Two of my coworkers frequently mention shows like “Encounters” or “Ancient apocalypse” or whatever. I’m not the best at debating or forming arguments against these though I do feel strongly that bold claims require better evidence than a blurry photo and an eyewitness account. How do you all go about this?

Today I clumsily stumbled through conversation and said “I’ll need some evidence” and was hit with “there’s plenty of evidence in the episode ‘Lights over Fukushima’”. I didn’t have an answer because I haven’t watched it. I’m 99% sure that if I watch it it’s gonna be dramatized, designed to scare/freak you out a little and consist of eyewitness accounts and blurry photos set to eerie music. But I’m afraid I just sound like a haughty know-it-all if I do assert this before watching.

These are good people and I want to remain on good terms and not come across as a cynical asshole.

(Sorry if language is too formal or stilted. Not my native tongue)

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If they take a netflicks show as evidence, I seriously doubt you will be able to convince them otherwise.

    • SpaceAce@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Also it’s not my place to raise adults. But a part of me wishes to plant a seed of skepticism. I have a hard time nodding and going along with it. I feel compelled to question it rather than going along with this kind of small talk.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your answer is right there. Plant seeds of doubt. Ask questions about it. Wow! Did they get footage?! Really? There must be two sources for such a wild thing to have happened! What does Snopes say? Lmfao

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You don’t have to convince them but you also don’t have to listen either.

        You just have to decide that any issues with cutting them off when they start talking about it is worth the effort or if it may cause problems at work.

      • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve watched some of the shows because they do actually lead to some interesting archeological digs I hadn’t heard of before… However there’s one thing that always nags me when watching this stuff – why do they always think ancient humans were so stupid? It is believed that the human brain has not changed for around 100,000 years, which means that no matter how far back you go in our observable history, those people had the same capacity for rational thought as we do. Sure, we have a huge advantage through the knowledge of written history, but even a cave man had the same ability as we do to accomplish a task with the materials at hand.

        You’ll also note they always ask a modern engineer how they would accomplish tasks such as moving large stones, and the answer is always something like “I would use modern machinery” because of course we’ve come to rely on them and nobody today ever tries to think of any other way to perform the same task. How were the great pyramids built? They always claim it can’t be done today, while conveniently ignoring all of the theories of how they did probably move those blocks.

        So I guess my skepticism on those types of shows is that they intentionally leave out significant details to make everything sound more woo-woo (every big claim they make probably already has a wikipedia page providing legitimate answers or at least giving factual details). Sure there are some things that still aren’t understood but just because you see some glowing lights doesn’t immediately mean aliens are involved. Even though I do believe there is other life out there, I haven’t seen any evidence yet on these shows that I would consider “proof” of visitations, but rather just a whole lot of “this is how we interpret the data to fit our conspiracy theory.”

        • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          why do they always think ancient humans were so stupid?

          Because they (and by extension their audience) are not that bright.

          If they cannot think of how it was done and they must be smart because they live with all this modern technology (which they didn’t create and don’t really understand) then there is no way for people in the past to have done it.

          Therefore…aliens. Well, that is the modern thought. In the past it you just replace aliens with God or Gods or Demons etc.

          • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah replacing “god” with “aliens” pretty much sums up the mentality here.

            One that really gets me (and I can’t think offhand of where exactly it is at), is an artificial cave network that appears to date back to the last big ice age, around 10,000 years ago. “But they didn’t have anything other than stone tools, so it couldn’t have been created by humans!” You’re telling me that if the only thing you know about is stone, that you wouldn’t have some understanding that some types of stone are harder than others? We’re talking about people living in one place for millennia with nothing to do except go out hunting for food and sitting in the cave, and in all that time they couldn’t have slowly cut out more caves to make their homes larger? Seems like such a simple idea to me, and yet it seems to go right over the heads of all these people discussing those caves. “Mommy I’m bored!” “Grab a rock and start grinding, dear.”

    • assembly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you sure they are taking it seriously? I’ve watched a bunch of Ancient Aliens and it was fun entertainment so long as it is recognized as just entertainment. The main voice in the show makes me fall asleep so I’ve technically had most episodes play across my screen. Me and coworkers make comments regularly that “it’s aliens man” as the reason for things. None of us see it as more than humor and maybe that’s the case with your people.

