• deegeese
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t fool me, they gave it away when they removed “Don’t be evil” from their motto back in 2015.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The first time I saw the slogan all I could think is “a normal not-evil person doesn’t need to make such a disclaimer”.

    • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were already evil at that time so honestly it was refreshingly honest when they dropped it

          • Polar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Didn’t realize correcting false information is boot licking.

            Enjoy living in your own reality where you tell yourself whatever makes you feel better.

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You didn’t correct false information. “Don’t be evil” was removed from their motto and you didn’t give any evidence to disprove that.

            • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don’t_be_evil

              “Don’t be evil” is Google’s former motto, and a phrase used in Google’s corporate code of conduct.

              The original motto was retained in Google’s code of conduct, now a subsidiary of Alphabet. In April 2018, the motto was removed from the code of conduct’s preface and retained in its last sentence.[6]

              Please explain how verified facts is false information.

              EDIT: Also, why did you not contest the claim from others who proved you wrong, if they are all wrong?

              • Polar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They just moved it. It’s still in place. Thanks for proving me right.

                • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah they changed from “We can’t do evil” to “If we do evil, that’s on you to report”. That’s exactly the same.

        • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Stop spreading this false rumor” and then gets proven wrong by a simple link to Wikipedia found in 5 seconds on google. I’m curious if they own stock in Alphabet, as I wouldn’t give a shit about their internal code of ethics when they don’t seemingly obey them.

          Also “false rumor” is kind of a needless statement. A rumor is false until proven true. Like an “unsolved mystery” is always unsolved, if it was solved, it would not be a mystery.

      • Sneezycat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not their code of conduct, they are telling YOU not to be evil.

    • quantum_mechanic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      68
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol, how simplistic do you have to be to believe this means anything? First off, you need to believe in good and evil, which are completely arbitrary. And do you think they thought “hmm, we need to start doing evil things do extract more profit… Change the motto so everybody knows! But then we’ll pretend to not be evil when confronted about this change…”

      Maybe being evil would be to not change the motto and start doing evil acts anyway. Simpler answer is that somebody probably thought it was a stupid thing to have on there in the first place, and was likely thought up by a Cheeto stained LOTR neckbeard.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Good and evil are arbitrary” mfers when I chop off their balls and feed them to their kids because I wanted to:

      • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        They started deemphasizing the motto when they became a conglomerate in 2015, and removed it completely in 2018 after employees started getting fired for criticizing Google’s shady dealings with the Customs and Border Protection Agency.

        Essentially, the employees argued that Google including “don’t be evil” in their contracts made them ethically obligated to speak up against bad behavior, and they didn’t actually want that. So it appears Google did indeed have a definition of “evil,” and when forced to choose between changing their practice or their definition, they chose the latter.

      • skulblaka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s what is known as a canary statement. Taken from when miners used to take canaries into the mines so that the bird would die first if there was toxic gas.

        If the canary is dead, something is wrong. Google had it in their mission statement to not do bad things, then that was quietly removed. The canary is dead.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Spoken like a guy who wants to avoid getting in trouble for being a bad person

        Google seems a great fit for you

        • seth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          We should’ve seen it coming; I just realized I’ve never heard “ogle” used in a positive way, and it’s what the company name is literally commanding us to do. Hindsight is 20/20.

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So what you’re saying is that driving a rusty nail through your eyeball into your brain isn’t evil at all, and totally fine to do?