we haven’t encountered it before.
Yeah you’ll often see it when co-signing a loan for example, where both parties are “both jointly and severally responsible” for the loan.
Opposite of jointly!
I would have thought that “separately” served that purpose just fine.
“Severally” connotes separated by intent. Separate and independent.
Wen reportedly told cops that he “just wanted to scare them.”
Because the best way to do that is by brandishing a lethal weapon.
Well, it probably is the best way to scare them
a resident of the infamous Long Island,
IANAA, what is long island infamous for?
Put simply, shenanigans.
It’s essential the northern Florida.
Not only is this completely wrong, it doesn’t even make sense with the context of the post the person you’re replying to is asking about. 0/10 troll bait.
what does not being an accountant have to do with it?
deleted by creator
That explains why somebody who says I Am Not An Alcoholic would not know what Long Island is famous for.
It’s more than famous. It’s not just famous, it’s infamous!
So many Martins and Stevens in that movie.
Amy Fisher? Iced Tea? The Montauk monster? The New York Islanders? Brooklyn?
Think there may have been some high profile serial killers there at some point.
thank you for actually trying to give an honest answer
Anytime :)
IIFFBINYABAI.
I Ingest Four Fries Because I Never Yeeted A Burger Across Idaho?
Could be Forty Fries
Jesus fuck.
Finally, some good news on News@lemmy.world!
Username checks out.
deleted by creator
Wow, reminds me of this:
The shooting happened when Hattori, on his way to a Halloween party, went to the wrong house by mistake. Property owner Rodney Peairs fatally shot Hattori, erroneously thinking that he was trespassing with criminal intent.
Guy’s gotta have hobby.
Game is game, kid.
deleted by creator
Sounds like a movie where his friend gave the candy that had intelligence sent by the CCP and now he really needed it back to make it to the drop off on time.
But I’m just daydream at night