      • SpaceAce@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure but they do talk about it a lot and I have been cornered with things like “did you know that all fighter pilots since the 1960s have had to take an oath of silence because they keep seeing aliens up there, anyway this whistleblower…”.

        I’m having a hard time navigating these but letting them have their fun while just asking what they believe and why is probably not a bad approach.

        Someone mentioned that going through with debunking them is a spoilsport move that’s a lot of work to do right and would probably just sour our relationship at work.

      • RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I genuinely love Ancient Aliens but it’s definitely a comedy for me. I really don’t understand how anyone can take it seriously. My husband had someone in one of his college classes who believed an Animal Planet mockumentary about mermaids was real, though, so I guess people have fallen for dumber things.

        • assembly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yarrr….im going to blame this on Memmy as I really believe I hit the correct button and Memmy moved my comment. It’s easier to blame the app than move the comment.

          • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            All good. I linked spaceace so you wouldn’t have to move the comment and they would still be notified.

  • Tamo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Highly recommend the podcast ‘It’s probably not aliens’ if you want to find out more about the real history of the claims made in these kind of shows, and how the claims of aliens are often rooted in racism and colonialism

  • Digital Mark@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ignore it or mock it. I start preaching about Great Cthulhu at people who have loonie beliefs, and let them try to debunk me.

    I’ve got good at reciting “Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtagn!” in a high-pitched preacher voice.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Patiently explain that “alien encounters” are just the playful trickery of the Fae, who have been pulling this sort of thing for much longer than anyone was imagining spaceships.

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re approaching it wrong. Don’t fight them. Fake interest and talk with them to investigate their stupid believes. Try to understand why they believe it, how did they get brainwashed, what defence mechanism they have in place to discredit real science. It can be fascinating experience for you and you will learn a lot about people in general.

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, you can also do it but I really think it’s good to investigate people like this a bit. Couple years ago I spend some times watching the craziest videos about alternative science from my country and I think I actually learned a lot. My take now is that a lot of people pushing those things are actually smart and have a lot of charisma but without proper education. They don’t understand science because they never learned about so society tells them they are stupid. This creates growing frustration in them and when they stumble on alternative science they suddenly have an explanation: it’s not that I’m stupid, the science is wrong. Alternative science is a lot simpler, more intuitive and they can shine there and become some sort of leader. I notices they all tell the same (obviously made up) story: some guy said my invention is stupid but then I showed him how it works and it blew his mind and he was amazed at how great it is. Showing society they are actually the smart ones and everyone else is wrong is one of their main fantasies.

          • ExLisper@linux.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually for me Behind the Curve was more about community and fame. For most people it’s about belonging to some group. There’s a documentary about Star Trek that shows the same thing. For the ‘leaders’ it’s definitely about fame and other benefits and Behind the Curve was spot on here.

    • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of my coworkers was big into conspiracy and I had one conversation with him trying to understand where he’s coming from with all of this. I quickly realized that changing his mind was impossible because he wasn’t even talking with me, he was talking at me. After that I just smiled and nodded at everything he said. He’s yet to realize this

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. It’s reality TV you get paid to consume. Win win win. They think they are smart. You get to giggle internally. And your boss thinks you are a great leader.

  • Quereller@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    “How to deal with Ancient aliens in the workplace?”

    Man, for a second I thought you are talking about older, immigrant co-workers.

    • MajesticSloth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m with this. Unless it is about work, let people believe what they want. Or else you end up discussing a lot of stuff like religion and politics in a place it doesn’t need to be.

  • RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Woah woah woah. Hold on a second. There are actually people who take Ancient Aliens seriously?! I thought we all watched it because it was hilariously stupid.

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah even showing incredulity will keep the other person engaged, just be as boring a conversation partner as possible during the subject, try at every opportunity to change the subject, and eventually they’ll either get the hint, or just start bugging someone whose more fun to talk about it with

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You already made up your mind that you won’t believe alien stuff, and you don’t want to offend your coworkers. Then just treat those alien stuff as their hobby. When your coworkers talk about their hobby, what would you usually do? Certainly not trying to shit on their hobby, unless you don’t like those coworkers.

  • Maxnmy's@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is not worth challenging, especially if you are outnumbered. You are not likely to change their beliefs with evidence. The beliefs are flexible and can be endlessly swapped out with new beliefs that demand new evidence. I don’t know what you should do but you definitely shouldn’t attempt to change their minds like that.

  • teawrecks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This isn’t the hill you want to die on. If they ask for your input, just say that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and shrug. Most people follow these things because they’re exciting in an otherwise unexciting life, not because they’re dedicating their lives to discovering alien life or invading area 51.

    If they try to debate you, just say ok and smile. You’re not going to logic someone out of a position they didn’t logic themselves into.

    If you’re feeling up to it, you could just tell them about the invisible dragon in your garage, or the teapot that’s currently orbiting the sun.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    You should pick your battles. Think pretty carefully about what you actually want to debate/pushback on because it’s exhaustive and requires you to research the topic. It’s probably a waste of your time doing the research to debunk these alien sightings since a new one pops up every few months.

    • SpaceAce@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. Maybe I should ask general questions but not push back on anything. Like “What about this episode convinced you?”. “Do you think that’s enough evidence or would you like to see something more?”. “Wow, so why isn’t this all over the news, do you think?”

      Or is this line of questioning too obvious?

      • cabbagee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those questions are just going to open a can of crazy. Some battles aren’t worth fighting and in the workplace you’re going to see a lot of them.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        To me those shows are fantasy and i let the person enjoy telling me about the episode. I’d ask questions like wow what do you reckon the aliens are doing here or have you had any extra terrestrial experiences. Generic smalltalk stuff that let’s the person feel like they are telling you something cool and interesting because to them it is.

  • DeadNinja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Stilted”?

    You sir, are one of those fucking amazing people who profusely apologize for not being a native English speaker and then blurt out 37 paragraphs of perfect English.

    You have nothing to be ashamed of - your English is better than a lot of them native speakers ! And always remember this :

    “You are speaking English because that is the only language you know; I am speaking English because that is the only language you know. We are not the same.”

    And as to your original question - if I ever ask them “what evidence did you see which proves X happens?”, I have almost always been hit with the reply, “Oh yeah? What proof do you have that says X does not happen???”. And then I tell them the anecdote of the Invisible Dragon by Carl Sagan. Look it up if this is new to you, and for a more formal treatment, check out Karl Popper’s theory of Falsifiability.

    I have personally converted at least one conspiracy theorist to being an Agnostic. So I know it works. Try them out, it’s fun.


    And I also am not a native English speaker to be honest :-)

    • SpaceAce@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haha thanks. I know I’m being silly, on a certain level, apologizing for my English but as an anxious person I’m being defensive up front. I still feel like I don’t sound like a native, an outsider, and I want people to know I’m not native if they pick up on my English being off.

      Thanks for the advice. Though reading all them comments I’m starting to lean towards letting them have their fun. I am not great at debating anyway and maybe questioning without confronting is best.

  • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    This might sound like a crazy answer from a crazy person but hear me out. If they are good people and you’re somewhat familiar with them, just call them kooks, say that shit’s all made up and dismiss it. just don’t be aggressive about it, people can still be on good terms without agreeing on everything. Just be like “nah man, no way that happened these shows are just people who want attention, if it was real there’d be better evidence and it’d be all over the news.”

    I honestly think this is the best way to go, you’re engaging them honestly, attacking the show, not them. And so long as you don’t get hung up on their response or ‘winning the argument’ I think you can all remain on good terms. How you go about this obviously depends on how friendly you are with them but if they’re good people they’ll still be your friend even if you’re too dumb to see the truth about aliens.

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bingo. People are MUCH more willing to put aside what they’d consider absolute deal breaking things when they’re forced to interact with you anyway. Arguing with someone about this sort of shit wouldn’t change their minds and is a waste of time even if it somehow did. Be who you are and move along in your work relationship and expect them to do the same for you. That’s how you maintain a healthy work environment. It’s a good way to foster mutual respect.